When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It didn’t get anywhere near the “Lexus” on the caliper at least on my setup. I did however have to slightly grind on the calipers for them not to rub, and I’ve never been a fan of wheel spacers. I was surprised the rear calipers gave me a harder time with the fitment vs the front. I’ve just always loved the look on the wheels. And I wanted something while I waited to get the same size TE37s for my IS
Just for RPF1s or the offset in general? There's another thread with PF01s +45 , lowered and doesn't have any issues.
rpf1s only. Their face is sunken in. 45 offset is ideal otherwise. 38 May run into clearance issues on fenders if lowered or running aggressive tires. On that last point I’m not sure. That’s why i gave up on RPF1s.
+1 on RPF-1's fitting in 18x9.5 +38 fitting with decent clearance to calipers.
Actually, +3... Buddy here runs a set of them in 18x10's +45 on street rubber, and an identical set with track rubber for SCCA events... No fitment issues with either, and he's lowered a tad on Penskes.
+1 on RPF-1's fitting in 18x9.5 +38 fitting with decent clearance to calipers.
Actually, +3... Buddy here runs a set of them in 18x10's +45 on street rubber, and an identical set with track rubber for SCCA events... No fitment issues with either, and he's lowered a tad on Penskes.
-Nick
so would the 9.5 et 38 clear with 275 square? I imagine it may fit at stock height. Lowered would probably cause problems.
so would the 9.5 et 38 clear with 275 square? I imagine it may fit at stock height. Lowered would probably cause problems.
Depending on wheel & tire, they'd probably be ok, especially at stock height. My buddy is running 19x9.5 +40 with 275s (square), and he's lowered. Also, I think some others are running 19.5x9.5 +38 square (JDMV8?) lowered.. Though, IIRC, he's using 265 tires.