LS430 fuel economy
#1
LS430 fuel economy
this is interesting, even though a small sample, seems reliable.
http://www.fuelly.com/car/lexus/ls430
I have only about 30k tracked, but my overall is 19.3 mpg, again in the ballpark. I think it is truly not bad for a 2000 designed 8 cyl. engine--that's 19 y.o. technology.
To me, there is a direct correlation between avg mph and avg mpgs. The lower the avg mph, the lower the avg mpgs. Mine tends to be in the ballpark of 20-23 mph which is low, indicative of a lot of stop and go suburban and urban driving. Very little highway.
http://www.fuelly.com/car/lexus/ls430
I have only about 30k tracked, but my overall is 19.3 mpg, again in the ballpark. I think it is truly not bad for a 2000 designed 8 cyl. engine--that's 19 y.o. technology.
To me, there is a direct correlation between avg mph and avg mpgs. The lower the avg mph, the lower the avg mpgs. Mine tends to be in the ballpark of 20-23 mph which is low, indicative of a lot of stop and go suburban and urban driving. Very little highway.
#3
And that's not bad for your M4. My 335i used to be 21.7 under the same circumstances (identical commute over 8 years) as the LS430's 19.x But as of late my 335i has dipped into the 19's too. I think it needs a walnut blast likely my intake valves are caked. My 1998 Maxima was the same 21.7. Imagine the 1998 had 190 HP and 205 ft. lbs., and the 2007 300 HP and 300 ft. lbs., identical on the fuel...
#4
I haven't put many miles on my new 2006 (maybe 500), but I was curious about the gas mileage that I would get with this car. I traded in a 2001 Highlander, so I figured it wouldn't take much to beat what I had. Nonetheless, I do a fair amount of highway driving, and I was hoping that I'd settle in around 25-27, as multiple owners said that they were getting high 20's on the highway. So far, I'd say about 65-70% of my driving has been on the highway and my dash says that my tank avg have been 22.7 and 23.1. I could probably eek out a little more, but sometimes it sure is tempting to step on the gas just to feel how smooth it accelerates. My previous Highlander had some pickup, but you definitely noticed that you were trying to accelerate.
#7
On a trip the switch gets set on econ. Cruise on at 70 to 80 (texas) I get 25 to 28 at the pump depending on winds.
Just a great used car that, imo, looks terrific without shouting.
Trending Topics
#8
Here's mine which covers March 2017 through Sept. 2018
http://www.fuelly.com/car/lexus/ls43.../n84434/596138
54,382 miles and over $6,000 dollars spent on gas in 18 months, which is why I had to sell it....
http://www.fuelly.com/car/lexus/ls43.../n84434/596138
54,382 miles and over $6,000 dollars spent on gas in 18 months, which is why I had to sell it....
#9
2005 LS 430:
Over the last 12 months, 5,500 miles mix of city and highway, 23.6 average mpg. At a steady state of 50-55 mph on level ground the car gets about 31. My best tank so far: 29 mpg. Worst tank: 20.5. Highway speed limits around where I live are 50-60.
My daily driver, 2013 VW Passat TDI, gets about double the mpg.
Over the last 12 months, 5,500 miles mix of city and highway, 23.6 average mpg. At a steady state of 50-55 mph on level ground the car gets about 31. My best tank so far: 29 mpg. Worst tank: 20.5. Highway speed limits around where I live are 50-60.
My daily driver, 2013 VW Passat TDI, gets about double the mpg.
#11
14-18 country driving very hilly when I am in a city like Albany I get 16-19, the car is stored for the winter time so that reflects on the mileage also. My rx330 gets 17-20 for reference it is driven year round.
Last edited by 05ls430518; 12-24-18 at 02:50 PM.
#13
The 0.25 Cd only applies to the UL (which has air suspension), which lowers the height of the car by approximately an inch at driving speed.
#14
The body was also more aerodynamic than previous LS sedans (Cd 0.26; 0.25 with air suspension), and was the product of wind tunnel testing at facilities used for Shinkansen bullet train development.
I think this is a big reason why 430 can get ~28mpg while cruising at 70mph.