LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006) Discussion topics related to the flagship Lexus LS430

Interesting Mpg driving cross country ls430

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-13, 06:41 PM
  #16  
AlexusAnja
Lead Lap
 
AlexusAnja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 4,178
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jayclapp
Has everyone forgotten that the UL hunkers down an inch at curise and that decreases the Cd to 0.25. That's a decrease of 3.85%. That means the drag on the UL is 3.85% less. That should affect the gas mileage by the same amount, meaning that a 22 mpg average for a non-UL, the UL will have 22.84 mpg.
I think that might be offset by the additional weight of the UL, which is why we don't hear even better numbers than about 27 mpg.
Old 04-04-13, 09:15 PM
  #17  
Jabberwock
Moderator
 
Jabberwock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,902
Received 209 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexusAnja
I think that might be offset by the additional weight of the UL, which is why we don't hear even better numbers than about 27 mpg.
On the UL what the lower COD giveth, the grand bateau luxo barge door closers and rear seat butt massage taketh away....
Old 04-05-13, 08:33 AM
  #18  
jayclapp
Lexus Champion
 
jayclapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,489
Received 106 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jabberwock
On the UL what the lower COD giveth, the grand bateau luxo barge door closers and rear seat butt massage taketh away....
Don't forget about the extra weight from the addition rear A/C plumbing, ducting, blower, etc.
Old 04-05-13, 02:00 PM
  #19  
MDSC
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
MDSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Extra motors for cooled rear seat , rear fridge , laser cruise , reclining rear seat motors etc It all adds up
Old 04-07-13, 06:31 AM
  #20  
toyo
Intermediate
 
toyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Georgia
Posts: 289
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Drove a total of 3871 miles last week. Average mileage was 26.9. That's not too shabby considering I was in the mountains of CO. On the open road I could not detect a mileage difference weather I ran 75 or 85. Very interesting.

Last edited by toyo; 04-07-13 at 02:47 PM.
Old 04-07-13, 09:24 AM
  #21  
ls430lover
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
ls430lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Ca
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

another testament to the engineering in this vehicle glad your home safe
Old 04-07-13, 07:19 PM
  #22  
V8_Fan
Racer
 
V8_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexusAnja
I think that might be offset by the additional weight of the UL, which is why we don't hear even better numbers than about 27 mpg.
During a recent 300 mile trip from east of Albuquerque to Socorro west to the VLA and back, I averaged 28.5 mpg going 75mph (cruise). Normally, my drive to work is 44mi round trip with about 2300 ft of climbing with a mix of interstate and state highway driving. I typically average 26mpg. When I lived in AZ and drove between Tucson and Phoenix (flat, 220 mi round trip), I'd average about 27.5 mpg going 75-80 mph, which is consistent with the numbers posted here. One key to fuel efficiency is to get into 6th gear. The vehicle needs to be 55-60 to be in 6th. If you drive 45, fuel economy will definitely be worse than at 60.
Old 04-08-13, 06:49 AM
  #23  
ls430lover
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
ls430lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Ca
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

jim would love to be in sixth gear, but 2001-2003 only had a five speed automatic transmission
cheers
Old 04-23-13, 01:21 AM
  #24  
malrafe3i
Driver
 
malrafe3i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: bahrain
Posts: 82
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

thanx for the advise broo but my country is having the short distance so i only ride it once in a while
Old 07-09-13, 07:56 PM
  #25  
fensterlip
Pole Position
 
fensterlip's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Did A Bit Better in Texas on the 20

I was headed from Dallas to El Paso and then on to LA.
When in Texas, with their gas I was averaging right around 30mpg consistently on the dash monitor with the cruise control set at 80.
Got into California and the Cali gas pushed me down to 27mpg even at 70mph
Old 07-20-13, 12:02 AM
  #26  
harryford
Driver School Candidate
 
harryford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jayclapp
I notice that the car's Cd of 0.26 is mentioned. Has everyone forgotten that the UL hunkers down an inch at curise and that decreases the Cd to 0.25. That's a decrease of 3.85%. That means the drag on the UL is 3.85% less. That should affect the gas mileage by the same amount, meaning that a 22 mpg average for a non-UL, the UL will have 22.84 mpg. There's been a lot of discussion about gas mileage, but I don't remember anyone considering that the UL is in a different category. Just saying.
That is not the same thing. I am sure the mpg is improved; but there are many, many more things that go into mpg than just COD. Just because our cars have a better cod than a chevy volt(.28) does not mean it gets better gas mileage.

The fact that the car looks like a floating boat and yet is so aerodynamic is really mind boggling to me!
Old 07-20-13, 11:27 AM
  #27  
jayclapp
Lexus Champion
 
jayclapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,489
Received 106 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by harryford
That is not the same thing. I am sure the mpg is improved; but there are many, many more things that go into mpg than just COD. Just because our cars have a better cod than a chevy volt(.28) does not mean it gets better gas mileage.

The fact that the car looks like a floating boat and yet is so aerodynamic is really mind boggling to me!
I'm talking about the effect of drag on the mpg (or other cars for that matter).

Aerodynamic drag is a function of the air density, speed of the air flowing into the car, frontal area of the car and the drag coefficient (Cd). The UL in it's lowered condition has a lower Cd than a non-UL that is an inch higher at the same conditions. Hence, the UL will have less drag and consequently an improved mpg.

Trust me, I'm a retired Aerospace Engineer.
Old 07-22-13, 07:26 AM
  #28  
chunkyda
Pole Position
 
chunkyda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I have an Excel spreadsheet that I track every fill-up as well as every expense on my 2005 LS430 since I got it in Jan 2009. The largest effect on my gas milage is Air Conditioner use. Since I live in FL the A/C is in use most of the year but I have a historical trend of getting 23.5 in the winter and 21.5 in the summer to and from work. In the winter I do manually turn off the A/C from the climate screen unless it is particularily humid outside. In my 89,000 miles I have averaged 22.67 mpg.
Old 07-22-13, 09:12 AM
  #29  
jayclapp
Lexus Champion
 
jayclapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,489
Received 106 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chunkyda
I have an Excel spreadsheet that I track every fill-up as well as every expense on my 2005 LS430 since I got it in Jan 2009. The largest effect on my gas milage is Air Conditioner use. Since I live in FL the A/C is in use most of the year but I have a historical trend of getting 23.5 in the winter and 21.5 in the summer to and from work. In the winter I do manually turn off the A/C from the climate screen unless it is particularily humid outside. In my 89,000 miles I have averaged 22.67 mpg.
Have you plotted the data on a chart? That's the best way to "see" the data. Sounds like you have done that. Long term data such as you have is the very best way of actually "knowing" the gas mileage of your car.

It also allows you to detect any sudden change which might indicate a problem with the engine.
Old 07-22-13, 11:54 AM
  #30  
AlexusAnja
Lead Lap
 
AlexusAnja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 4,178
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Just my experience and I have no scientific proof except my vehicle behavior but from my driving experience, I get better mpg going 75~80 mph with cruise than 65 mph with cruise. I don't believe our most efficient range is 55 or even 65 mph. Again, i can't prove either way as both scenarios are not under the same controlled environment.


Quick Reply: Interesting Mpg driving cross country ls430



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:46 AM.