NX - 1st Gen (2015-2021)

Cars from the 1980s you might think are faster than the NX (but aren't)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-15, 09:25 PM
  #1  
dunebuggy
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
dunebuggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: NSW
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Smile Cars from the 1980s you might think are faster than the NX (but aren't)

I've only been on the Lexus forum for a little while. But I'm frankly so excited to be joining the Lexus family, I thought I'd indulge in this just for fun

Something we tend to forget is just how far car performance has come over the years. Modern SUVs/Crossovers now have performance far superior to cars of decades past. But even in terms of pure acceleration, a modern crossover will outpace a lot of classics.

If you know cars well, you won't be surprised by the following.
But if you still find "sporty appearance" alluring, you may be.

Using a little pocketbook calls "Cars" (published in 1987) that I owned as a boy, and which is filled with spec sheets of many sports cars available in 1987, here are a few cars the NX 200t F-Sport will match or surpass for speed alone...

2015 Lexus NX 200t F-Sport
0-60mph = 6.9 seconds




Compared to...

Ginetta G32
0-60mph - 7.2 seconds




TVR S Convertible
0-60mph - 7.0 seconds




Toyota Supra 3.0i
0-60mph - 7.7 seconds




Toyota MR2 T-Bar
0-60mph - 7.7 seconds




Porsche 944s
0-60mph - 7.9 seconds




Mazda RX-7
0-60mph - 8.5 seconds




Lotus Excel S.A.
0-60mph - 8.6 seconds




1983 Porsche 911 Cabriolet
0-60mph - 6.9 seconds




1983 Lamborghini Jalpa
0-60mph - 7.2 seconds




1982 Ferrari 308 GTS
0-60mph - 7.2 seconds





Only a fraction (0.1) quicker than the NX, are these next two...

1991 Porsche 911 Carrera 2
0-60mph - 6.8 seconds




Ferrari Mondial
0-60mph - 6.8 seconds




And finally, the NX is not faster than this either.
But consider that it is less than 2 seconds behind, and according to my old books, the Testarossa was only rated for 5.8 seconds back in 1987 (only 1.1 faster). Although other online figures today do rate it for 5.0 seconds. Still slower than a Porsche Macan Turbo.

Ferrari Testarossa




Feel free to add more, if you think of any

Last edited by dunebuggy; 02-17-15 at 09:51 PM.
Old 02-17-15, 10:25 PM
  #2  
mwl7698
Driver
 
mwl7698's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very interesting perspective. Thanks for sharing!
Old 02-18-15, 10:42 AM
  #3  
MerlinT
Rookie
 
MerlinT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Qc
Posts: 85
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow! Very nice pictures, and souvenirs
Old 02-18-15, 11:13 AM
  #4  
Swacer
Lexus Test Driver
 
Swacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

This isn't overly surprising, the 1980s was a rather poor time for cars considering we were on the back half of the oil crisis and the bull%#(*$ emissions standards.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MashinA
Car Chat
62
05-22-18 08:20 AM
vanson350
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015)
52
07-17-16 09:50 AM
LickSauce
GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020)
6
08-21-12 09:17 AM
gemini1
CL of Southern California
2
06-02-12 05:45 PM
Kingdavid
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
19
02-27-12 07:51 PM



Quick Reply: Cars from the 1980s you might think are faster than the NX (but aren't)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:54 PM.