Need advice timing belt. Ls430
#16
the number is zero as far as I recall. One guy surfaced a couple years ago on this forum but as I recall never came back with definitive post mortim on his engine.
there have been a couple failure instances over on the IH8MUD forum for LX470s but no engine damage, thus causing an intense debate on whether these engines are truly interference.
personally, i'd wait for 90k and not worry about it, which is exactly what i'm doing with my 05.
there have been a couple failure instances over on the IH8MUD forum for LX470s but no engine damage, thus causing an intense debate on whether these engines are truly interference.
personally, i'd wait for 90k and not worry about it, which is exactly what i'm doing with my 05.
#17
OP, FWIW, I changed mine out at 102k and 9 years old, looked not new, but nonetheless in great shape. I guess I got the deal of the century bc Lexus of Knoxville only charged me 960 (plus tax).
#18
Before anyone throws a fit and thinks I'm telling them not to change the timing belt at the recommended interval, CALM DOWN. That's not what I'm saying. With that said, I have known several people that have had vehicles with timing belts. One of my friends has a 2000 Honda Civic with 360k miles and has never replaced the timing belt or water pump. Another friend has a Camry with over 200k miles and never replaced the timing belt. I have several friends with Ford Rangers with the 2.3L and well over 200 and 300k miles without ever doing the timing belt and I've never known anyone to have one break. I'M NOT SAYING IT CAN'T HAPPEN but climate, use, if the vehicle is garaged etc all play a role in the lifespan. If the timing belt isn't done at 90k I personally don't believe it is that big of a deal. Just my $0.02.
#20
The timing belts are not known to break but they have and when they do it is catastrophic to the engine. I have only read about them breaking to those who ignore it and it's usually past 200k miles. Not an issue if you replace it at least once.
#24
Now that you are at about 270K are you going to replace it again or wait longer?
#25
There are many, many others who didn't / don't change TB at 90K. However, if you are getting symptoms of a leaking water pump, then I wouldn't hesitate to change it. If you drive hard, fast accelerations from stop, often WOT, that's different too. The fact remains, everyone who changes at 90K discovers a barely worn belt.
#27
My belt looked ok at 110k when I changed it. Upon further inspection it had 3 bad teeth (you could see the underlying cords)and was actually considerably thinner than the new belt. The aluminium belt covers were covered in a thin layer of very fine "belt dust". Also my idler pulley was noisy, no play or seal rupture but it wouldn't have trusted it for much longer. My car was/is a lifetime AZ car so maybe the extra heat got to it.
#28
My belt looked ok at 110k when I changed it. Upon further inspection it had 3 bad teeth (you could see the underlying cords)and was actually considerably thinner than the new belt. The aluminium belt covers were covered in a thin layer of very fine "belt dust". Also my idler pulley was noisy, no play or seal rupture but it wouldn't have trusted it for much longer. My car was/is a lifetime AZ car so maybe the extra heat got to it.