LS - 4th Gen (2007-2017) Discussion topics related to the current flagship models LS460, LS460L and LS600H

45k miles oil analysis report - Pennzoil Ultra Platinum against Toyota full syn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-17, 10:48 AM
  #16  
Oliver Enterprises
Former Sponsor
 
Oliver Enterprises's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 207 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FatherTo1
and the belief that "if it ain't broke...".
All good points. Your consideration of the filter would tend to give me pause as well. And I certainly agree with you about life getting in the way of an OCI. I've been 500 miles from an oil change, with a 1,200 mile road trip to happen in a day or 2, and just didn't have time to prep and do the work. So, I see where you're coming from...
Old 08-07-17, 04:46 PM
  #17  
Doublebase
Pole Position
 
Doublebase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,560
Received 355 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by satiger
Just curious know, how do you know Toyota changed/changes their oil additives/ingredients?. As such its a mystery to many who actually makes those TGMO for Toyota/Lexus. Many theories floats in the web world pointing to Mobile, Pennzoil etc. I personally haven't seen any official document / article from Toyota/Lexus stating their source...........
Just based off oil analysis posted on bobs the oil guy. And then reading through the posts on the threads. I can't remember the exact moly count but it certainly was lower than before. Someone suggested that maybe they are now using a higher quality moly and thus the reason for the lower numbers, not sure about that one.
Old 08-07-17, 04:48 PM
  #18  
Doublebase
Pole Position
 
Doublebase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,560
Received 355 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roadfrog
Interesting. I wonder if this is very recent, as my Blackstone analysis showed a ton of moly still in the oil. I'm tempted to send a virgin sample of the TGMO oil to them for analysis. TGMO used to have up to 1000 ppm of moly. Whereas Mobil 1 was a fraction of that. Toyota used to make a big deal of the requirement of high moly in their oils. I know they use more titanium now.
II wasn't all that recent, and it was on bobs the oil guy. Yeah I'd be curious to see what a virgin sample would look like right now.
Old 08-08-17, 05:11 AM
  #19  
danielTRLK
Lead Lap
 
danielTRLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 435
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roadfrog
How does WIX compare to Blackstone? Recent info seems to poo-poo on Blackstone as being almost useless for accurate info.

Also, TGMO is famous for it's very high Moly. How did the Pennzoil compare? I can't open the file here at my work.
More limited than Blackstone.

88ppm for the Moly in regular mobil 1. I dislike Moly in oils, makes it tough to read piston rings and compression rings as they wear.

All of these samples come back limited. There is no indication for fuel, water, active additive, oxidation, nitration, viscosity at 40c, the index, and a few others. Seeing ppms of any additive has little meaning if you can't tell if it's active.

Whoever said that most oils are the same is truthfully right. Exxon and Shell both co-own Infinuem. Infinuem makes the additives and formulations for just about........everyone........Most off the shelf oils are almost identical in performance
Old 08-08-17, 05:30 AM
  #20  
Doublebase
Pole Position
 
Doublebase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,560
Received 355 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danielTRLK
More limited than Blackstone.

88ppm for the Moly in regular mobil 1. I dislike Moly in oils, makes it tough to read piston rings and compression rings as they wear.

All of these samples come back limited. There is no indication for fuel, water, active additive, oxidation, nitration, viscosity at 40c, the index, and a few others. Seeing ppms of any additive has little meaning if you can't tell if it's active.

Whoever said that most oils are the same is truthfully right. Exxon and Shell both co-own Infinuem. Infinuem makes the additives and formulations for just about........everyone........Most off the shelf oils are almost identical in performance
I believe blackstone provides an indicator to let you know how much active additives you have remaining, is it TBN or TAN? I can't remember, but they give you oil change interval length advise based off that figure (and other things). Not that I use blackstone - I just change my oil between 5-7k regardless.
Old 08-08-17, 02:36 PM
  #21  
danielTRLK
Lead Lap
 
danielTRLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 435
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doublebase
I believe blackstone provides an indicator to let you know how much active additives you have remaining, is it TBN or TAN? I can't remember, but they give you oil change interval length advise based off that figure (and other things). Not that I use blackstone - I just change my oil between 5-7k regardless.
It's optional to purchase TBN for $10, which measures the base stocks ability to fight acid, put simply. The problem with TBN is that it's neither reflective of the additive packs in the oil, nor do most base stocks break down before the additive does. The additives will almost always be depleted, before the base stock is no longer holding up.

Blackstone is a very bad guide for OCI length, they don't have much data nor do they know how to interpret it properly. On other posts here, I routinely have caught Blackstone making large mistakes. They're nice people though.

To measure additives, you need something called FTIR. FTIR shows you the oil at the molecular level vs. the atomic level. Allowing you to see, if that 2500ppm of zinc/phos is really active or if it's depleted. You can have 2500ppm of zinc and have sheared out additives that no longer function.
The following users liked this post:
2013FSport (08-29-17)
Old 08-09-17, 05:41 AM
  #22  
Doublebase
Pole Position
 
Doublebase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,560
Received 355 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danielTRLK
It's optional to purchase TBN for $10, which measures the base stocks ability to fight acid, put simply. The problem with TBN is that it's neither reflective of the additive packs in the oil, nor do most base stocks break down before the additive does. The additives will almost always be depleted, before the base stock is no longer holding up.

Blackstone is a very bad guide for OCI length, they don't have much data nor do they know how to interpret it properly. On other posts here, I routinely have caught Blackstone making large mistakes. They're nice people though.

To measure additives, you need something called FTIR. FTIR shows you the oil at the molecular level vs. the atomic level. Allowing you to see, if that 2500ppm of zinc/phos is really active or if it's depleted. You can have 2500ppm of zinc and have sheared out additives that no longer function.
Interesting and I've read that these reports do little in helpi you understand if your engine is wearing normally, that true? Supposedly their tests can't pick up metals that are larger, therefore you wouldn't know if things like rings, etc where actually wearing. I don't know if that's true or not because if rings were wearing abnormally, wouldn't the smaller particles be in larger numbers? I would think that would indicate something.

But like I said I don't use any analysis on my oil, I just buy whatever brand name is on sale and change it between 5-7k miles (and I'm a lot closer to 5k than 7k). Truthfully in most cars the body and subframe will rust away before the engine will have internal problems. There are millions of cars in the junkyards with engines that are fine, it's everything else you need to worry about. Lol.
Old 08-09-17, 07:28 AM
  #23  
danielTRLK
Lead Lap
 
danielTRLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 435
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doublebase
Interesting and I've read that these reports do little in helpi you understand if your engine is wearing normally, that true? Supposedly their tests can't pick up metals that are larger, therefore you wouldn't know if things like rings, etc where actually wearing. I don't know if that's true or not because if rings were wearing abnormally, wouldn't the smaller particles be in larger numbers? I would think that would indicate something.

But like I said I don't use any analysis on my oil, I just buy whatever brand name is on sale and change it between 5-7k miles (and I'm a lot closer to 5k than 7k). Truthfully in most cars the body and subframe will rust away before the engine will have internal problems. There are millions of cars in the junkyards with engines that are fine, it's everything else you need to worry about. Lol.
No, it's just Blackstone really doesn't know what they're doing. the wear metals are done on an ICP machine so between 1-5 microns is what it will read. If you have wear bigger than 5 microns, ya got a big problem, literally LOL.

Blackstone doesn't have enough background to make sense of what's happening to give you good advice, ever notice all there reports say the same? 0% fuel, go longer, oil looks good. Never once have I seen them suggest a corrective action. What's the point of UOA then? Alas, they don't care, people keep coming to them. Maybe it's because they make people feel good about their cars and oil.

I beg to differ, lots of issues on cars today. Ecoboost, GDI's, TDI's to name a few. Popping engines at 100K like crazy.
Old 08-09-17, 08:59 AM
  #24  
Doublebase
Pole Position
 
Doublebase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,560
Received 355 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danielTRLK
No, it's just Blackstone really doesn't know what they're doing. the wear metals are done on an ICP machine so between 1-5 microns is what it will read. If you have wear bigger than 5 microns, ya got a big problem, literally LOL.

Blackstone doesn't have enough background to make sense of what's happening to give you good advice, ever notice all there reports say the same? 0% fuel, go longer, oil looks good. Never once have I seen them suggest a corrective action. What's the point of UOA then? Alas, they don't care, people keep coming to them. Maybe it's because they make people feel good about their cars and oil.

I beg to differ, lots of issues on cars today. Ecoboost, GDI's, TDI's to name a few. Popping engines at 100K like crazy.
I have noticed that, their reports all sort of sound the same.

And you're right, over the past five years or so there has been a lot of engine problems creeping up from various manufacturers. What we have witnessed is new technology that hasn't been refined yet...direct injection, light weight oils, cylinder shut off, turbos, higher compression, less ring tension...on and on for the never ending quest to improve fuel economy and get the most performance out of tiny engines as possible. And the owners are paying the price. But they will figure it out and we will look back at this time period and say...remember when direct injection first came out and manufactures were trying to meet CAFE regulations? Those were tough times.
The following users liked this post:
danielTRLK (08-10-17)
Old 08-10-17, 01:48 AM
  #25  
danielTRLK
Lead Lap
 
danielTRLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 435
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doublebase
I have noticed that, their reports all sort of sound the same.

And you're right, over the past five years or so there has been a lot of engine problems creeping up from various manufacturers. What we have witnessed is new technology that hasn't been refined yet...direct injection, light weight oils, cylinder shut off, turbos, higher compression, less ring tension...on and on for the never ending quest to improve fuel economy and get the most performance out of tiny engines as possible. And the owners are paying the price. But they will figure it out and we will look back at this time period and say...remember when direct injection first came out and manufactures were trying to meet CAFE regulations? Those were tough times.
Not sure where that came out of, I've been trying to explain to many on this forum that is exactly what's happening. It's usually happening after 100,000 and lots of people on this forum don't keep cars that long. so the third and forth owners get the car dumped on them. This is why oil, fuel and filter selection are so critical.
Old 08-10-17, 07:17 AM
  #26  
satiger
Instructor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
satiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 850
Received 90 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danielTRLK
Not sure where that came out of, I've been trying to explain to many on this forum that is exactly what's happening. It's usually happening after 100,000 and lots of people on this forum don't keep cars that long. so the third and forth owners get the car dumped on them. This is why oil, fuel and filter selection are so critical.
Well said. Few years of ownership doesn't require good quality oil/fuel/fluids. But if one is planning to keep past 100k especially past 200k, these play a big role. Combined 450k miles on my ES and GX, both absolutely don't have leak, burning oil, discoloration etc etc..

Absolute test to such condition is to take the car to dealership and have them do an inspection on what needs to be repaired/replaced. As one can expect, they would fill in paperwork with all possible things that can be done hoping owner would approve at least half of those if not all. If they report tire may need a replacement or brake components need a replacement, it speaks volumes . On ES they reported tires may need change in future during last oil changes, on GX nothing!.

I attribute that condition first to Toyota engineering then to maintaining them with good quality oil/fluids and OEM parts.

I got to disagree on one point mentioned in this thread, that all oils are same. They are NOT. Same goes with fuels, no two brand fuels are same ( I posted a long reply while back explaining how refining industry works) . I always like to try something new. Few times I use Castrol Edge in my GX. One of the best oil I have used. GX loves that oil. During cold start and in drive, it purrs like a kitten. I couldn't even hear that massive V8 inside the cabin. None of other oils exhibit the same behavior in GX. However ES didn't show that kind of different behavior with Castrol Edge.

GX was so much quite with Castrol Edge, my Uncle who rode in GX and LS said that GX seems much quitter than LS !!!!. I couldn't disagree with him because I felt the same.
Old 08-10-17, 07:36 AM
  #27  
danielTRLK
Lead Lap
 
danielTRLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 435
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by satiger
Well said. Few years of ownership doesn't require good quality oil/fuel/fluids. But if one is planning to keep past 100k especially past 200k, these play a big role. Combined 450k miles on my ES and GX, both absolutely don't have leak, burning oil, discoloration etc etc..

Absolute test to such condition is to take the car to dealership and have them do an inspection on what needs to be repaired/replaced. As one can expect, they would fill in paperwork with all possible things that can be done hoping owner would approve at least half of those if not all. If they report tire may need a replacement or brake components need a replacement, it speaks volumes . On ES they reported tires may need change in future during last oil changes, on GX nothing!.

I attribute that condition first to Toyota engineering then to maintaining them with good quality oil/fluids and OEM parts.

I got to disagree on one point mentioned in this thread, that all oils are same. They are NOT. Same goes with fuels, no two brand fuels are same ( I posted a long reply while back explaining how refining industry works) . I always like to try something new. Few times I use Castrol Edge in my GX. One of the best oil I have used. GX loves that oil. During cold start and in drive, it purrs like a kitten. I couldn't even hear that massive V8 inside the cabin. None of other oils exhibit the same behavior in GX. However ES didn't show that kind of different behavior with Castrol Edge.

GX was so much quite with Castrol Edge, my Uncle who rode in GX and LS said that GX seems much quitter than LS !!!!. I couldn't disagree with him because I felt the same.
Acoustic theory is what you are experiencing and this is valid but it doesn't mean the engine is performing any better. It just means quieter, this doesn't translate into less wear.

Most off the shelf oils while chemically not 100% identical, typically perform the same. This is because the company that makes them is making cookie cutter formulas that work on a broad variety of vehicles, requirements, etc. Every vehicle responds differently to different oils, so UOA is the only true way to tell if there's been an increase in performance or decrease.

Anyways, looks like electric will seize a large portion of the market soon anyways.
Old 08-27-17, 11:34 AM
  #28  
Persocon
Driver
 
Persocon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: colorado
Posts: 90
Received 29 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I used to believe different oil is just marketing but if all oils are the same, why does my engine (140k mi) completely stops consuming when I switched to TGMO 0w20, and I have experimented with mobil,royal purple, liquimoly, between those brands also switched between 0w20, 0w30 none of them stops oil consumption. Only case was slowing consumption, when I added 1.7 quarts of Rislone engine treatment, but it only slowed the consumption rate down to 1/3 quart every 1,000 mi

Last edited by Persocon; 08-27-17 at 02:45 PM.
Old 08-27-17, 07:39 PM
  #29  
danielTRLK
Lead Lap
 
danielTRLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 435
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Persocon
I used to believe different oil is just marketing but if all oils are the same, why does my engine (140k mi) completely stops consuming when I switched to TGMO 0w20, and I have experimented with mobil,royal purple, liquimoly, between those brands also switched between 0w20, 0w30 none of them stops oil consumption. Only case was slowing consumption, when I added 1.7 quarts of Rislone engine treatment, but it only slowed the consumption rate down to 1/3 quart every 1,000 mi
well you'll never know if you don't have a UOA done by an analyst who knows what he's doing.

2. If that oil provides solid ring seal that others couldn't provide then that's why. RP, Mobil 1 and liquidmoly are nothing spectacular. They're like cheap android phones. It's why UOA is needed, so you can see what oil you need.

for the most part off the shelf oils are mostly the same. While there are some differences they mostly perform the same.
Old 08-27-17, 08:10 PM
  #30  
Persocon
Driver
 
Persocon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: colorado
Posts: 90
Received 29 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

I do have a UOA done on the mobil 0w20 but from what others have said about blackstone, I doubt it's useful.


Quick Reply: 45k miles oil analysis report - Pennzoil Ultra Platinum against Toyota full syn



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 AM.