When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
No. Won't work. They moved things around when the redesigned the front suspension. The ball joints are not in the right places to do this. I looked at it when we got the GS F.
I would make a lower durometer version of our USRS bushings, if I felt that the NVH was the slightest issue. I find it odd that someone driving an ISF or RCF would be bothered by having a much more stable car and more communicative steering. I guess Lexus engineers know who they are catering to when they engineer the life out of their otherwise great cars.
But seriously, to say that NVH is an issue with our bushings, you’d have to have a butt with the sensitivity of a seismograph!
As far as LCA bushings go, don’t forget, the USRS is the only bushing that eliminates AXIAL movement of the LCA, due to our thrust loaded design.
Rafi
So were there a lot of complaints of increased NVH with the RR R&T (Road & Track) 95a Race USRS? It looks like there's a 88a Street USRS now.
No doubt. Love my solid bushings, but they definitely transmit more high frequency noise to the chassis and sharp bumps have a completely different feel than before. And there's zero axial movement with these unless the aluminum is flexing.
07-17-19, 03:22 PM
