LX - 3rd Gen (2008-2021) Posts related to the LX570 belong in this forum

Premium fuel really needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-25-17, 11:20 AM
  #136  
Max707
Lexus Champion
 
Max707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,728
Received 42 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by I6turbo
If you want to know more about knock suppression methods you can read Section 5 of the article that you linked.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...60128516300764
Looks like you did not understand the article after reading it. "Knock" "ping" is a bad thing and can over time damage and degrade your engines dependablity and long term viability. That is why manufactures have the ability to temporarily adjust for low quality fuel. Hence Lexus states Premium fuel "REQUIRED". if I am wrong about engine knock being a bad thing for my Lexus and why you and others on this site think that you know more then the engineers that developed this engine for the LX570 please site published information from Lexus that states they were wrong in requiring the "REQUIRED" use of premium gas.
Old 12-25-17, 11:38 AM
  #137  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,990
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by REDHORSE
Until someone can show me a study done on a dyno, with controlled parameters I'll go by what the manufacturer recommends in their owners manual. I see no reason a manufacturer could benefit from telling buyers to spend more money on gasoline that is required.

Show me the dyno results, then I'll believe there is no difference.
Originally Posted by Max707
Looks like you did not understand the article after reading it. "Knock" "ping" is a bad thing and can over time damage and degrade your engines dependablity and long term viability. That is why manufactures have the ability to temporarily adjust for low quality fuel. Hence Lexus states Premium fuel "REQUIRED". if I am wrong about engine knock being a bad thing for my Lexus and why you and others on this site think that you know more then the engineers that developed this engine for the LX570 please site published information from Lexus that states they were wrong in requiring the "REQUIRED" use of premium gas.
You can also have knock without hearing it. There are different grades of knock. Knock sensors wear out as well.
Old 12-25-17, 12:51 PM
  #138  
Htony
Lexus Champion
 
Htony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: AB
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 134 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
You can also have knock without hearing it. There are different grades of knock. Knock sensors wear out as well.
Knock sensors can detect knock occurring beyond our hearing range. They are Piezo transducer(in other word; microphone) If any one who says car engine behaves same regardless of fuel grade, (s)he is just a green vehicle operator. I can even tell the difference between same grade fuel from different brand. I stick to Shell premium and always try to fill up at busy gas station for fresh fuel. If I do the same with Esso premium it feels different as well as smells different at the tail pipe. I am a driver, not an operator. Which one are you? Today's engines are mostly GDI type which make it important using top tier gas, oil. and proper PCV function to keep the engine running at peak performance level. Driving a vehicle is business of using all 5 senses always.
Old 12-25-17, 01:04 PM
  #139  
Htony
Lexus Champion
 
Htony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: AB
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 134 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by I6turbo
Regarding the original question, I've checked the fuel mileage (the old-fashioned way, miles divided by gallons consumed) on perhaps 50-60 tank-fulls of premium vs. regular in my GX 470 and LX 570. With my vehicles and my driving styles, there is NO difference in fuel mileage (and none should be expected, IMO). I also don't notice any difference in the way either vehicle runs or performs on regular vs. premium. I've burned only regular (Top Tier brands) in the GX for the past 70K miles and in the LX for the past 24K, and both engines run as well as they ever did. IMO, the use of premium fuel for MOST people/vehicles is much like the 3,000 mile oil change; largely a marketing shenanigan.
Did you take basic thermo dynamics in school? subject here is about engine performing at optimum level per design specs. using designated fuel grade. If owner's manual states fuel requirement, just follow it. If you ever towed with your truck you'll understand about this more readily. I used to tow 7500 lbs. fifth wheel driving at sea level up to high altitudes in the Rockies. I live in Foothills region. Experience is a good teacher....
How about taking the heads off your engines, take a look, see. Again experience is a good teacher.
Old 12-25-17, 01:13 PM
  #140  
Htony
Lexus Champion
 
Htony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: AB
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 134 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Airbusdriv
I have a 2017 Tundra with the exact same engine as my Lexus LX570. Tundra doesn’t require premium grade, why would LX?
Physically same engine, tuning parameters are not same. IMO, that is the reason.. For an example 2 Liter turbo engine VW uses, depending which vehicle it is going in, it can be tuned to produce ~250 Hp or ~200 Hp. Other manufacturers do the same thing. I'd think LX570 is classified as semi truck vs. Tundra is real truck made to deal with heavy work load. I bet their tranny. gear ratio are spec'd different too.
Old 12-25-17, 02:50 PM
  #141  
ClaytonW
Advanced
 
ClaytonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NV
Posts: 528
Received 99 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

At least LC and LX use the same engine (identical parts) and I am almost sure that there is no difference how the engines are tuned. It's just a stupid marketing. Premium car - premium fuel (like in other premium cars where the high octane fuel is really needed). Lexus or Toyta will not give you a specific answer if you ask them (I tried it). I think that they worry a class action lawsuit from LX owners if they admit that these engines are the same and there is no reason for the premium fuel.
Old 12-25-17, 03:32 PM
  #142  
Htony
Lexus Champion
 
Htony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: AB
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 134 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ClaytonW
At least LC and LX use the same engine (identical parts) and I am almost sure that there is no difference how the engines are tuned. It's just a stupid marketing. Premium car - premium fuel (like in other premium cars where the high octane fuel is really needed). Lexus or Toyta will not give you a specific answer if you ask them (I tried it). I think that they worry a class action lawsuit from LX owners if they admit that these engines are the same and there is no reason for the premium fuel.
In olden days brochure used to show detailed engine specs. Now all they show is Hp and Torque ratings. We can't readily see piston stroke, cylinder bore, cam shaft profile, power band, stuff like that. Any how every vehicle in my family uses premium gas per owner's manual. Only son-in-law drives 2017 4 Runner which uses regular gas. I guess if we get service manual, we can see what we want to see in there. Nowadays some owner's manual, service manuals are made into CD format.

Last edited by Htony; 12-25-17 at 05:06 PM.
Old 12-25-17, 04:21 PM
  #143  
Max707
Lexus Champion
 
Max707's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,728
Received 42 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ClaytonW
At least LC and LX use the same engine (identical parts) and I am almost sure that there is no difference how the engines are tuned. It's just a stupid marketing. Premium car - premium fuel (like in other premium cars where the high octane fuel is really needed). Lexus or Toyta will not give you a specific answer if you ask them (I tried it). I think that they worry a class action lawsuit from LX owners if they admit that these engines are the same and there is no reason for the premium fuel.
I would agree if it stated "recommend" but it states required.
Old 12-25-17, 05:18 PM
  #144  
I6turbo
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
I6turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Htony
Did you take basic thermo dynamics in school? subject here is about engine performing at optimum level per design specs.
You may have misread the subject. The subject is "Premium fuel really needed?" Whether or not there's an actual need for 91 Octane or higher.
If owner's manual states fuel requirement, just follow it.
I've owned about 40 vehicles in my life from simple, old-school hot rods to modern performance cars to 18 wheelers, and just about everything else. I do all my own work, never taken one to a shop except for a few free things like warranty work, and a hand-full of alignments. I'll follow the manual if I think I should, not because someone on the internet recommends that I do what they do. Since about 2003 I've been running my Supra on the stock short block (ported head, aftermarket camshafts, fuel system, and other modifications) in a state of tune that makes more than 850 HP from 3 liters. For THAT engine, I run at least 110 Motor octane, and often higher. No premium in the LX or GX, though.

Here's something further on the subject of why manufacturers recommend higher octane (but I won't go into detail, it being Christmas night, me having things I want to do instead....)
A modern engine of good design, in good condition, that's been burning good quality fuel, actually requires several octane points LOWER than the manufacturer states in the "manual." The REASON for this "discrepancy" between what the manual says and what the engine actually needs is that manufacturers specify the octane requirement for a new vehicle based upon what the condition of the combustion chambers might be after the vehicle accumulates several tens of thousands of miles with less-than-ideal quality fuel. Or what it might need after the engine is older and perhaps has started burning some oil (which will very likely lead to deposits)

The primary determiner of octane demand ends up being the temperature that the air/fuel charge reaches before it is ignited by the spark (I won't go into why, but it is). In a clean engine ( that is, "clean" combustion chambers), the temperature that the air/fuel mixture reaches will be relatively low because a lot of the residual heat from the previous combustion event is dissipated through the valves, piston top, and the rest of the cylinder head surface inside the combustion chamber. In this clean engine, when the new charge of air/fuel mixture comes into the cylinder, it doesn't soak up too much heat from the combustion chamber surfaces because they've "cooled" down a good bit. HOWEVER, in engines that burn oil, or that have burned a lot of fuel that is prone to leave carbon deposits, there will be an insulating layer of deposits on these heat-sink surfaces. This layer retains much more heat than does bare metal. Consequently, the fresh air/fuel mixture gets heated several degrees more than it would in an engine with little or no deposits inside the combustion chamber. The result is that the fuel needs a significantly higher anti-knock index, a.k.a., higher octane in these old/deposit-laden engines.

Manufacturers cannot afford to develop a reputation of their engines pinging/knocking/crapping out when they reach 100K miles (or whatever) simply because they've been burning poor quality fuel or for some other reason have developed some deposits inside the combustion chambers. If they did, the resale value of their vehicles would be in the toilet. Therefore, they rate the octane "requirement" high enough that even an older engine in not-so-great condition will be okay with it.

The then-R&D manager for the company that developed Techron back in the day is an acquaintance of mine. He is mostly retired now, but is one of the worlds foremost authorities on fuel additives, including octane boosters. He gave me my my understanding of the OEM octane "requirements" thing. Now you know (unless you choose not to believe.)

If you ever towed with your truck you'll understand about this more readily. I used to tow 7500 lbs. fifth wheel driving at sea level up to high altitudes in the Rockies. I live in Foothills region. Experience is a good teacher....
I've towed plenty - 5th-wheel trailers with earth-moving equipment (very heavy) and livestock trailers (only about 13K pounds). I've built engines specifically for some of those pulling trucks. But that's irrelevant here because the subject is whether or not premium fuel is needed for a 200 series LX 570.
How about taking the heads off your engines, take a look, see. Again experience is a good teacher.
No thank you. I've built a bunch of engines so I've had the head(s) off of plenty, but I don't expect to need to take a head off of the LX.
The following users liked this post:
ships10 (01-20-18)
Old 12-25-17, 05:18 PM
  #145  
Dimcguy
Driver School Candidate
 
Dimcguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: RI
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Regular or premium?

Originally Posted by xswl0931
It seems that the LX570 and the LC have the same engine. Similar power and torque ratings that could be differentiated by intake and exhaust differences. Compression ratio is the same. However, the Lexus lists as requiring Premium, while the Toyota lists as needing only Regular. Does anyone know if there is an actual need for Premium?
I noticed a big difference in MPG as I commute two hours a day, and for the few pennies you save on regular, you miss not having to fill a full tank a week on premium.
Old 12-25-17, 05:32 PM
  #146  
ClaytonW
Advanced
 
ClaytonW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: NV
Posts: 528
Received 99 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Maybe, we should ask a different question. Or two questions. The first one is: Are the LC and LX engines parts identical? I think that some people already spent time and figured out that the answer is yes. The part numbers on all the engine parts are the same. There is no difference. The second question is: What about the software and the settings? Even if the software is identical, there can still be differences in its settings. I don't know the answer. But I would bet that there is no difference. But, who knows... I would be very happy if I could get an answer for this question from Toyota.
Old 12-25-17, 05:54 PM
  #147  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,990
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Htony
Physically same engine, tuning parameters are not same. IMO, that is the reason.. For an example 2 Liter turbo engine VW uses, depending which vehicle it is going in, it can be tuned to produce ~250 Hp or ~200 Hp. Other manufacturers do the same thing. I'd think LX570 is classified as semi truck vs. Tundra is real truck made to deal with heavy work load. I bet their tranny. gear ratio are spec'd different too.
Yes. Totally different rear gearing, 4WD is not engaged all the time on Tundra either. Different exhaust as well.
Old 12-25-17, 08:55 PM
  #148  
Htony
Lexus Champion
 
Htony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: AB
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 134 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by I6turbo
You may have misread the subject. The subject is "Premium fuel really needed?" Whether or not there's an actual need for 91 Octane or higher.
I've owned about 40 vehicles in my life from simple, old-school hot rods to modern performance cars to 18 wheelers, and just about everything else. I do all my own work, never taken one to a shop except for a few free things like warranty work, and a hand-full of alignments. I'll follow the manual if I think I should, not because someone on the internet recommends that I do what they do. Since about 2003 I've been running my Supra on the stock short block (ported head, aftermarket camshafts, fuel system, and other modifications) in a state of tune that makes more than 850 HP from 3 liters. For THAT engine, I run at least 110 Motor octane, and often higher. No premium in the LX or GX, though.

Here's something further on the subject of why manufacturers recommend higher octane (but I won't go into detail, it being Christmas night, me having things I want to do instead....)
A modern engine of good design, in good condition, that's been burning good quality fuel, actually requires several octane points LOWER than the manufacturer states in the "manual." The REASON for this "discrepancy" between what the manual says and what the engine actually needs is that manufacturers specify the octane requirement for a new vehicle based upon what the condition of the combustion chambers might be after the vehicle accumulates several tens of thousands of miles with less-than-ideal quality fuel. Or what it might need after the engine is older and perhaps has started burning some oil (which will very likely lead to deposits)

The primary determiner of octane demand ends up being the temperature that the air/fuel charge reaches before it is ignited by the spark (I won't go into why, but it is). In a clean engine ( that is, "clean" combustion chambers), the temperature that the air/fuel mixture reaches will be relatively low because a lot of the residual heat from the previous combustion event is dissipated through the valves, piston top, and the rest of the cylinder head surface inside the combustion chamber. In this clean engine, when the new charge of air/fuel mixture comes into the cylinder, it doesn't soak up too much heat from the combustion chamber surfaces because they've "cooled" down a good bit. HOWEVER, in engines that burn oil, or that have burned a lot of fuel that is prone to leave carbon deposits, there will be an insulating layer of deposits on these heat-sink surfaces. This layer retains much more heat than does bare metal. Consequently, the fresh air/fuel mixture gets heated several degrees more than it would in an engine with little or no deposits inside the combustion chamber. The result is that the fuel needs a significantly higher anti-knock index, a.k.a., higher octane in these old/deposit-laden engines.

Manufacturers cannot afford to develop a reputation of their engines pinging/knocking/crapping out when they reach 100K miles (or whatever) simply because they've been burning poor quality fuel or for some other reason have developed some deposits inside the combustion chambers. If they did, the resale value of their vehicles would be in the toilet. Therefore, they rate the octane "requirement" high enough that even an older engine in not-so-great condition will be okay with it.

The then-R&D manager for the company that developed Techron back in the day is an acquaintance of mine. He is mostly retired now, but is one of the worlds foremost authorities on fuel additives, including octane boosters. He gave me my my understanding of the OEM octane "requirements" thing. Now you know (unless you choose not to believe.)


I've towed plenty - 5th-wheel trailers with earth-moving equipment (very heavy) and livestock trailers (only about 13K pounds). I've built engines specifically for some of those pulling trucks. But that's irrelevant here because the subject is whether or not premium fuel is needed for a 200 series LX 570.
No thank you. I've built a bunch of engines so I've had the head(s) off of plenty, but I don't expect to need to take a head off of the LX.
Yea, but modern engines are new breed engines applying GDI, two stage turbo, variable compression turbo, etc. Like today's vehicles are more electronics related than mechanics. Old shade tree mechanics, grease monkeys there nothing much to work on engines without knowing basic electronics. We are living in the era of digital electronics, AI logic, Nano tech, etc. Maybe we are in same age group. I'll be 78 in the new year.
Back is in EE. Retired almost 20 years ago from one company I worked for since I returned from overseas work frog hopping the globe. We have to move on based on the old knowledge we gained for newer technology. Being old is not an excuse not to learn new things. Again if owner's manual says use premium gas, just use it. I bet guys who designed engines know better than we do. Hyundai built a engine for new Genesis(of course GDI, turbo) they are worrying about reliability issues. That's rumor I heard coming from my home country Korea. I understand engineers are working hard to eliminate bad effect of using GDI
technology. BTW, GDI was invented by Bosch in the 30s. They used GDI engines to prevent fuel starvation problem using carburetors. VS. British woman engineer invented modified carburetor which elimnated
fuel starvation during dog fight. They used it on Spitfires.
The following users liked this post:
Max707 (01-24-18)
Old 12-26-17, 10:17 AM
  #149  
lexusrus
Pole Position
 
lexusrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 0
Received 250 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

So true.

Sometimes when I go fill up our LX570 by myself.......Sometimes I just use the cheapest 87 octane gas. Sure enough, when my wife drives it, she knows and can tell the difference!!!!


Originally Posted by Htony
Knock sensors can detect knock occurring beyond our hearing range. They are Piezo transducer(in other word; microphone) If any one who says car engine behaves same regardless of fuel grade, (s)he is just a green vehicle operator. I can even tell the difference between same grade fuel from different brand. I stick to Shell premium and always try to fill up at busy gas station for fresh fuel. If I do the same with Esso premium it feels different as well as smells different at the tail pipe. I am a driver, not an operator. Which one are you? Today's engines are mostly GDI type which make it important using top tier gas, oil. and proper PCV function to keep the engine running at peak performance level. Driving a vehicle is business of using all 5 senses always.
Old 12-26-17, 11:40 AM
  #150  
I6turbo
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
I6turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Htony
Yea, but modern engines are new breed engines applying GDI, two stage turbo, variable compression turbo, etc. Like today's vehicles are more electronics related than mechanics. Old shade tree mechanics, grease monkeys there nothing much to work on engines without knowing basic electronics. We are living in the era of digital electronics, AI logic, Nano tech, etc. Maybe we are in same age group. I'll be 78 in the new year.
Back is in EE. Retired almost 20 years ago from one company I worked for since I returned from overseas work frog hopping the globe. We have to move on based on the old knowledge we gained for newer technology. Being old is not an excuse not to learn new things. Again if owner's manual says use premium gas, just use it. I bet guys who designed engines know better than we do. Hyundai built a engine for new Genesis(of course GDI, turbo) they are worrying about reliability issues. That's rumor I heard coming from my home country Korea. I understand engineers are working hard to eliminate bad effect of using GDI
technology. BTW, GDI was invented by Bosch in the 30s. They used GDI engines to prevent fuel starvation problem using carburetors. VS. British woman engineer invented modified carburetor which elimnated
fuel starvation during dog fight. They used it on Spitfires.
Nice ramble there, but none of that has anything to do with the actual octane requirement of the engine in the LX, except the fact that the electronics can detect and adjust for the lower octane in the (unlikely) event that the engine encounters a condition where 87 isn't enough to allow 100% of rated output.

Last edited by I6turbo; 12-27-17 at 05:15 PM.
The following users liked this post:
ships10 (01-20-18)


Quick Reply: Premium fuel really needed?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:19 AM.