LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000) Discussion topics related to the 1990 - 2000 Lexus LS400

What would you pay for a 1995 Ls400 with 30,000 miles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-19 | 03:32 PM
  #31  
LS400FAN's Avatar
LS400FAN
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 228
Likes: 29
From: wi
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
i hear you... is it also possible that you and your wife have different driving styles haha

and i totally wouldn't blame anyone for having their reasons to prefer the '95, but to me it still mostly comes down to the 98 being a considerable performance increase over the 97, and the 99 is the one i inherited so i'm definitely biased toward it lol...

but yes just by the law of averages, the 98 has more things to go wrong on it... but even something like the electronic throttle control still has total reliability built into it, since even though it's electric, there's still a physical cable connected to the pedal so you always have some kind of mechanical backup available
haha you are correct, we do have different driving styles (which is probably why I've replaced her brake pads more frequently). That said, I am starting to see more age-related issues with my "95, for example within just the past 12 months I've replaced the gas tank, brake lines, power steering lines, and both rear brake calipers all due to rust and corrosion. Sooner or later I know the fuel lines are going to be next (ughh!!) But what the heck the beast is 24 yrs old, its not quite the young whippersnapper it used to be Amazingly, the body is still rust-free after 24 Wis. winters, go figure. Good luck with your 99LS.
Old 02-22-19 | 04:45 PM
  #32  
AandSC's Avatar
AandSC
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 264
Likes: 8
From: FL
Default

A 97 LS400 with 21,000 miles just sold for $17,000 on BAT. Those that think these are $5,000 cars are not in tune with the market. Also, thinking a low mileage car is nothing but trouble is a mistake. I picked up my 2000 with 33,000 miles almost four years ago and have since added 45,000 trouble free miles. Just routine maintenance and a timing belt/water pump three years ago. One of the most trouble free cars I’ve ever owned. The rubber, seats, etc are still supple and like new.

Not a lot of nice, low mile examples left out there, so if you want one you’re going to pay more for it.
Old 02-22-19 | 04:48 PM
  #33  
Sin1UZFE's Avatar
Sin1UZFE
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 66
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by AandSC
A 97 LS400 with 21,000 miles just sold for $17,000 on BAT. Those that think these are $5,000 cars are not in tune with the market. Also, thinking a low mileage car is nothing but trouble is a mistake. I picked up my 2000 with 33,000 miles almost four years ago and have since added 45,000 trouble free miles. Just routine maintenance and a timing belt/water pump three years ago. One of the most trouble free cars I’ve ever owned. The rubber, seats, etc are still supple and like new.

Not a lot of nice, low mile examples left out there, so if you want one you’re going to pay more for it.
For that price people would rather get a 460. 400s are awsome but not worth 17k....to most
Old 02-22-19 | 05:01 PM
  #34  
AandSC's Avatar
AandSC
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 264
Likes: 8
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Sin1UZFE
For that price people would rather get a 460. 400s are awsome but not worth 17k....to most
I get that point of view, but i would rather have a low mile 400 than an equal price high mile 430 or 460.
Old 02-22-19 | 06:11 PM
  #35  
Fit1too's Avatar
Fit1too
Advanced
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 594
Likes: 125
From: Indiana
Default

At 17K, it would have to be a time capsule. Perfect—and I mean P-E-R-F-E-C-T. I still would not pay that. I’d like to have a 05-06 430, but the 460 is a whole different ball game. I’d love a 2011 or 2012 model, but I’m not in that financial bracket yet.
Old 02-23-19 | 09:18 AM
  #36  
sha4000's Avatar
sha4000
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,858
Likes: 340
From: N.Y.
Default

Originally Posted by AandSC


I get that point of view, but i would rather have a low mile 400 than an equal price high mile 430 or 460.
That 400 has nothing on the 460 other than nostalgia for lots of owners and less failure points. My 460 drives so much better than my 400 at this stage in their lives.
Old 02-23-19 | 06:37 PM
  #37  
LS400FAN's Avatar
LS400FAN
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 228
Likes: 29
From: wi
Default

Originally Posted by AandSC
A 97 LS400 with 21,000 miles just sold for $17,000 on BAT. Those that think these are $5,000 cars are not in tune with the market. Also, thinking a low mileage car is nothing but trouble is a mistake. I picked up my 2000 with 33,000 miles almost four years ago and have since added 45,000 trouble free miles. Just routine maintenance and a timing belt/water pump three years ago. One of the most trouble free cars I’ve ever owned. The rubber, seats, etc are still supple and like new.

Not a lot of nice, low mile examples left out there, so if you want one you’re going to pay more for it.
Congrats on your LS400, and best of luck. As much as I love my 400s, just like others on this bd I'm inclined to go the 460 rte for that price, but it all comes down to what makes YOU happy because its your money. That said, good luck and enjoy, treat it right and it will last forever. Yes, there is a nostalgic quality about the 400, who knows, in the future they may be worth more than the 460's......I know that's a stretch but what the heck
The following users liked this post:
sha4000 (02-24-19)
Old 02-23-19 | 06:52 PM
  #38  
Sin1UZFE's Avatar
Sin1UZFE
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 66
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by AandSC


I get that point of view, but i would rather have a low mile 400 than an equal price high mile 430 or 460.
Of course high mileage 460 is miles ahead of almost many of the competition low miles. 200k 460 is barely breaking in
Old 02-23-19 | 07:51 PM
  #39  
Sherl's Avatar
Sherl
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 649
Likes: 63
From: TX
Default

This problem is multi-fold. If a 460 breaks its going to cost you a lot to fix when compared to 400. The only thing that in most 400 would break against 460 is that aging material in rubber and what not. Apart from that a low mileage metal is preferred if you're willing to pay but apparently it ends up being a matter of choice as you never know what might break when something hasn't been used at and you start putting miles on it. I would settle with a well maintained car than anything else, after all these are consumables lol.

Last edited by Sherl; 02-23-19 at 08:03 PM.
The following users liked this post:
sha4000 (02-24-19)
Old 02-23-19 | 07:52 PM
  #40  
Sin1UZFE's Avatar
Sin1UZFE
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 66
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Sherl
This problem is multi-fold. If a 460 breaks its going to cost you a lot to fix when compared to 400. The only thing that in most 400 would break against 460 is that aging material in rubber and what not. Apart from that a low mileage metal is preferred if you're willing to pay but apparently it ends up being a matter of choice as you never know what might break when something hasn't been used at and you start putting miles on it. I would settled with a well maintained car than anything else, after all these are consumables lol.
You bring up a good point, however with the 460 parts don't require much hunting down
The following users liked this post:
sha4000 (02-24-19)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
YODAONE
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
1
09-22-18 06:22 PM
landon1850
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
13
10-13-16 01:59 PM
BeLSNow111
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
30
10-21-15 07:58 AM
JWise
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
2
10-21-05 11:54 AM
Shaffer
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
7
07-17-03 09:36 PM



Quick Reply: What would you pay for a 1995 Ls400 with 30,000 miles



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 AM.