JasonLax

Assuming no service records are available, what should I be looking for? I already know the basics (tires, straight frame) but what about anything else specifically on this car? And would I be making a big mistake if I bought an LS400 with 200k+ miles? I'm in Texas, so rust isn't much of an issue.

RA40

iTrader: (6)

Welcome to Club Lexus. Have you chosen a specific year?

There are a variety of discussions ongoing about potential purchases:

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/ls-...ve-a-list.html

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/ls-...994-ls400.html

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/ls-...-look-for.html

The FAQ will also have many of the fixes-maintenance that we've comes across over the years.
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/ls-...questions.html

JasonLax

I haven't. I'm looking to spend 4,000 max on the car itself and set aside around $1500 for any immediate repairs. Anything from 1990 to 2000 is fair game for me

dicer

Any year can give problems. But I think the least problems are with the 98 up. And more stuff on them too like remote windows etc. The older ones are getting to the point of needing lots of attention as I well know.

pmarr

Agree with dicer. I own a 98, 97 and a 91 LS400. There is a world of difference on the 98-00. 5 speed transmission is a major upgrade. Better mileage, quicker. Top of the line cars. If I were you I would not waste my time with anything earlier than a 98. Or drive a 97 first. Then you will know.

dicer

I drove a 98 and I liked it. But I'm stuck in a time warp sorta.

RA40

iTrader: (6)

The one with the best maintenance history in the 95+. Good care they are 300K range capable. Poor care and neglect, it will lead to frustration and spending to fix. Fluids are critical in keeping the engine, tranny, power steering and brake system happy.

Legender

Bought a 98 with 200k on it and less than optimum maintenance practices but the exterior was great with no wrecks and the interior was immaculate. Took almost $3k to get her up to speed but extremely happy with the car and the ride. Engine was solid just had some p/s, alternator, mounts and timing belt needs along with valve covers. But I knew what I was getting into as this was my 4th one and just wanted a nice daily for my 20 miles round trip to work. Works perfect for that. I too, would recommend the 98 and above, just for the headlights and tranny if nothing else.

addisonblc

iTrader: (4)

I too, am huntimg OP.
Good luck to you

KJG92

My son could probably be talked into selling his 92. I was told that was the way to go due to the non interference motor.

Daspyda

iTrader: (1)

Have you tried searching for records on the Lexus website? You can use the VIN for a search.

Stereorob

+1 on what dicer said. the early ones are getting so old now they are bordering on classic/antique status and nomatter how well kept, they are beginning to need help more regularly, the drivetrains in the early ones are rock solid, but weird stuff is starting to break on them. plus finding a unmolested example that hasn't been thrashed around and neglected is almost impossible to find. 95-97s are a pretty safe bet, but still getting older, and it seems that generation is more prone to electrical problems and suffer from ECU issues. 98+ are old enough to be very affordable but still new enough to be reliable as DDs.

however, the early 1st gens (90-92) seem the most solid, the best handling, and the most fun to drive, atleast to me.

jaaa

I bought my 96 in july and have already had to fix several coolant leaks, power steering leaks and replace the starter, tensioner pulley, and alternator. Not even mentioning both motors in the steering wheel.

pmarr

jaaa,
was this your neighbor's 'beater' that you have been referring to?

Rdrcr

Agreed.

My '96 was awesome!

Mike