LX - 3rd Gen (2008-2021) Posts related to the LX570 belong in this forum

Official Unofficial 3LX 570 thread (as in upcoming 3rd gen)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-07 | 08:10 AM
  #136  
syswei's Avatar
syswei
Pole Position
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by pagemaster
I am not sure why people complain about the gas on this truck when the vehicle is very high priced to begin with.
Because the lifetime cost can be significant if one keeps the vehicle awhile and drives alot. My LX is over 7 years old now. I expect our next SUV to be driven about 192,000 miles over its lifetime if we keep it 8 years.

EPA puts combined LX mpg at 15, but as everyone knows, EPA numbers are generally overstated (which is why the methodology will be revised next year), so to be more accurate I'll apply a 15% discount, yielding 12.75 (which I think is typical of what we've actually been getting). But the 2008 LX is known to be larger (at least lengthwise) and uses a 5.7-liter engine. On the other hand, it is a more modern engine, so let's cut the 12.75 only modestly, to 12.0.

Premium as of yesterday was $2.90 in my area (Greenwich, CT), but I happen to believe in Hubbert's "peak oil" theory, and think that over the 8-year presumed life of my next SUV, premium will average at least 4.00.

192k miles at $4.00 and 12.0 mpg = $64,000 of gas

Compare that to say a 2007 MDX, EPA 19 mpg combined * .85 = 16.15

192k miles at $4.00 and 16.15 mpg = $47,554

difference = $16,445

The current base LX is $67,400. The 2007 MDX (with sport/tech/ent) $47,800.

To me, the LX is worth at least $20,000 more, based on roominess, luxury, quality/reliability, and prestige.

But when I factor in our expected lifetime driving, the real difference is $36,000. Is it worth THAT much more to me?
Old 01-21-07 | 09:07 AM
  #137  
Max707's Avatar
Max707
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 42
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by syswei
Because the lifetime cost can be significant if one keeps the vehicle awhile and drives alot. My LX is over 7 years old now. I expect our next SUV to be driven about 192,000 miles over its lifetime if we keep it 8 years.

EPA puts combined LX mpg at 15, but as everyone knows, EPA numbers are generally overstated (which is why the methodology will be revised next year), so to be more accurate I'll apply a 15% discount, yielding 12.75 (which I think is typical of what we've actually been getting). But the 2008 LX is known to be larger (at least lengthwise) and uses a 5.7-liter engine. On the other hand, it is a more modern engine, so let's cut the 12.75 only modestly, to 12.0.

Premium as of yesterday was $2.90 in my area (Greenwich, CT), but I happen to believe in Hubbert's "peak oil" theory, and think that over the 8-year presumed life of my next SUV, premium will average at least 4.00.

192k miles at $4.00 and 12.0 mpg = $64,000 of gas

Compare that to say a 2007 MDX, EPA 19 mpg combined * .85 = 16.15

192k miles at $4.00 and 16.15 mpg = $47,554

difference = $16,445

The current base LX is $67,400. The 2007 MDX (with sport/tech/ent) $47,800.

To me, the LX is worth at least $20,000 more, based on roominess, luxury, quality/reliability, and prestige.

But when I factor in our expected lifetime driving, the real difference is $36,000. Is it worth THAT much more to me?

You are way out there with your numbers. Lets use 15K miles a year and compare the 15 mpg LX with a 20 mpg econ SUV at an inflated $3.00 per gallon average. It's $1.97 per gallon today here in Missouri. You end up spending $3750 more over 5 years and 75K miles driving the LX. That's $60 per month or $2 per day. Like I've said before I can save that by changing my meal tipping habit's from 20% to 15% Now I am safer driving around in my 5600lb LX and I am more comfortable and I have more luxury. If you want to look at saving energy, have the tree hugging hollywood types move out of their 10,000 sq ft houses that cost $$$ and energy to heat and cool while the same tree huggers drive one of though electric cars trying to make a statement.
Old 01-21-07 | 09:19 AM
  #138  
_JP_'s Avatar
_JP_
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

4500/yr premium to drive an LX v. an MDX based on your statistical formula.

if a v6 unit body construction vehicle will fit the bill for your needs, then all you have to decide is whether or not you WANT an LX. you will have to pay a luxury premium for features you will not use if decide to go that route.

if you decide that the v6 unit body construction vehicle will fit all of your needs you could likely find a similar vehicle that would save you another 4500/yr......

another thing to factor into your analysis (assuming you have more than one vehicle) is the cost of all of these things spread over several machines. we opted for the lux SUV/prius combo. gas mileage is certainly a large issue both from a financial perspective and an environmental one. many more miles will be put on our prius than the LX as the prius is the commuter car. so at 47.5mpg for 65% of our household miles and 15mpg from the LX for the other 35%. i use these numbers as they are what i have personally observed regardless of EPA. weighted average is around 36mpg. much better than when we were a 2 sedan family with one 4cyl @ 28mpg max and one V6 at 21mpg ish.

do some math. come to your own conclusions. i still think its a bit of a stretch to be complaining about gas prices when considering a vehicle with an MSRP of $70,000 when there are perfectly adequate alternatives for around half of that price.

jp
Old 01-21-07 | 09:31 AM
  #139  
_JP_'s Avatar
_JP_
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

max707.

on the whole hollywood types thing, spot on. CA carpool lane sticker has made more environmentalists in one year than the sierra club in this state has in the past 20. as long as the air doesn't choke them too much and they can still drink the tap water and swim in the lake/ocean without getting too sick, americans as a whole don't give a damn about the environment.

get me my starbucks frappacino, damnit, american idol's about to start.

jp

BACK ON TOPIC:
LX570 pics in trucktrend? looked on their site and couldn't find anything. link? or is just in the mag? thx.
Old 01-21-07 | 09:35 AM
  #140  
1loudLX's Avatar
1loudLX
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,732
Likes: 1
From: now here
Default

there is no alternative to a LX470...aside from a Land Cruiser.


You guys with your numbers actually dont make me feel so bad. I get about 10mpg compared to your 12-15. i thought people we getting around 17. I hope to see the new ones get the same gas mileage if they are going to give me over 100 more HP.
Old 01-21-07 | 09:38 AM
  #141  
Max707's Avatar
Max707
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 42
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by _JP_
max707.

on the whole hollywood types thing, spot on. CA carpool lane sticker has made more environmentalists in one year than the sierra club in this state has in the past 20. as long as the air doesn't choke them too much and they can still drink the tap water and swim in the lake/ocean without getting too sick, americans as a whole don't give a damn about the environment.

get me my starbucks frappacino, damnit, american idol's about to start.

jp

BACK ON TOPIC:
LX570 pics in trucktrend? looked on their site and couldn't find anything. link? or is just in the mag? thx.
Totally agree. I just get a kick out of the Hollywood types with their 3 homes, pools, and then environmental elite attitude
Old 01-21-07 | 11:41 AM
  #142  
okcfunky's Avatar
okcfunky
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: TX/OK
Default

One thing to keep in mind is that going to a 5.7, modernized, with a 6 speed lock-up, you'll probably end up getting better mileage. Heck my 8.1L 7000lb. truck gets equal mileage to the 00 LX I had. I average 8mpg @85 w/6000Lbs in tow and 13 unloaded. Gas prices are rather friendly around my area, 1.87 for 87 in Oklahoma last week when I filled up. When I saw the Toyota specs for the 5.7, you don't have to run premium, 87 is fine.

The more the engine has to work, the more gas you burn. Whereas the smaller engines have to rev up more, the larger ones have it easier. I can only compare off of 6.0L and 8.1L GM trucks. As they start getting the pounds added on, the larger engines return better mileage from what I've seen.



I wonder how much energy is wasted by studios et. al.
Old 02-01-07 | 09:04 AM
  #143  
superinfin's Avatar
superinfin
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: --
Default

Hey All,

((I don't know if these photos were posted here before ))

These are some photos of the so called 2008 Toyota Land cruiser and Lexus LX ...

I'm not sure about the credibility of those so...


what do you think ?? and do you have more info ??



btw the front of the car looks the same of the spied one posted before ...


















Old 02-01-07 | 09:47 AM
  #144  
jdmlx470's Avatar
jdmlx470
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: OK
Default

hope not..that thing looks like a wide version of the GX.

_mikey
Old 02-01-07 | 10:04 AM
  #145  
1uzfelbc's Avatar
1uzfelbc
Rookie
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by AJL0365
to anyone who likes the QX please stay away from it, i work at an infiniti dealership and the QX is nothing but crap. rattles all over the place, electrical problems, headlamps have condensation in them when t hey come off the truck, the paint is horrible on everyone, but the blue is hot though, the QX is really not worth the trouble in considering, i would stay away from anything that comes from the canton plant really.

just from looks alone it looks exactly like and Armada. if your thinking QX just say yourself a whole lot of money and get the nissan instead
Old 02-01-07 | 11:26 AM
  #146  
Trexus's Avatar
Trexus
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 54
From: California
Default

I got to thinking and maybe Lexus might keep the LX as an LX 470 and introduce a new SUV based on the Toyota Sequoia as the new JX 570. Lexus SUV line up might look like this:

RX 350
GX 470
LX 470
JX 570

Just a thought...
Old 02-01-07 | 03:49 PM
  #147  
jjbodean's Avatar
jjbodean
Lexus Test Driver
CL Folding 25,000
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: WV
Default

Originally Posted by Trexus
I got to thinking and maybe Lexus might keep the LX as an LX 470 and introduce a new SUV based on the Toyota Sequoia as the new JX 570. Lexus SUV line up might look like this:

RX 350
GX 470
LX 470
JX 570

Just a thought...
um, no
Old 02-01-07 | 08:28 PM
  #148  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its going to look more swoopy than that, while maintaining its "tough" image. Understand the amenities will be on par with the LS 460.

Expect a hybrid to come!
Old 02-01-07 | 10:42 PM
  #149  
valgs350's Avatar
valgs350
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

My LX470 looks way better than the PIX above!

I do hope Lexus keeps the quad headlights, one of my favorite things about the car are the quad headlights!
Old 02-01-07 | 10:46 PM
  #150  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by VAL678
My LX470 looks way better than the PIX above!

I do hope Lexus keeps the quad headlights, one of my favorite things about the car are the quad headlights!
There might be a chance the LX and GX swap headlights. Thus the LX and LS will share the same similar headlight design and the GS and GX will share the quad lamps.....


Quick Reply: Official Unofficial 3LX 570 thread (as in upcoming 3rd gen)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:48 PM.