View Poll Results: Favorite Brand of Gasoline
ExxonMobill
6
10.53%
Shell
20
35.09%
Texaco
3
5.26%
Chevron
19
33.33%
Sunoco
0
0%
QuikTrip
2
3.51%
76
1
1.75%
BP
5
8.77%
ConocoPhilips
0
0%
Hess
1
1.75%
Voters: 57. You may not vote on this poll
Favorite Brand of Gasoline
#16
Hmmm ... that wasn't my experience on my 3500-mile trip. In fact, my wife and I discussed the fact that at 80mph on the interstate I got 29-30 mpg and when we took some secondary highways at 65-70mph I got closer to 27-28. Not a huge difference, but enough to notice.
And BTW - it wasn't because of traffic or little towns slowing us down - much of the secondary stuff was in the wastelands of Nevada (between Las Vegas and Tonopah, where there's little or nothing). I WAS afraid of police lurking out there, though, just to snare over-confident drivers, so I stuck to the lower speeds.
Fuel economy v. speed is a complex science, having to do with gearing, coefficient of drag, engine optimization and other factors. It's not a slam-dunk to say higher speeds automatically translate to lower gas mileage. I recall my BMW's actually got better mileage at 80-85 than at 65-70, too!
.
.
And BTW - it wasn't because of traffic or little towns slowing us down - much of the secondary stuff was in the wastelands of Nevada (between Las Vegas and Tonopah, where there's little or nothing). I WAS afraid of police lurking out there, though, just to snare over-confident drivers, so I stuck to the lower speeds.
Fuel economy v. speed is a complex science, having to do with gearing, coefficient of drag, engine optimization and other factors. It's not a slam-dunk to say higher speeds automatically translate to lower gas mileage. I recall my BMW's actually got better mileage at 80-85 than at 65-70, too!
.
.
I have no idea why you were getting better gas mileage at higher speeds. But in my experience, I know for a fact that when I am going 65 or 70 as opposed to 80 or 85, I get better gas mileage. It is not just on this recent trip that I have noticed this but on every trip that I have taken with the LS. I wonder if your situation has anything to do with the dryness of the air and altitude. I seem to recall from many years ago when we took a trip to the Desert Southwest and the southern Rockies that my gas mileage was amazingly good for that car (Mustang, Mach 1).
#17
Lexus Test Driver
Mike,
I have no idea why you were getting better gas mileage at higher speeds. But in my experience, I know for a fact that when I am going 65 or 70 as opposed to 80 or 85, I get better gas mileage. It is not just on this recent trip that I have noticed this but on every trip that I have taken with the LS. I wonder if your situation has anything to do with the dryness of the air and altitude. I seem to recall from many years ago when we took a trip to the Desert Southwest and the southern Rockies that my gas mileage was amazingly good for that car (Mustang, Mach 1).
I have no idea why you were getting better gas mileage at higher speeds. But in my experience, I know for a fact that when I am going 65 or 70 as opposed to 80 or 85, I get better gas mileage. It is not just on this recent trip that I have noticed this but on every trip that I have taken with the LS. I wonder if your situation has anything to do with the dryness of the air and altitude. I seem to recall from many years ago when we took a trip to the Desert Southwest and the southern Rockies that my gas mileage was amazingly good for that car (Mustang, Mach 1).
The BMW was obviously optimized for "autobahn" travel, so it's not too surprising it settled into its most efficient zone at high speeds, and I rather suspect the LS is similar.
I can't explain why my experience with the LS is different from yours, but I stand by it.
.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kl323
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
32
08-12-11 01:40 PM