IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

How Much Power Will a RR-Racing ECU Tune Make

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-20, 07:41 AM
  #1  
Boomin
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Boomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: fl
Posts: 1,906
Received 424 Likes on 256 Posts
Default How Much Power Will a RR-Racing ECU Tune Make

The following 4 users liked this post by Boomin:
JT2MA71 (10-17-20), Positron (10-16-20), Rossi (10-16-20), Scott610 (01-30-21)
Old 10-16-20, 10:03 AM
  #2  
Rossi
Racer
iTrader: (5)
 
Rossi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ca
Posts: 1,347
Received 193 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Awesome, I was hoping to see such a step-by-step video. I was under impression, that after the tune itself, the ECU needs little time to re-learn the new mapping rather than go straight to dyno. Am I wrong?
The following users liked this post:
FN_Darknes (10-19-20)
Old 10-16-20, 01:55 PM
  #3  
ISF2URGSE
Driver School Candidate
 
ISF2URGSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: EUR
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default


If timing is calculated as written down in the picture, how is it possible to advance timing with a tuning file and gain power?

In my opinion it is not possible, because the strategy of the ecu works always close to the edge of knocking. My ISF has an kclv between 24.6-25.1 and my klv stays about -3.0 degree, so there is no knocking detected. I can reach 25.1 only, if I drive the car very hard, as suggested to do after a remap. So even with stock file it is possible to pull up the kclv and gain some power.

If timing is raised in a tuning software, the kclv should go down till the point, where knocking is detected. So I think I drive with lower kclv than with stock software, but the same maximum possible ignition angle.

And as the result there should be the same ignition angle with the stock file or tuning file in theory and so no gain in power, because the ecu does it's own calculation.

I also read a topic in this forum, where a customer have had a roughly 3 degree lower kclv with remap than with stock software. Perhaps this is what I am talking about?

Maybe someone can explain, if I am wrong, because I am very interested in remapping my car.
The following 2 users liked this post by ISF2URGSE:
Boomin (10-16-20), JT2MA71 (10-17-20)
Old 10-16-20, 05:40 PM
  #4  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,435
Received 4,076 Likes on 2,470 Posts
Default

Except advancing timing isn't necessarily the thing the engine needs. Ignition advance is present so peak cylinder pressure is achieved at 6 degrees ATDC. What that actual number is doesn't mean much, and the smaller that number is, the more efficient your combustion chamber. When I raised the compression on my street bike engine from measured 9.2:1 (factory claimed 9.5:1), to measured 11.25:1, I had to retard full advance 7 degrees. I learned it was 7 degrees because when I set it to 5 degrees looking for more power, I crushed the ring lands on my #2 piston and had to rebuild the engine. And this was with full control of fuel via carburetor jets.

So, assuming this will be a good thing doesn't take into account the specifics of your engine. Keep in mind the factory works to tolerance. Stacked tolerance can be your friend and it can be your enemy. Some guys get factory engines that knock incessantly. Other guys get engines that never knock, but also never win stock for stock races.

There's a lot more to this than meets the eye...
The following 3 users liked this post by lobuxracer:
Joe Z (10-16-20), MileHIFcar (01-30-21), Quadrphnia (10-17-20)
Old 10-17-20, 07:40 AM
  #5  
Quadrphnia
Advanced
 
Quadrphnia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: IL
Posts: 642
Received 135 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
So, assuming this will be a good thing doesn't take into account the specifics of your engine. Keep in mind the factory works to tolerance. Stacked tolerance can be your friend and it can be your enemy. Some guys get factory engines that knock incessantly. Other guys get engines that never knock, but also never win stock for stock races.
I enjoy watching all the mod stuff, but I'm a stock guy when it comes to this car. Outside of cosmetic & some electrical mods, the car came with a K&N so that was not my choice. I'm very proud of this car & it runs phenomenally well. When the manifold flange bothers me enough, I'll probably switch them out for headers, but I'm not going anywhere near the ECU. That's just my personal opinion.

A few nitpicks. The "false start" he experienced is completely normal and I hope like hell they got that oil temp up to operation before they just stood on the pedal on that dyno - that's a beautiful car on there and I wince when I see people ignoring their oil temps which isn't uncommon on the videos I've seen on this forum.
Old 10-17-20, 05:17 PM
  #6  
Jwconeil
Moderator
 
Jwconeil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,086
Received 972 Likes on 630 Posts
Default

My car has ran the most timing on stock tune with e30. Below 3k RPM table is 25.3 and above 3k is 24.8 KCLV consistently. My KFV is consistently at -3.0. I don’t know if the tunes mess with the timing, but they do mess with fuel mixture, which can create knock and reduce timing if not done correctly.
Old 10-18-20, 01:55 PM
  #7  
Joe Z
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joe Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Under an IS F since 2008
Posts: 13,441
Received 1,064 Likes on 586 Posts
Question Definitely more than meets the eye...

Originally Posted by Quadrphnia
...

A few nitpicks. The "false start" he experienced is completely normal and I hope like hell they got that oil temp up to operation before they just stood on the pedal on that dyno - that's a beautiful car on there and I wince when I see people ignoring their oil temps which isn't uncommon on the videos I've seen on this forum.
I just hope ALL the dynos were performed at Full Operational Temps for proper comparisons..

If the flash only took a few mins how did the oil temp bar drop to one bar..

Anywas I'm happy with my Factory NA Tune..

Joe Z
Old 10-19-20, 07:48 AM
  #8  
AlOtaBblGm
Pole Position
 
AlOtaBblGm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 270
Received 75 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

I could not be happier with my setup (and that says a bit).

RRR Tuned intake, elbow, hollowed primary cats and tune.

Yes there is a learning procedure that should be done to get the ECM optimized. RRR provides the info. Very easy. 6 pulls in 4th gear from 3,000 to 6,800 rpm. Once I completed that, the car had another level of "aggressive."

Still quite and comfortable with normal driving but just goes nuts when I stab it. The 7200 RPM redline is fantastic and the tune + hollowed cats sound incredible.
The following 5 users liked this post by AlOtaBblGm:
MileHIFcar (10-20-20), Positron (10-19-20), Rainheart (10-20-20), Rickna (10-21-20), RRRacing (10-20-20)
Old 10-20-20, 08:44 AM
  #9  
MileHIFcar
Pole Position
 
MileHIFcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,673
Received 405 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

Agreed! Never had any issues with my tune & tuned intake set-up night and day difference from stock
The following 3 users liked this post by MileHIFcar:
21ce (07-30-24), Positron (10-20-20), RRRacing (10-21-20)
Old 10-20-20, 11:19 AM
  #10  
jspecvtec
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
 
jspecvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 777
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

this is pretty accurate. a bunch of us socal guys who were the first to get the RRR tune when it came out made an average of ~10whp with the RRR tune. It was more noticeable for the mid range torque gain around 4-5k rpm
Old 10-20-20, 05:49 PM
  #11  
AlOtaBblGm
Pole Position
 
AlOtaBblGm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: CA
Posts: 270
Received 75 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Primary cat delete with tune and intake is a significant boost in power. My butt-dyno says 40hp easy (10%). If I had to put money on it I'd say right around 50-60hp 4,000-,7,000 RPM. I am also betting I will pass smog since I can reinstall the factory intake and everything looks 100% OEM.
Old 01-30-21, 10:21 AM
  #12  
Joe Z
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joe Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Under an IS F since 2008
Posts: 13,441
Received 1,064 Likes on 586 Posts
Exclamation

Well that didn't last long... Glad he sold it!!

He's know learning the true cost of ownership on German cars



Joe Z
The following users liked this post:
Rickna (01-30-21)
Old 01-30-21, 02:48 PM
  #13  
MileHIFcar
Pole Position
 
MileHIFcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,673
Received 405 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

Yea I think he had the car maybe 7 months if that?🤷‍♂️.....Yea buying the cheapest GT4 in the country with a salvage title was an interesting buy, but maybe it worked out for views on his channel. All I know and he probably would agree is that the ISF was way more reliable
Old 01-30-21, 04:51 PM
  #14  
Joe Z
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joe Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Under an IS F since 2008
Posts: 13,441
Received 1,064 Likes on 586 Posts
Exclamation

Originally Posted by MileHIFcar
Yea I think he had the car maybe 7 months if that?🤷‍♂️.....Yea buying the cheapest GT4 in the country with a salvage title was an interesting buy, but maybe it worked out for views on his channel. All I know and he probably would agree is that the ISF was way more reliable
According to this $2k repair bill just after 2 months of ownership. I would have to AGREE



Joe Z
Old 01-30-21, 05:45 PM
  #15  
Jwconeil
Moderator
 
Jwconeil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,086
Received 972 Likes on 630 Posts
Default

Those GT4s sure are quick around a track though.


Quick Reply: How Much Power Will a RR-Racing ECU Tune Make



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:26 AM.