Does the LX have enough power?
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
I hear ya VQ, but if I can pay 15k and 55k for basically the same thing, that bugs me a lil. I agree, Chevy/GMC trucks are very tough but who honestly drives ANY Escalade over anything resembling dirt?
Only what, 800 LXs sold a month, that is exclusivity!
LX has never lost any SUV comparo for those interested. Never. Even though it is not involved in the HP wars, the overall package makes it a winner all the time.
Only what, 800 LXs sold a month, that is exclusivity!
LX has never lost any SUV comparo for those interested. Never. Even though it is not involved in the HP wars, the overall package makes it a winner all the time.
#32
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
I hear ya VQ, but if I can pay 15k and 55k for basically the same thing, that bugs me a lil. I agree, Chevy/GMC trucks are very tough but who honestly drives ANY Escalade over anything resembling dirt?
I hear ya VQ, but if I can pay 15k and 55k for basically the same thing, that bugs me a lil. I agree, Chevy/GMC trucks are very tough but who honestly drives ANY Escalade over anything resembling dirt?
[i]Only what, 800 LXs sold a month, that is exclusivity![/B]
[i]LX has never lost any SUV comparo for those interested. Never. Even though it is not involved in the HP wars, the overall package makes it a winner all the time. [/B]
#33
HP again
"I agree that pretty much nothing can touch the LX in terms of refinement, and it is a winner. But if I was going to plop down 60k for an SUV, it wouldn't be one that's outpowered by almost every 6 cylinder SUV costing less than half the price. Today people demand serious performance from even SUV's, and in that area the LX falls way short."
Am I missing something here? I was not aware that 'almost every 6 cylinder SUV' can go 0 to 60 in 9.9sec. Is that right? To the best of my knowledge -- very few, if any. Not even very many V8-ts.
And nobody talks 'torque' here either? Why not to just look it up in the papers?
Am I missing something here? I was not aware that 'almost every 6 cylinder SUV' can go 0 to 60 in 9.9sec. Is that right? To the best of my knowledge -- very few, if any. Not even very many V8-ts.
And nobody talks 'torque' here either? Why not to just look it up in the papers?
#34
Re: HP again
Originally posted by AKoch
"I agree that pretty much nothing can touch the LX in terms of refinement, and it is a winner. But if I was going to plop down 60k for an SUV, it wouldn't be one that's outpowered by almost every 6 cylinder SUV costing less than half the price. Today people demand serious performance from even SUV's, and in that area the LX falls way short."
Am I missing something here? I was not aware that 'almost every 6 cylinder SUV' can go 0 to 60 in 9.9sec. Is that right? To the best of my knowledge -- very few, if any. Not even very many V8-ts.
And nobody talks 'torque' here either? Why not to just look it up in the papers?
"I agree that pretty much nothing can touch the LX in terms of refinement, and it is a winner. But if I was going to plop down 60k for an SUV, it wouldn't be one that's outpowered by almost every 6 cylinder SUV costing less than half the price. Today people demand serious performance from even SUV's, and in that area the LX falls way short."
Am I missing something here? I was not aware that 'almost every 6 cylinder SUV' can go 0 to 60 in 9.9sec. Is that right? To the best of my knowledge -- very few, if any. Not even very many V8-ts.
And nobody talks 'torque' here either? Why not to just look it up in the papers?
Most competent SUV's of today are faster than 9.9. And even if they wern't, the LX is simply average in terms of performance. For 60k, I want more than adequate. The X5 does it in 6.6, the Escalade does it in 7.4, the ML500 in 6.8, and to prove my "V6 point", the new Bravada (w/ 270hp) does it in 7.9. Almost every decent SUV I can think of outpowers and outperfroms (in performance) the LX. Even dismal Isuzu matches the LX in horsepower. Ford's SUV's beat it, even the sloppy Expedition(9.6) BTW, the V8 Explorer does it in 8 flat. The last three I mentioned don't even compare to the LX, but they perform better, which is all I was trying to say. For the money Lexus wants for it, they need to get HP competitive. Throw in a 300+HP motor and it would be on my list.
#35
To VQ
"Throw in a 300+HP motor and it would be on my list"
See what happens.....
- Option one: 300+HP with the same engine size will result in less torque, and less then ideal torque curve. Bad for off-road, and bad for all-around city driving.
- Option two: bigger engine will result in these 300+HP with bigger torque. Sounds nice as far as numbers are concerned. There is one thing called engineer though - which is not often appriciated here. Heavier engine will not help off-road capabilities of this amazing vehicle, and handlig will suffer also. In fact the current V8 is a bit too large and too big in size that Toyota had to do some compromises, rigid front axle as an option as an example. V6 versions of TLC100 do have it available if you need it elsewhere.
Just IMHO -- there is plenty other fine vehicle like X5 with lots of what you need. Why even consider looking at the LX then?
What I want to say actually is if they change the vehicle the way you're suggesting -- I myself would have to be looking elsewhere, which I do not want to do at all
See what happens.....
- Option one: 300+HP with the same engine size will result in less torque, and less then ideal torque curve. Bad for off-road, and bad for all-around city driving.
- Option two: bigger engine will result in these 300+HP with bigger torque. Sounds nice as far as numbers are concerned. There is one thing called engineer though - which is not often appriciated here. Heavier engine will not help off-road capabilities of this amazing vehicle, and handlig will suffer also. In fact the current V8 is a bit too large and too big in size that Toyota had to do some compromises, rigid front axle as an option as an example. V6 versions of TLC100 do have it available if you need it elsewhere.
Just IMHO -- there is plenty other fine vehicle like X5 with lots of what you need. Why even consider looking at the LX then?
What I want to say actually is if they change the vehicle the way you're suggesting -- I myself would have to be looking elsewhere, which I do not want to do at all
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Well I see both views. In this months issue of CAr & Driver ( the mustang on the cover) they test the new Lincoln. Of course they did not like it and they pointed out that while torque is up, the 300hp rating is the same and they basically said for these big vehicles, you NEED 345 and up hp to move these big trucks. I can see that.
Or just slap the TRD supercharger in!
I think the next LX will have a hp increase OR a completely different engine because the GX (which is 15k cheaper) has the same identical engine.
Or just slap the TRD supercharger in!
I think the next LX will have a hp increase OR a completely different engine because the GX (which is 15k cheaper) has the same identical engine.
#38
Lexus Champion
Re: Re: HP again
Originally posted by VQPOWER
Most competent SUV's of today are faster than 9.9. And even if they wern't, the LX is simply average in terms of performance. For 60k, I want more than adequate. The X5 does it in 6.6, the Escalade does it in 7.4, the ML500 in 6.8, and to prove my "V6 point", the new Bravada (w/ 270hp) does it in 7.9. Almost every decent SUV I can think of outpowers and outperfroms (in performance) the LX. Even dismal Isuzu matches the LX in horsepower. Ford's SUV's beat it, even the sloppy Expedition(9.6) BTW, the V8 Explorer does it in 8 flat. The last three I mentioned don't even compare to the LX, but they perform better, which is all I was trying to say. For the money Lexus wants for it, they need to get HP competitive. Throw in a 300+HP motor and it would be on my list.
Most competent SUV's of today are faster than 9.9. And even if they wern't, the LX is simply average in terms of performance. For 60k, I want more than adequate. The X5 does it in 6.6, the Escalade does it in 7.4, the ML500 in 6.8, and to prove my "V6 point", the new Bravada (w/ 270hp) does it in 7.9. Almost every decent SUV I can think of outpowers and outperfroms (in performance) the LX. Even dismal Isuzu matches the LX in horsepower. Ford's SUV's beat it, even the sloppy Expedition(9.6) BTW, the V8 Explorer does it in 8 flat. The last three I mentioned don't even compare to the LX, but they perform better, which is all I was trying to say. For the money Lexus wants for it, they need to get HP competitive. Throw in a 300+HP motor and it would be on my list.
My personal experience, yes it has enough power. Would it be nicer if it had more power, handled better AND retained all those things that make it what it is... Darn right it would! If I want to drive fast and furious I drive the GS, and even that would be nicer if it had more power and handled better... Now that's another story!
#40
Lexus Champion
Originally posted by Toog4me
The original ??? was that this guy wanted an SUV that had luxury, speed, and space... i guess the LX isnt one of his choices.
The original ??? was that this guy wanted an SUV that had luxury, speed, and space... i guess the LX isnt one of his choices.
Last edited by redgs4; 05-15-02 at 10:00 PM.
#41
Driver
Thread Starter
Well, I end up compromising and I got an Acura MDX. Does not have the LX's luxury but it has more power and plenty of space.
I am waiting for the GX or LX next generation, since I do like the Lexus better.
Thank you for all your comments.
I am waiting for the GX or LX next generation, since I do like the Lexus better.
Thank you for all your comments.
#44
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you guys are mean... lol... i like the MDX, it has some power, good for cruizin, but not a lot of space for your furniture... but its really comfy and good nav system...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LexFather
Car Chat
41
12-25-08 08:15 AM
stoumtj
GX - 1st Gen (2003-2009)
1
11-20-04 04:26 PM