Bearings replaced for serp. tensioner and idler pulleys. Part numbers.
#17
Lexus Champion
this is why you want only Koyo, NTN, or NHK bearings and find the ones made in Japan!
bearings are highly counterfeited, so be sure to go to the manufacturers webpage and obtain the list of authorized dealers
bearings are highly counterfeited, so be sure to go to the manufacturers webpage and obtain the list of authorized dealers
Last edited by LScowboyLS; 12-25-13 at 11:29 AM.
#23
Ordered 6301-2RS and I should say it's narrower than original BD20-15DUL part, and besides it only seems to have one row of ***** inside
Unfortunately, the industry only makes 12x37mm bearings (ID/OD respectively) being 12mm wide and with single row of bearings. The 2301 series is 12x37mm two-row and 17mm wide but I don't know if it's applicable by other parameters
The original bearing has a sleeve depressed into its internal diameter, so it's actually two parts.
Unfortunately, the industry only makes 12x37mm bearings (ID/OD respectively) being 12mm wide and with single row of bearings. The 2301 series is 12x37mm two-row and 17mm wide but I don't know if it's applicable by other parameters
The original bearing has a sleeve depressed into its internal diameter, so it's actually two parts.
Last edited by GeorgeNVA; 05-05-15 at 04:19 AM.
#24
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
Ordered 6301-2RS and I should say it's narrower than original BD20-15DUL part, and besides it only seems to have one row of ***** inside
Unfortunately, the industry only makes 12x37mm bearings (ID/OD respectively) being 12mm wide and with single row of bearings. The 2301 series is 12x37mm two-row and 17mm wide but I don't know if it's applicable by other parameters
The original bearing has a sleeve depressed into its internal diameter, so it's actually two parts.
Unfortunately, the industry only makes 12x37mm bearings (ID/OD respectively) being 12mm wide and with single row of bearings. The 2301 series is 12x37mm two-row and 17mm wide but I don't know if it's applicable by other parameters
The original bearing has a sleeve depressed into its internal diameter, so it's actually two parts.
#28
Correct Part Number
For what it's worth . . . .
I must have missed something in this post that says there are actually TWO (2) bearings in the Tensioner Pulley.
The correct Part Number is: "6203 2RSJ". (NAPA part "BRG 62032RSJ", an SKF bearing).
http://www.napaonline.com/Catalog/Ca...RSJ_0446242543
Apparently it is a common bearing used for alternators, power steering, clutch pilot, generators, A/C compressors, etc.
Remember to buy TWO (2) of them.
I must have missed something in this post that says there are actually TWO (2) bearings in the Tensioner Pulley.
The correct Part Number is: "6203 2RSJ". (NAPA part "BRG 62032RSJ", an SKF bearing).
http://www.napaonline.com/Catalog/Ca...RSJ_0446242543
Apparently it is a common bearing used for alternators, power steering, clutch pilot, generators, A/C compressors, etc.
Remember to buy TWO (2) of them.
Last edited by drgerry; 10-19-15 at 06:21 AM. Reason: wrong pulley mentioned
#29
Awesome, thanks! My supplier lists it at clightly lower price than the assembled pulley. My original pulley had one 2-row bearing and a sleeve pressed into it. Should I keep the sleeve or "6203 2RSJ" already has the proper inner diameter?
#30
No, keep the sleeve. You will have to re-use it. The bearings are two separate items.
Yeah, you can get them for $6-$8 online, but I have to have it TODAY. Can't run the car without it. And I didn't know the correct part number until I took the old one out.
I never could find one with both bearings and sleeve in a single unit. You would think that the part number "6203DUL18", that the DUL part meant Dual?.(guess that makes too much sense)
Yeah, you can get them for $6-$8 online, but I have to have it TODAY. Can't run the car without it. And I didn't know the correct part number until I took the old one out.
I never could find one with both bearings and sleeve in a single unit. You would think that the part number "6203DUL18", that the DUL part meant Dual?.(guess that makes too much sense)