My new 07 LS460L
01-28-11, 04:43 PM
#48
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vietnam, Saigon
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm just curious about the exceptional option from Arabia, but it's actually softer than the LS460 which I have tried on before. The Semi aniline leather is nice but crumples so easily, when getting out and in the car, I always have to take care of the seats lest the leather will be crumpled.
02-09-11, 08:14 AM
#54
Lexus Test Driver
Wow, congratulations! I usually go back to Viet Nam with my family every four or five years. Last time was in 2007 so we're almost due to go back again. I've always held the belief that if you want to see many newer BMWs and Mercedes (and nice cars in general) to spend a day in Saigon and you'll get all the eye candy you could want.
It's amazing the number of cars, and nice cars, that are here considering how expensive they are.
It's amazing the number of cars, and nice cars, that are here considering how expensive they are.
02-09-11, 08:34 AM
#55
Wow, congratulations! I usually go back to Viet Nam with my family every four or five years. Last time was in 2007 so we're almost due to go back again. I've always held the belief that if you want to see many newer BMWs and Mercedes (and nice cars in general) to spend a day in Saigon and you'll get all the eye candy you could want.
It's amazing the number of cars, and nice cars, that are here considering how expensive they are.
It's amazing the number of cars, and nice cars, that are here considering how expensive they are.
02-10-11, 02:24 AM
#56
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vietnam, Saigon
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you are about to go to Saigon, don't miss the new residential district Phu My Hung. Meet me there and will show you the Beverly Hills of Vietnam.
02-10-11, 02:03 PM
#57
Wow, congratulations! I usually go back to Viet Nam with my family every four or five years. Last time was in 2007 so we're almost due to go back again. I've always held the belief that if you want to see many newer BMWs and Mercedes (and nice cars in general) to spend a day in Saigon and you'll get all the eye candy you could want.
It's amazing the number of cars, and nice cars, that are here considering how expensive they are.
It's amazing the number of cars, and nice cars, that are here considering how expensive they are.
A little off topic here, but what I don't understand is if this is a communist country and everybody is equal and shares everything, how can some people be so rich other other people be so poor? I recently saw a program hosted by Piers Morgan on Shanghai and he showed the same dichotomy, some people fabulously weathy and most others incredibly impoverished. I thought that is what communism was supposed to correct.
02-10-11, 03:29 PM
#58
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Nevada
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I LOVE Saigon, went there a couple of years ago and had a blast! i didnt roll in any pimp cars, but i did pay some guy to haul me around behind his bicycle...i had never been before, but i was impressed at how clean the city was and how many western restaraunts and shops there were. would go again in a heartbeat. Anyway, your car is beautiful!
02-10-11, 03:51 PM
#59
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vietnam, Saigon
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those "sharing" and "equal" ideas are in theory only. In fact, one's money is always one's money. Since money is hard to get, there is no such thing as sharing money with the less rich ones.
02-10-11, 03:59 PM
#60
Lexus Test Driver
A little off topic here, but what I don't understand is if this is a communist country and everybody is equal and shares everything, how can some people be so rich other other people be so poor? I recently saw a program hosted by Piers Morgan on Shanghai and he showed the same dichotomy, some people fabulously weathy and most others incredibly impoverished. I thought that is what communism was supposed to correct.