LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006) Discussion topics related to the flagship Lexus LS430
View Poll Results: Fuel Type?
Regular
26
12.32%
Midgrade
25
11.85%
Premium
160
75.83%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

The Mother of all LS430 Fuel Threads: Regular, Midgrade, or Premium? (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-27-08 | 07:42 AM
  #121  
sparky3's Avatar
sparky3
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 529
Likes: 3
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by miniz
gas (regular 87) destroy anything on an LS430? I've had Mercedes and they are very specific in letting you know that anything besides premium is forbidden. Mercedes claims it will significantly reduce the life of your catalytic converters and be harmful to your overall engine health. With gas prices out of control, I'd like to run the LS mainly on regular, then toss in a tank of premium every now and then. I understand the performance might be hindered by a slight amount and it might reduce overall mileage, but will it actually harm the car by running it on regular?'

And yes I have done a search and couldn't find anything specific to my question.

Thank you!
Not saying these guys aren't correct, but I've been running mine with 87 for over a year and a half with NO problems. I can't get 91 here in Ohio; it's either 87, 89, or 92/93/94 which is about 20 cents higher per gallon. I drive about 15k per year, so at an overall 20 MPG it's about $1.00 cheaper per hundred miles, or $150 cheaper per year. So I've saved roughly $225 in 18 months with the cheap stuff. Now that I think about it, maybe I should just run premium. LOL.

I owned a 1998 GS 300 straight 6 and ran 87 in it for over 5 years and it purred like a kitten the day I sold it, and I have no regrets.

I think modern cars can adjust for cheaper gas, but that's just me.
No knocking and pinging for me either. My 2004 runs just fine on 87 (but I can see the argument the other way too). I'm a cheap person really.
Old 06-27-08 | 08:17 AM
  #122  
GeorgeT's Avatar
GeorgeT
Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 1
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by LEX012006
I used 87 in my 400 all of the time, for almost 1000,000 miles and I had no problems o2's or the cat converter. When I got rid of it to purchase my 430 (hell of a car!!!!!!) it was still running very good. But as blacksc400 stated, how much are you saving per tankful? My 430 is way too valuable to me to even possibly risk any long term damage, not to mention since it is a UL, a much better car. Besides that I making a little more money now so why take the chance. But if you must, the manual states you can use 87 octane, "IF" 91 octane is not available (Sunoco carries 91 octane). Therefore as per the manufacturer, you can use the cheaper stuff, but only once in a while. NOT all the time!!!!!
WOW !! A million miles without replacing the cats or O2 sensor is amazing!!!
Perhaps you meant 100,000 miles?
Old 06-27-08 | 08:42 AM
  #123  
twojayzee's Avatar
twojayzee
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 6
From: Emerald City
Default

Originally Posted by sparky3
...

I think modern cars can adjust for cheaper gas, but that's just me.
No knocking and pinging for me either. My 2004 runs just fine on 87 (but I can see the argument the other way too). I'm a cheap person really.
Im a cheap bastard too but if you can afford a 430 why save 250bux a year on gas ? Thats like 20bux a month if you drive 15k miles a year and pay 4.80 for 91 vs 4.50 for 87. Anyway your right modern cars do adjust for crappy gas...to an extent. You wont hear knocking or pinging usually these days, but the ecu is retarding the timing and dumping more fuel in to compensate.

Originally Posted by GeorgeT
WOW !! A million miles without replacing the cats or O2 sensor is amazing!!!
LOL I saw that too
Old 06-27-08 | 09:14 AM
  #124  
CG lover's Avatar
CG lover
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 1
From: St. Peters, Missouri
Default

I have run regular in my Benz, Beamers and now my 430 with nary a problem over the last 15 years,, I do not hot foot it so not worried about how much power it can make,,

the cost of the fule is not the issue, I just do not like paying the oil companies and the Saudis the extra $$ to further line their pockets,,

we all run our own bath water,, go for the premium if ya feel the need,,
Old 06-27-08 | 11:39 AM
  #125  
sparky3's Avatar
sparky3
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 529
Likes: 3
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by CG lover
I have run regular in my Benz, Beamers and now my 430 with nary a problem over the last 15 years,, I do not hot foot it so not worried about how much power it can make,,

the cost of the fule is not the issue, I just do not like paying the oil companies and the Saudis the extra $$ to further line their pockets,,

we all run our own bath water,, go for the premium if ya feel the need,,
Another thing to consider - I was reading on the MB forums about several cars getting a large amount of water in their tanks from getting 94 at the pumps - apparently the theory is hardly anyone is getting premium fuel due to the price of gas and the premium is getting "stagnant" since hardly anyone is buying it.

Who knows. I will run 87 and not worry about it. If you guys see me at a light you can beat me 0-60 by a few milliseconds with your premium fuel!
Old 06-27-08 | 11:41 AM
  #126  
sparky3's Avatar
sparky3
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 529
Likes: 3
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by twojayzee
but the ecu is retarding the timing and dumping more fuel in to compensate.
I will conduct a road test to find out how much better (if at all) I get on 94 Octane gas. This will take a while as I still have a half tank left of the cheap stuff.

Standby!
Old 06-27-08 | 01:54 PM
  #127  
campisi's Avatar
campisi
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 430
Likes: 10
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by sparky3
Not saying these guys aren't correct, but I've been running mine with 87 for over a year and a half with NO problems. I can't get 91 here in Ohio; it's either 87, 89, or 92/93/94 which is about 20 cents higher per gallon. I drive about 15k per year, so at an overall 20 MPG it's about $1.00 cheaper per hundred miles, or $150 cheaper per year. So I've saved roughly $225 in 18 months with the cheap stuff. Now that I think about it, maybe I should just run premium. LOL.

I owned a 1998 GS 300 straight 6 and ran 87 in it for over 5 years and it purred like a kitten the day I sold it, and I have no regrets.

I think modern cars can adjust for cheaper gas, but that's just me.
No knocking and pinging for me either. My 2004 runs just fine on 87 (but I can see the argument the other way too). I'm a cheap person really.
I AM saying these guys are incorrect! The car will do just fine on regular gas. It won't knock and you won't ruin your O2 or your cat and you won't get less MPG. There's no 'trash' in reg grade gas (LMAO at that one) - as a matter of fact now that gas is so expensive the premium gas sits in the underground tanks for far longer than reg grade. You're probably getting stale gas when you buy premium. Your car may be a little slower when you drag race it, though, and that's SO important.
Old 06-27-08 | 04:37 PM
  #128  
usermel's Avatar
usermel
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 3
From: Virginia
Smile What about the grade of Gas in between?

What do you other members think about him using the grade between premium and 87? I myself only use premium but, respect those who are frugal and want to save. Any thoughts on him using the grade in between?

L.G.N.M
Old 06-27-08 | 05:32 PM
  #129  
CG lover's Avatar
CG lover
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 321
Likes: 1
From: St. Peters, Missouri
Default

my son works part time at one of the more popular stations and they have seen the sale of premium dropping off to almost nothing,, when it was .10 to .15 cents different most did not give it a thought but now the spread is .40 cents plus and is making a difference along with the $4 a gallon price for regular,, he has heard some of the stations were discussing not selling premium as their sales were now so small and concern about the gas laying for long periods in the tanks,,

would expect when crude reaches the $170 a barrel and we are paying in the $5 to $6 area for regular the spread will even be more and premium may become hard to obtain,,

Last edited by CG lover; 06-28-08 at 09:56 AM.
Old 06-28-08 | 07:41 AM
  #130  
gs eddy's Avatar
gs eddy
Rookie
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

I know that Lexus builds some bullet proof motors and all. But the fact is, so does Toyota. (if u wanted to be frugal at the pump, why weren't you frugal when you bought your ride.) there's a reason that Lex requires the premium....they're built to higher specs.... Like guns for example, the "ak47" very reliable, cheap to make, built with loose specs.(is why you can drag it through mud,sand,etc and it still fires.) then there's the m16 or HKmp5, precision built, close tolerances, needs more maintenance. (if dirty, will jam.) now when said guns are put to an accuracy test, the AK is not even close to the m16 or mp5. when you want precision performance and quality, you must perform precise maintenance.
Old 06-28-08 | 07:49 AM
  #131  
sparky3's Avatar
sparky3
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 529
Likes: 3
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by gs eddy
I know that Lexus builds some bullet proof motors and all. But the fact is, so does Toyota. (if u wanted to be frugal at the pump, why weren't you frugal when you bought your ride.) there's a reason that Lex requires the premium....they're built to higher specs.... Like guns for example, the "ak47" very reliable, cheap to make, built with loose specs.(is why you can drag it through mud,sand,etc and it still fires.) then there's the m16 or HKmp5, precision built, close tolerances, needs more maintenance. (if dirty, will jam.) now when said guns are put to an accuracy test, the AK is not even close to the m16 or mp5. when you want precision performance and quality, you must perform precise maintenance.
That analogy is pretty bad. Do you work for the service dept at Lexus? I drove Toyotas for years; I didn't get to this point financially by throwing my money away, which is what you could be doing by spending money on Ultra 94. I'll take the cheaper, always "fresh" 87 octane, while you guys blow your motors with stale gas.
Old 06-28-08 | 09:33 AM
  #132  
usermel's Avatar
usermel
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 3
From: Virginia
Smile Respect!

We should all respect each others choice to use whatever grade of gas we as adults decide to. Can we please stop attacking each other on this site because we disagree and have adult convo's and respect each others choices. If we disagree, lets respectfully disagree! Lets remember nothing we disagree about when it comes to grade of gas is worth arguing about. Think about it,its about grades of gas we use, chill!

L.G.N.M
Old 06-28-08 | 08:48 PM
  #133  
twojayzee's Avatar
twojayzee
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 6
From: Emerald City
Default

Originally Posted by sparky3
you could be doing by spending money on Ultra 94...
Shi* if we had 94 here I would be stoked
Old 06-28-08 | 09:17 PM
  #134  
LEX012006's Avatar
LEX012006
Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Question.........

What is the difference between "fresh" 87 octane & "stale" 91 octane and higher fuel?

We all know that the knock sensors in newer model vehicle control the "pinging" & "knocking" sound we hear from the engine when a low octane gas is used. But what is the damage/dangers, if any, for using "stale" gas?

A few of you have commented on 91 and higher sits in the tanks longer (I guess you all are presuming this "fact") but would there be a problem if the fellas in this thread who decides to "waste" there money on premium, would we have any long term problems?

Just curious!!
Old 06-28-08 | 09:23 PM
  #135  
twojayzee's Avatar
twojayzee
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,996
Likes: 6
From: Emerald City
Default

Originally Posted by LEX012006
Question.........

What is the difference between "fresh" 87 octane & "stale" 91 octane and higher fuel?

We all know that the knock sensors in newer model vehicle control the "pinging" & "knocking" sound we hear from the engine when a low octane gas is used. But what is the damage/dangers, if any, for using "stale" gas?

A few of you have commented on 91 and higher sits in the tanks longer (I guess you all are presuming this "fact") but would there be a problem if the fellas in this thread who decides to "waste" there money on premium, would we have any long term problems?

Just curious!!
It takes a lot to make fuel stale. Gasoline is very volitile. I hardly consider any fuel available at a local chevron or shell stale. Think about how long it sits before durning and after the refining process. It takes years before fuel will varnish. The premium pumps around here are empty as often as the regular fuel. The local stations often have yellow empty bags on multiple pump handles at the same time.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:23 PM.