Does NF210 = negative camber wear?
04-07-11, 07:29 PM
#1
Rookie
Thread Starter
Does NF210 = negative camber wear?
From searching it looks like those lowered on Tanabe NF210 springs have out of spec negative camber on the rear.
1) Is the only remedy to get the shortest lower control arms?
2) Does this bring it back in spec?
3) How bad is the negative camber tire wear? Maybe w/ rotations (remount and balance) I could live w/ it.
I've got the springs and am almost attempted to run just the fronts combined w/ the stock rear 'sport' springs.
This might look goofy. Someone talk some sense into me.
1) Is the only remedy to get the shortest lower control arms?
2) Does this bring it back in spec?
3) How bad is the negative camber tire wear? Maybe w/ rotations (remount and balance) I could live w/ it.
I've got the springs and am almost attempted to run just the fronts combined w/ the stock rear 'sport' springs.
This might look goofy. Someone talk some sense into me.
04-16-11, 04:17 PM
#3
Rookie
Thread Starter
Well in response to my own question whether NF210 = excessive negative camber the answer is yes and no. According to the alignment spec sheet the Left side is okay at -1.55, but the Right is at -2.3 degrees. The tire guy said I could probably be okay w/ tire wear if I rotated/flipped tires.
I'm just gonna order the right rear lower 441mm bar just so my brain isn't out of alignment.
By the way the stance is much better...way easier to tell the diff between my wife's RX SUV and the LS now.
Friggin' keys still look the same. And I concur w/ everyone who says the ride is definitely not harsher than the stock springs. In fact it feels as if the Tanabes may even be a bit smoother than the stock 'sport' springs. Nice.
I'm just gonna order the right rear lower 441mm bar just so my brain isn't out of alignment.
By the way the stance is much better...way easier to tell the diff between my wife's RX SUV and the LS now.
Friggin' keys still look the same. And I concur w/ everyone who says the ride is definitely not harsher than the stock springs. In fact it feels as if the Tanabes may even be a bit smoother than the stock 'sport' springs. Nice.
04-17-11, 06:23 AM
#5
Pole Position
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got any pictures?
Well in response to my own question whether NF210 = excessive negative camber the answer is yes and no. According to the alignment spec sheet the Left side is okay at -1.55, but the Right is at -2.3 degrees. The tire guy said I could probably be okay w/ tire wear if I rotated/flipped tires.
I'm just gonna order the right rear lower 441mm bar just so my brain isn't out of alignment.
By the way the stance is much better...way easier to tell the diff between my wife's RX SUV and the LS now. Friggin' keys still look the same. And I concur w/ everyone who says the ride is definitely not harsher than the stock springs. In fact it feels as if the Tanabes may even be a bit smoother than the stock 'sport' springs. Nice.
I'm just gonna order the right rear lower 441mm bar just so my brain isn't out of alignment.
By the way the stance is much better...way easier to tell the diff between my wife's RX SUV and the LS now.
Friggin' keys still look the same. And I concur w/ everyone who says the ride is definitely not harsher than the stock springs. In fact it feels as if the Tanabes may even be a bit smoother than the stock 'sport' springs. Nice.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
98GS400GUY
Suspension and Brakes
11
03-24-10 10:05 PM
