C&D Numbers
#77
Yeah, I've never sat in one. Clearly what I've said so far are plain conjectures.
#78
Liquid Bra Champion
Not convinced. Aside from a 10-speed (why?) and slight bump (barely discernible) in power, the real distinctive difference is exterior and interior. Same analog clock, same weird infotainment interface (and you can't even change radio station while driving), same headlight bezel except the LED strip, and same spindle grille layout on the front. Slap the non-functional side "vent" fender pieces on and you have the GSF/RCF front end. Is this where all the 20K went? Also, 2+2 for the sake of insurance because the seats are utterly useless for anyone 6' tall. Don't even get me started on the center console - locked unless you slide it open for what appears to be "contemporary design" of cup holders. Passenger has three AC vents and driver has one + the one in the middle, what's the philosophy behind this?
Yeah, I've never sat in one. Clearly what I've said so far are plain conjectures.
Yeah, I've never sat in one. Clearly what I've said so far are plain conjectures.
Last edited by TimboIS; 09-14-17 at 11:28 PM.
#79
Not convinced. Aside from a 10-speed (why?) and slight bump (barely discernible) in power, the real distinctive difference is exterior and interior. Same analog clock, same weird infotainment interface (and you can't even change radio station while driving), same headlight bezel except the LED strip, and same spindle grille layout on the front. Slap the non-functional side "vent" fender pieces on and you have the GSF/RCF front end. Is this where all the 20K went? Also, 2+2 for the sake of insurance because the seats are utterly useless for anyone 6' tall. Don't even get me started on the center console - locked unless you slide it open for what appears to be "contemporary design" of cup holders. Passenger has three AC vents and driver has one + the one in the middle, what's the philosophy behind this?
Yeah, I've never sat in one. Clearly what I've said so far are plain conjectures.
Yeah, I've never sat in one. Clearly what I've said so far are plain conjectures.
V.
Last edited by Vitveet; 09-16-17 at 04:07 AM.
#80
Lexus Test Driver
RCF actually is not very competitive or on par with the M4. Recent test by Sport Auto Group at Hockenhiem had the M4 in 1:11s and the RCF in the 1:15s. That's a huge difference on a short track. 0-100 was 4.5 v. 5.2 (M4 has no traction 0-30) and a 3.3 second difference to 200 km/h. The RCF was a decent cruiser, but the difference between my F80 and my RCF is night and day performance wise.
#81
RCF actually is not very competitive or on par with the M4. Recent test by Sport Auto Group at Hockenhiem had the M4 in 1:11s and the RCF in the 1:15s. That's a huge difference on a short track. 0-100 was 4.5 v. 5.2 (M4 has no traction 0-30) and a 3.3 second difference to 200 km/h. The RCF was a decent cruiser, but the difference between my F80 and my RCF is night and day performance wise.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post