Differnces between LX470 and LandCruiser?
#1
Differnces between LX470 and LandCruiser?
What are they? My dad plans to buy a LandCruiser for my Mum. Overhere in germany the Lexus is not available so I would like to know the differences. I believe the Diesel engine is not available in the US? It is a 4.2l with 204HP. You can also get the 4.7 over here but gas is too expensive for a car like that over here.
Thanks
Thanks
#3
This depends on the market you are in
In US and Canada LandCruiser Cygnus is called Lexus LX470. In Germany as far as I can remember Cygnus is not sold, only LandCruiser 100 (the one that in US is known as 'LandCruiser'). But in Germany you can get LandCruiser 100 50th Anniversary, which is the same vehicle as the Cygnus with the exception of the front/rear lights and the grill. You get the same interior, hydro-pneumatic suspension, navigation etc (and actually better leather then on the LX).
The other option is the import LX from say Canada, where it's optics is set to the same standards as in Europe. And temperature, speed and distance readings are that same as in Europe.
The only thing I am not sure of is what are you gonna be using this vehicle for in Germany. It askes for the real off-road. And it's needs a lot of fuel to do the autobahns.
The other option is the import LX from say Canada, where it's optics is set to the same standards as in Europe. And temperature, speed and distance readings are that same as in Europe.
The only thing I am not sure of is what are you gonna be using this vehicle for in Germany. It askes for the real off-road. And it's needs a lot of fuel to do the autobahns.
#4
in the US, the difference in price is not even that big when you do your proper math...
according to carsdirect.com, 2002 model, initially the price difference is $8,536 ($57,061 vs $48,525 not including taxes)
but take the land cruiser and add options that are standard on the lx470; add roof racks, running boards, navigation, side airbags, wood dash, tow, and floor mats, and the difference now becomes $4,193
but the lx470 offers way more for the $4,193...
1)wood steering wheel (quoted $2000 at dealership... wtf?! )
2)wood and chrome transmission shifter ($200 at dealership)
3)power folding side mirrors with auto tilt down(not sure if this is available on L/C's)
4)AVS suspension with height control
5)6 disc cd changer (even on models without the mark levinson upgrade)
6)auto climate control (again... correct me if the L/C's have this)
7)memory seats (last one i'm unsure of)
8)lexus customer service
9)the piece of mind that you own a lexus instead of a toyota (granted they are the same company, one is established as a luxury car maker as opposed to a versatile car maker)
plus the leather in the lexus is more supple, and the wood trim more better and more abundant.
plus if you buy these used as i have, the price difference is so small, since the L/C is a 4x4 legend and hold residual value extremely well
according to carsdirect.com, 2002 model, initially the price difference is $8,536 ($57,061 vs $48,525 not including taxes)
but take the land cruiser and add options that are standard on the lx470; add roof racks, running boards, navigation, side airbags, wood dash, tow, and floor mats, and the difference now becomes $4,193
but the lx470 offers way more for the $4,193...
1)wood steering wheel (quoted $2000 at dealership... wtf?! )
2)wood and chrome transmission shifter ($200 at dealership)
3)power folding side mirrors with auto tilt down(not sure if this is available on L/C's)
4)AVS suspension with height control
5)6 disc cd changer (even on models without the mark levinson upgrade)
6)auto climate control (again... correct me if the L/C's have this)
7)memory seats (last one i'm unsure of)
8)lexus customer service
9)the piece of mind that you own a lexus instead of a toyota (granted they are the same company, one is established as a luxury car maker as opposed to a versatile car maker)
plus the leather in the lexus is more supple, and the wood trim more better and more abundant.
plus if you buy these used as i have, the price difference is so small, since the L/C is a 4x4 legend and hold residual value extremely well
#5
Really like the Landcruiser but...
Originally posted by Garbage Gamer
according to carsdirect.com, 2002 model, initially the price [Landcruiser] ($48,525 not including taxes)
according to carsdirect.com, 2002 model, initially the price [Landcruiser] ($48,525 not including taxes)
#6
Re: Really like the Landcruiser but...
Originally posted by JAC JZS
Wow for the price of an '02 Landcruiser($48,525+tax) you could buy an '02 GS430($45,409+tax[base vs. base]) :eek: :eek: :eek: No wonder why Toyota's dropping the Landcruiser:eek: JK
Wow for the price of an '02 Landcruiser($48,525+tax) you could buy an '02 GS430($45,409+tax[base vs. base]) :eek: :eek: :eek: No wonder why Toyota's dropping the Landcruiser:eek: JK
#7
Re: Re: Really like the Landcruiser but...
Originally posted by LX470Mann
THE LANDCRUISER IS NOT GOING TO BE DISCONTINUED!!! UNLESS YOU HAVE PROOF FROM AN EXEC. AT TOYOTA, AND NOT SOME MECHANIC. I read motor-trend/car and driver and they have never mentioned any plans to discontinue the legendary landcruiser. I still see many LC driving around. A popular vehicle. The weird thing is some pre-owned landcruisers are selling for more than pre-owned LX's of the same year and mileage. I never understood that one?
THE LANDCRUISER IS NOT GOING TO BE DISCONTINUED!!! UNLESS YOU HAVE PROOF FROM AN EXEC. AT TOYOTA, AND NOT SOME MECHANIC. I read motor-trend/car and driver and they have never mentioned any plans to discontinue the legendary landcruiser. I still see many LC driving around. A popular vehicle. The weird thing is some pre-owned landcruisers are selling for more than pre-owned LX's of the same year and mileage. I never understood that one?
Trending Topics
#8
"For those serious off-road enthusiasts, the LX470 may get laughed at on the trail"
Usually it does not last long When a coulpe of stock TJs or GrandCherokees are stopped at by a ditch or a sand bank they can't make through and you give them a good tug on the LX they normally become much more sober.
Alex
PS I do go off-road quite a bit.
Alex
PS I do go off-road quite a bit.
#9
Hey all,
First off, TLC does NOT have locking rear diff anymore! That option was last seen in 1999 model i think. TLC and LX470 now have A-TRAC (active 4-wheel traction control with locking center differential), along with VSC (stability control).
In fact, you can say that the LX470 is MORE capable than TLC because of one reason...Electronic height control. This feature (not available on TLC) increases approach and departure angles (not ground clearance). In addition, because the BODY is raised up (frame is same height), you are less susceptible to body damage.
Other than that, the TLC and LX470 are plenty capable...in fact, i would take the '03 LX470 over the new Range Rover anyday! The new 5-speed has a really LOW 1st gear (3.57 i think), which is pretty darn cool! If you add to that a 4.1 gear ratio and 2.49:1 transfer case, you have a pretty good crawl ratio!!
Of course, i am not too excited about the 18" rims...i think 17" is already stretching it.
Thanks.
First off, TLC does NOT have locking rear diff anymore! That option was last seen in 1999 model i think. TLC and LX470 now have A-TRAC (active 4-wheel traction control with locking center differential), along with VSC (stability control).
In fact, you can say that the LX470 is MORE capable than TLC because of one reason...Electronic height control. This feature (not available on TLC) increases approach and departure angles (not ground clearance). In addition, because the BODY is raised up (frame is same height), you are less susceptible to body damage.
Other than that, the TLC and LX470 are plenty capable...in fact, i would take the '03 LX470 over the new Range Rover anyday! The new 5-speed has a really LOW 1st gear (3.57 i think), which is pretty darn cool! If you add to that a 4.1 gear ratio and 2.49:1 transfer case, you have a pretty good crawl ratio!!
Of course, i am not too excited about the 18" rims...i think 17" is already stretching it.
Thanks.
#10
"First off, TLC does NOT have locking rear diff anymore! That option was last seen in 1999 model i think. TLC and LX470 now have A-TRAC (active 4-wheel traction control with locking center differential), along with VSC (stability control)."
Sorry to doubt, but I had to look it up at Toyota.com to make sure you were right and well, you are quite right about the locking center differential.
Sorry to doubt, but I had to look it up at Toyota.com to make sure you were right and well, you are quite right about the locking center differential.
#11
Re: Really like the Landcruiser but...
Originally posted by tigmd99
First off, TLC does NOT have locking rear diff anymore! That option was last seen in 1999 model i think.
First off, TLC does NOT have locking rear diff anymore! That option was last seen in 1999 model i think.
i suppose one can argue the added torque from the new V8 is a trail advantage, but the old flat 6 (not too sure) was sufficient enough, and it was time proven. that engine just keeps running strong.
In fact, you can say that the LX470 is MORE capable than TLC because of one reason...Electronic height control. This feature (not available on TLC) increases approach and departure angles (not ground clearance). In addition, because the BODY is raised up (frame is same height), you are less susceptible to body damage.
LX470 height = 72.8 inches
LX470 height at raised position = 73.2 inches
L/C height = 73.2 inches
There is no advantages the LX470 have over the L/C when you are talking about off road capabilities. they are the same vehicle. one is just more adapt for comfort and convenience.
i could be wrong though
...in fact, i would take the '03 LX470 over the new Range Rover anyday!
a british luxury truck, and one with quite a price tag.
it also comes from a company that only makes 4x4's with real off road capability.
too bad it breaks down very often (even it's new owner bmw is not too reputable). not as reliable as a toyota. and when you do take it to a shop, you have to pay for high $ labor and expensive british/german imported parts.
Originally posted by JAC JZS
Wow for the price of an '02 Landcruiser($48,525+tax) you could buy an '02 GS430($45,409+tax[base vs. base])... No wonder why Toyota's dropping the Landcruiser
Wow for the price of an '02 Landcruiser($48,525+tax) you could buy an '02 GS430($45,409+tax[base vs. base])... No wonder why Toyota's dropping the Landcruiser
if they drop the L/C, at least one of it's forms will still be on the market (L/C / LX470). internationally i know some live by the L/C for their reputation as reliable off road trucks.
besides, not much to compete with in this category.
Land cruisers, G-Wagons, Hummers, and Range Rovers being the truly off-road capable SUV's in a stock form.
but i have to admit, after owning an LX470 for 4 months, i'd rather own a luxury sedan now.
i used to own a jeep and i would do almost everything with that truck. take shortcuts by running over all types of curbs and objects, run into private and public gardens and parks to run over rocks and boulders, take it through muddy waters where the depth submerged part of the engine and got my interior messed up, and in times where i needed a locker i would use speed and aggression to get my truck through obstacles.
now that i own a LX470, i find myself even slowing down for speed bumps (which i used to run over at 35mph in my jeep).
i don't want to abuse nothing in the truck, even though i know it has a heavy duty suspension. i would even be reluctant to tow with it. i just don't have use for the 4x4 functions of the truck, i use it as more of as a car to just take me from paved road to paved road, just now arriving in style.
now that i find myself so concerned with my luxury trucks condition, i learned that a sedan will suit me so much better. when i drive the truck, i drive just to drive. i don't feel inspired by the road. i don't get the thrill to push my ride harder. not so in a powerful luxury car.
i might save some $$ and wait till the ls430's are like 3-4 years old with 60-80k mileage, then i might trade my lx470 for one.
Last edited by Garbage Gamer; 09-24-02 at 05:07 AM.
#12
Garbage Gamer,
Please compare the more essential stats: breakover and departure angles between LX and TLC, rather than height.
Nope, before VSC/ATRAC, the '98-'00 TLC had an optional rear locking differential! Then when VSC/ATRAC came on board, the rear locker is no longer needed, thus went out the window. Only the Toyota Tacoma now have this option.
Unfortunately for Land Rover, all across the world, Toyota is the premier off-roading vehicles. The new Afgan president rides in a LX470! United Nations uses 4Runners. Africa safaries use Land Cruisers. Land Rover factories are now Toyota factories! Many people on those places much prefer Toyota vehicles due to very hostile environment (hot weather, rough terrains, etc.). Land Rovers break down too often to survive.
Of course, i like the LX due to it's reliability and toughness. The new Range Rover is UNproven itself. Why would i buy a British/Ford product?? Both are known for bad quality. BMW was the previous owner...and well, they are not known for their lasting qualities.
I will say this: there is no way (in heaven or hell) that an independent suspension can match a solid axle wheel articulation in off-roading!! Even with Range Rover's new cross-linking shocks. Just compare the wheel articulation on pictures of both vehicles and you will see!
Thanks.
Please compare the more essential stats: breakover and departure angles between LX and TLC, rather than height.
Nope, before VSC/ATRAC, the '98-'00 TLC had an optional rear locking differential! Then when VSC/ATRAC came on board, the rear locker is no longer needed, thus went out the window. Only the Toyota Tacoma now have this option.
Unfortunately for Land Rover, all across the world, Toyota is the premier off-roading vehicles. The new Afgan president rides in a LX470! United Nations uses 4Runners. Africa safaries use Land Cruisers. Land Rover factories are now Toyota factories! Many people on those places much prefer Toyota vehicles due to very hostile environment (hot weather, rough terrains, etc.). Land Rovers break down too often to survive.
Of course, i like the LX due to it's reliability and toughness. The new Range Rover is UNproven itself. Why would i buy a British/Ford product?? Both are known for bad quality. BMW was the previous owner...and well, they are not known for their lasting qualities.
I will say this: there is no way (in heaven or hell) that an independent suspension can match a solid axle wheel articulation in off-roading!! Even with Range Rover's new cross-linking shocks. Just compare the wheel articulation on pictures of both vehicles and you will see!
Thanks.
Last edited by tigmd99; 08-16-05 at 06:07 AM.
#13
"nothing is more of an SUV status symbol than a range rover."
Sorry I come from Europe myself... and LandRover is just a not very good British vehicle known for not being very good off-road and very reliable, rather poorly designed. That 'status' thing is in the heads of some people (not many) and mostly on this continent and in the UK. Just wanted to let you know that if you want that 'status' - not a lot of people will look at you exactly this way, so so you can really realy go wrong Let's stick to the matirial and quatifiable things, I'd suggest.
And one more thing -- if you drive your LX as a luxury sedan - you are better off with a luxury sedan indeed. Don't think you should blame LX for this.
And one more thing -- if you drive your LX as a luxury sedan - you are better off with a luxury sedan indeed. Don't think you should blame LX for this.
#14
Re: Re: Really like the Landcruiser but...
Originally posted by Garbage Gamer
i might save some $$ and wait till the ls430's are like 3-4 years old with 60-80k mileage, then i might trade my lx470 for one.
i might save some $$ and wait till the ls430's are like 3-4 years old with 60-80k mileage, then i might trade my lx470 for one.