Official LF-A(II) thread (Will debut at Tokyo Auto Show, Lexus details Oct 20th, 8pm)
#1666
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Which changes nothing with regards to what the NSX did for the image of Honda and Acura. If you compare Honda's image in the 80s to their image in the 90s, there is quite a noticeable difference, and that is mainly thanks to the NSX. The NSX influenced other cars in Honda's lineup as other models became sportier as well.
The point of a halo car is supposed to express interest in the brand and bring other buyers not just to sell the halo car.
#1667
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would expect the usual posts saying how ludicrous that is because no one looking for a Roller would be shopping a Ferrari dealership. The argument against this bizarre and to me, unsustainable halo effect, is that I don't see very many people wandering into a Lexus dealership looking for a Ferrari (LF-A) and then deciding an RX400h is what they really want. Or getting an ES350 because they are so impressed with the fact that they can look at the LF-As in stock when they bring their car in for service.
Once again, not saying Toyota won't do it. But it also wouldn't surprise me if they decide there isn't sufficient gain to produce it. The closer a car gets to production, the more the costs escalate, dramatically. So regardless of what they have spent right now, depending on where it is in approval to be sold in various countries, it may make sense to put it on the shelf. Not like the masses are really waiting for it.
#1668
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
And the lack of any tangible income relative to the expense of making such a "halo" car is why so few people do it. Whatever Honda spent on the NSX, they didn't spend much while they produced it. And when it went away, they weren't exactly interested in having a follow up ready to go. The may make another one. They may not. This halo reasoning is just as dumb when you apply it to Toyota making the LF-A as the inverse would be for Ferrari to make a Rolls Royce because of all of them they could sell to the people who come in looking for a 612. And I could raise a much better argument that Ferrari shoppers would be more interested in a Ferrari Roller than an LF-A shopper would be interested in an IS.
I would expect the usual posts saying how ludicrous that is because no one looking for a Roller would be shopping a Ferrari dealership. The argument against this bizarre and to me, unsustainable halo effect, is that I don't see very many people wandering into a Lexus dealership looking for a Ferrari (LF-A) and then deciding an RX400h is what they really want. Or getting an ES350 because they are so impressed with the fact that they can look at the LF-As in stock when they bring their car in for service.
Once again, not saying Toyota won't do it. But it also wouldn't surprise me if they decide there isn't sufficient gain to produce it. The closer a car gets to production, the more the costs escalate, dramatically. So regardless of what they have spent right now, depending on where it is in approval to be sold in various countries, it may make sense to put it on the shelf. Not like the masses are really waiting for it.
I would expect the usual posts saying how ludicrous that is because no one looking for a Roller would be shopping a Ferrari dealership. The argument against this bizarre and to me, unsustainable halo effect, is that I don't see very many people wandering into a Lexus dealership looking for a Ferrari (LF-A) and then deciding an RX400h is what they really want. Or getting an ES350 because they are so impressed with the fact that they can look at the LF-As in stock when they bring their car in for service.
Once again, not saying Toyota won't do it. But it also wouldn't surprise me if they decide there isn't sufficient gain to produce it. The closer a car gets to production, the more the costs escalate, dramatically. So regardless of what they have spent right now, depending on where it is in approval to be sold in various countries, it may make sense to put it on the shelf. Not like the masses are really waiting for it.
I can't buy the M3 so I'll get the 328. It brings excitement to the brand itself. It's not that people who want to buy an LF-A and can will buy an IS instead. It's because it creates a buzz about the brand.
#1669
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Simple. People want to buy the high end performance cars but can't so instead they buy a car that's in the same family. People will buy BMW just so they can have the nameplate. People will buy Lexus for the same reason.
I can't buy the M3 so I'll get the 328. It brings excitement to the brand itself. It's not that people who want to buy an LF-A and can will buy an IS instead. It's because it creates a buzz about the brand.
I can't buy the M3 so I'll get the 328. It brings excitement to the brand itself. It's not that people who want to buy an LF-A and can will buy an IS instead. It's because it creates a buzz about the brand.
With all due respect to your post and in my opinion only, nonsense. Funny how people like to point to BMW or Mercedes about people going in looking for a M3 and leaving with a 335 or AMG and leaving with a E550. The kind of "halo" car we are talking about here is far more aking to those Cobalt sales that Chevy gets because they sell the Corvette.
Once again, Toyota may decide to bring the LF-A out, it is a non event to me. And study halls across the nation may go a twitter if they do. But I find it very credible to believe that they have either put it on hold or stopped it altogether to focus on what it is they really do for a living. Particularly with this economy. If you want to get people in the showroom, advertising will work a lot better than a "halo" car.
#1670
I do wonder though if the LF-A ends up being a perennial show-queen. We have seen it at multiple auto shows, now the roadster has been at Pebble Beach, and Lexus Aoyama, and the LF-A coupe is at Hong Kong...
#1671
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And the lack of any tangible income relative to the expense of making such a "halo" car is why so few people do it. Whatever Honda spent on the NSX, they didn't spend much while they produced it. And when it went away, they weren't exactly interested in having a follow up ready to go. The may make another one. They may not. This halo reasoning is just as dumb when you apply it to Toyota making the LF-A as the inverse would be for Ferrari to make a Rolls Royce because of all of them they could sell to the people who come in looking for a 612. And I could raise a much better argument that Ferrari shoppers would be more interested in a Ferrari Roller than an LF-A shopper would be interested in an IS.
I would expect the usual posts saying how ludicrous that is because no one looking for a Roller would be shopping a Ferrari dealership. The argument against this bizarre and to me, unsustainable halo effect, is that I don't see very many people wandering into a Lexus dealership looking for a Ferrari (LF-A) and then deciding an RX400h is what they really want. Or getting an ES350 because they are so impressed with the fact that they can look at the LF-As in stock when they bring their car in for service.
Once again, not saying Toyota won't do it. But it also wouldn't surprise me if they decide there isn't sufficient gain to produce it. The closer a car gets to production, the more the costs escalate, dramatically. So regardless of what they have spent right now, depending on where it is in approval to be sold in various countries, it may make sense to put it on the shelf. Not like the masses are really waiting for it.
I would expect the usual posts saying how ludicrous that is because no one looking for a Roller would be shopping a Ferrari dealership. The argument against this bizarre and to me, unsustainable halo effect, is that I don't see very many people wandering into a Lexus dealership looking for a Ferrari (LF-A) and then deciding an RX400h is what they really want. Or getting an ES350 because they are so impressed with the fact that they can look at the LF-As in stock when they bring their car in for service.
Once again, not saying Toyota won't do it. But it also wouldn't surprise me if they decide there isn't sufficient gain to produce it. The closer a car gets to production, the more the costs escalate, dramatically. So regardless of what they have spent right now, depending on where it is in approval to be sold in various countries, it may make sense to put it on the shelf. Not like the masses are really waiting for it.
Regardless of the expenses relating to the LF-A, Toyota feels it is worth it to make the car. A CL member in another post has said his dealership has received confirmation that the LF-A will definitely be produced.
I can guarantee you if BMW never had their M division, and the halo of the M division the M3 they would NOT have sold as many BMWs as they have in the past 20 years.
I personally know of people who were ready to do anything for a Ferrari Enzo, could not get one, and settled on an F430. Some of these people I know were new to the Ferrari brand so to speak.
The LF-A so far has been an auto show smash hit. The masses really love the concept of the LF-A. The cold hard fact is most people will never be able to own one, but if the masses merely dream of owning one than the LF-A will have already done it's job as a halo car. That in turn will elevate the Lexus brand overall due to so much word-of-mouth and the "dream car" from Lexus. This is something money can't buy, and marketing simply can't create. You need a truly unique and exceptional product combined with unique and exceptional appeal in order for it to become a "dream car" among the masses.
For example, I can easily picture some people wanting an LF-A, and instead settling on another F-brand car like an IS-F, or perhaps another F car that would be on the market in the future at that point. These would not necessarily be current Lexus owners, but mostly they would be new to the Lexus brand.
Once again, Toyota may decide to bring the LF-A out, it is a non event to me. And study halls across the nation may go a twitter if they do. But I find it very credible to believe that they have either put it on hold or stopped it altogether to focus on what it is they really do for a living. Particularly with this economy. If you want to get people in the showroom, advertising will work a lot better than a "halo" car.
#1672
Guest
Posts: n/a
For the record the NSX lost over 800 million
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...hlight=million
Attachment is not showing...
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...hlight=million
Attachment is not showing...
#1673
Guest
Posts: n/a
And I have to go with TRD that Lexus does NEED this car. Lets be real here, the ISc is a big yawn, the new RX while a techo marvel is another yawn and the HS250h while being a techno marvel, will be a big yawn.
The IS-F CLEARLY shows Lexus can produce SERIOUS vehicles. They really need to exploit the "F" marque or continue to be seen as an older/boring brand.
The IS-F CLEARLY shows Lexus can produce SERIOUS vehicles. They really need to exploit the "F" marque or continue to be seen as an older/boring brand.
#1674
Super Moderator
For the record the NSX lost over 800 million
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...hlight=million
Attachment is not showing...
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...hlight=million
Attachment is not showing...
#1675
#1676
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was thinking about this.... you think Toyota is delaying LF-A to give Honda some time to catch up on production of NSX so that they can debut both cars around same time.? Then, both will get huge marketing advantage. Not 1+1=2, but like 1+1=5 effect. Imagine all the marketing hype of NSX and LF-A coming together plus GTR V spec around same time, This news will be the talk of the year. just my speculation
#1679
LF-A lives...
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=136467
Lexus LF-A Supercar Gets Track Time in Japan
Date posted: 11-24-2008
OYAMA, Japan — Japan's race fans had a rare chance to see the Lexus LF-A in action this weekend, when the super secretive V10 sport coupe was demonstrated at Toyota's Motorsports Festival at Fuji Speedway.
This was the black "development" LF-A mule that ran in this summer's Nürburgring 24 Hours. Driving the car was Akio Toyoda, executive vice president of Toyota and one of the prime movers behind the LF-A program. In front of a crowd of 30,000, Akio did two laps in the LF-A, which made a great sound and was not short on pace.
Almost two years after the concept version's unveiling in Detroit, Toyota is still not saying when or if the LF-A will make it to production. Sources believe, however, that the production LF-A is now signed off, and this long awaited 480-horsepower, 200-mph supercoupe will appear at some strategic point in 2009, with a limited run of sales to start later, perhaps in 2010 or 2011.
The recent buzz in Tokyo has been that Toyota is thinking of a 500-unit run with an asking price that would be the equivalent of about $261,000-$313,000. Given the current economic climate, those numbers, and indeed the LF-A's whole future, could yet be revised.
All along, the LF-A has been pushed by Akio Toyoda, scion of the Toyoda family that founded the Toyota Motor Corporation, arch motorsport fan and the man widely tipped to be the next Toyota president and CEO. Without his support, the LF-A, which has always existed outside Toyota's normal production processes, would almost certainly have been canned.
Inside Line says: The LF-A could yet live to do battle with Nissan's GT-R and Acura's new NSX. — Peter Nunn, Correspondent
Date posted: 11-24-2008
OYAMA, Japan — Japan's race fans had a rare chance to see the Lexus LF-A in action this weekend, when the super secretive V10 sport coupe was demonstrated at Toyota's Motorsports Festival at Fuji Speedway.
This was the black "development" LF-A mule that ran in this summer's Nürburgring 24 Hours. Driving the car was Akio Toyoda, executive vice president of Toyota and one of the prime movers behind the LF-A program. In front of a crowd of 30,000, Akio did two laps in the LF-A, which made a great sound and was not short on pace.
Almost two years after the concept version's unveiling in Detroit, Toyota is still not saying when or if the LF-A will make it to production. Sources believe, however, that the production LF-A is now signed off, and this long awaited 480-horsepower, 200-mph supercoupe will appear at some strategic point in 2009, with a limited run of sales to start later, perhaps in 2010 or 2011.
The recent buzz in Tokyo has been that Toyota is thinking of a 500-unit run with an asking price that would be the equivalent of about $261,000-$313,000. Given the current economic climate, those numbers, and indeed the LF-A's whole future, could yet be revised.
All along, the LF-A has been pushed by Akio Toyoda, scion of the Toyoda family that founded the Toyota Motor Corporation, arch motorsport fan and the man widely tipped to be the next Toyota president and CEO. Without his support, the LF-A, which has always existed outside Toyota's normal production processes, would almost certainly have been canned.
Inside Line says: The LF-A could yet live to do battle with Nissan's GT-R and Acura's new NSX. — Peter Nunn, Correspondent