LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000) Discussion topics related to the 1990 - 2000 Lexus LS400

ECU interchange ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-15, 04:20 PM
  #1  
dicer
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default ECU interchange ?

This info was copied from the ECU thread.
===================================
As far as I investigate the variation of the ECU for the North American market, there are ECUs as follow.

ECU Part Number USA/CND Some for Taiwan
-----------------------------------------------
90-93 model
Part Number, Production Date, Model(Description)
89661-50010, 05/1989-08/1990
89661-50020, 05/1989-08/1990 W(TRACTION CONTROL)
89661-50030, 05/1989-08/1990 CALIFORNIA SPEC
89661-50031, 08/1990-09/1990
89661-50032, 09/1990-08/1992
89661-50040, 05/1989-08/1990 CALIFORNIA SPEC & W(TRACTION CONTROL)
89661-50041, 08/1990-09/1990 W(TRACTION CONTROL)
89661-50042, 09/1990-08/1992 W(TRACTION CONTROL)
89661-50140, 08/1992-01/1993
89661-50141, 01/1993-08/1993
89661-50142, 08/1993-10/1994
89661-50150, 08/1992-01/1993 CALIFORNIA SPEC
89661-50151, 01/1993-01/1994 CALIFORNIA SPEC
------------------------------------------------
========================================================================
So I thought all 90 to 92 ECU's would interchange that is if you have trac it needs to be trac ecu.
So how come some 92's fit 93's?

So does it mean that a 89661-50020 will interchange with a 89661-50042 ?

Last edited by dicer; 10-18-15 at 09:58 PM.
Old 10-18-15, 09:58 PM
  #2  
Yamae
Moderator
 
Yamae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,852
Received 893 Likes on 674 Posts
Default

There always were minor changes. Regarding the compatibility between different year models, Toyota/Lexus would clearly say, No. They'd say, "Use the same one except the one explained in the TIB".

Those who use a different ECU may kill their car in the worst scenario. But sometimes it shows a good result like to use a 96 ECU to a 95 model. It often improves the engine halt problem after the long high speed run.
Old 10-18-15, 10:00 PM
  #3  
dicer
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

So will the ones I mentioned interchange?
For that matter will all that say 90 to 92 interchange. Or are you saying we need to keep the production dates the same?
Old 10-18-15, 10:07 PM
  #4  
Yamae
Moderator
 
Yamae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,852
Received 893 Likes on 674 Posts
Default

I have no idea to judge.
Old 10-18-15, 10:35 PM
  #5  
dicer
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Okay a quick parts book study at Atlanta site.

These are the stock number listings and they match for all Trac 1990, 1991, and 1992 I did not look at 1993.
In other words these same numbers were listed for each year I called up, and a perfect match.

8966150042; 89661-50020; 89661-50040; 8966150020; 896615002084; 8966150040; 896615004084; 8966150041

So at least for the Trac ecu's they are all interchangeable in the years posted.
I'm glad because I have 2 spares that are 50040 and the one out of the high mile 90 is a 50020.
Old 10-21-15, 02:33 AM
  #6  
Yamae
Moderator
 
Yamae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,852
Received 893 Likes on 674 Posts
Default

Are you sure that the Atlanta site is fully authentic?
As I asked a friend of mine, in 1992, there were many big design changes such as the cold start injectors and the timer for those were not used any more. O2 sensors with a heater were also introduced. The evaporator system was changed too. How can the ECU handle those differences?
Old 10-21-15, 12:33 PM
  #7  
dicer
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

What ? Cold start injectors ? The 1990 has them. And for o2 sensors I just now looked on rock auto for Denso numbers, it is the same for 1990 and 1992. Now maybe in the JDM Cars all that was done I don't know. But the US ones are all the same any minor changes will be mention in the New car features book. The Atlanta site is a Lexus dealer so why wouldn't they be authentic? So just removed the front wire cover off my 92, it has the thermo switch for the cold start injector, and I also looked in the 1992 volume 1 shop manual and the component location picture shows a cold start injector.
There are some very small changes from 90 to 92, I think dual piston calipers were the big thing.

Last edited by dicer; 10-21-15 at 12:47 PM.
Old 10-21-15, 12:36 PM
  #8  
djamps
Intermediate
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 425
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I think Yamae is saying the method for controlling the cold start injectors changed among other differences. Not that they were new in '92.
Old 10-21-15, 01:10 PM
  #9  
dicer
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

So then why the same part numbers at the dealer?

Are those production dates for the cars or the ecu?
Old 10-21-15, 11:38 PM
  #10  
Yamae
Moderator
 
Yamae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,852
Received 893 Likes on 674 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dicer
What ? Cold start injectors ? The 1990 has them. And for o2 sensors I just now looked on rock auto for Denso numbers, it is the same for 1990 and 1992.
Of course the 1990 has them because it was in 1992 when cold start injectors were deleted. I often find that Rockauto sells something very strange. For an example, they sell spark plug cables for a 98 LS400. How can I trust them fully?
http://www.rockauto.com/catalog/x,ca...,parttype,7224

They list up something peculiar and I had many bad experiences with their list buying parts for a Mercedes 96 S500 which requires me to fix several times more often than my Celsior.

Last edited by Yamae; 10-21-15 at 11:45 PM.
Old 10-22-15, 01:20 AM
  #11  
dicer
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

My 1992 shop manual shows the cold start injector.


-----------------------------------------------
90-93 model
Part Number, Production Date, Model(Description)
89661-50010, 05/1989-08/1990
89661-50020, 05/1989-08/1990 W(TRACTION CONTROL)
89661-50030, 05/1989-08/1990 CALIFORNIA SPEC
89661-50031, 08/1990-09/1990
89661-50032, 09/1990-08/1992
89661-50040, 05/1989-08/1990 CALIFORNIA SPEC & W(TRACTION CONTROL)
89661-50041, 08/1990-09/1990 W(TRACTION CONTROL)
89661-50042, 09/1990-08/1992 W(TRACTION CONTROL)
89661-50140, 08/1992-01/1993
89661-50141, 01/1993-08/1993
89661-50142, 08/1993-10/1994
89661-50150, 08/1992-01/1993 CALIFORNIA SPEC
89661-50151, 01/1993-01/1994 CALIFORNIA SPEC
------------------------------------------------
So the above bold listing says this is 1990 through 1992, if something was discontinued in 1992 how come the same ecu was used?
My educated guess on this date deal is, there maybe some hardware and software updates from what the old 89661-50020 unit had, since all the other engine sensors and wiring remained the same, the newer units would be backward compatible and the new units would then contribute these new updates into the older manufacture date cars. Updates could be various operating regimes, fuel maps, timing etc.

Last edited by dicer; 10-22-15 at 01:46 AM.
Old 10-22-15, 02:23 AM
  #12  
Yamae
Moderator
 
Yamae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,852
Received 893 Likes on 674 Posts
Default

Aren't you mixing the model year an the Production Date?
Old 10-22-15, 02:43 AM
  #13  
dicer
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Okay then that could be 1991 model year to end of 92?
Old 10-22-15, 04:50 AM
  #14  
700bones
Rookie
 
700bones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: KENTUCKY (KY)
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LOL

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/ls-...ml#post9170397

Looks different from these, doesn't it?

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NjY1WDEwMDA=/z/vZIAAOxyBPZTh7uS/$_1.JPG




(that is simply the same one but the box is upside down).


I know the name and type of these style connectors in these pictures, but nobody knows the name of the second style from the post I linked. Even the resident "experts" are completely baffled, LOL!

Last edited by 700bones; 10-22-15 at 04:57 AM.
Old 10-22-15, 11:57 AM
  #15  
dicer
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
dicer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ca
Posts: 4,525
Received 97 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

I suppose the connectors would be a good indication of whether the ecu would work in said car or not. If Lexus was going to not have newer ones downward compatible then why not make it idiot proof and use different connectors. So are the connectors different from a Trac ecu versus a non trac ecu?


Quick Reply: ECU interchange ?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:27 AM.