NX - 1st Gen (2015-2021)

300h or 300 reliability/longevity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-19, 05:20 PM
  #16  
ross7777
Lead Lap
 
ross7777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MN
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

If your main concern is reliability/longevity then I wouldn't buy the first year of a redesign. Most of the bugs are worked out a couple years after the redesign. I'll take the 2019 NX over the RDX any day for reliability/longevity.
Old 01-15-19, 05:41 PM
  #17  
TechNut
Pole Position
 
TechNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,686
Received 719 Likes on 526 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ukrkoz
You mean - 200? Not 300? NX200?
Starting with the 2018 model year the NX 200t was renamed to NX 300. They did not change the name of the hybrid, which remains a 300h. I believe he was comparing the new models as he referenced a 2019 RDX.
The following users liked this post:
ukrkoz (01-16-19)
Old 01-15-19, 06:02 PM
  #18  
Ma23peas
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
Ma23peas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: TX
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ross7777



The NX requires premium fuel as does the RDX. The new RDX is an unknown due to the redesign. Comparing to the previous years won’t matter as it’s a different engine and transmission.

I also liked the pano roof in the RDX but there are no incentives on the RDX. You’re going to pay a premium for it. I got a loaded NX Fsport for less than the ASpec RDX.
I think only the turbo NX (everything but the Hybrid) require the higher octane fuel, the Hybrid is recommended for 87..not the 91. The price on the RDX with the pano was 38k- it comes on all RDX...the price on the 300h is 46k, I think I can get that down to 42k...but the Acura rep tried to tell me in the 2019 there are 4 driving modes- 3 of which don’t ‘engage’ the turbo, after more clarification- you can’t turn ‘off’ turbo- but in those other modes it works more in a vacuum not taking in air? So the parts are still running at high rpms...
Old 01-15-19, 06:10 PM
  #19  
ross7777
Lead Lap
 
ross7777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MN
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ma23peas


I think only the turbo NX (everything but the Hybrid) require the higher octane fuel, the Hybrid is recommended for 87..not the 91. The price on the RDX with the pano was 38k- it comes on all RDX...the price on the 300h is 46k, I think I can get that down to 42k...but the Acura rep tried to tell me in the 2019 there are 4 driving modes- 3 of which don’t ‘engage’ the turbo, after more clarification- you can’t turn ‘off’ turbo- but in those other modes it works more in a vacuum not taking in air? So the parts are still running at high rpms...
$38K? Is that for the base model? The NX 300h at $46K likely has more options but has less than 200hp.

The turbo is always on. The driving modes in the RDX change the steering and shifting.
Old 01-15-19, 06:28 PM
  #20  
Ma23peas
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
Ma23peas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: TX
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ross7777
$38K? Is that for the base model? The NX 300h at $46K likely has more options but has less than 200hp.

The turbo is always on. The driving modes in the RDX change the steering and shifting.
The one I test drove was 38k, it had seat memory and a couple of extras but did not have the blind spot alarm- so it was not loaded, but did have seat warmers...odd how different companies make some things standard like the pano roof but not on safety features.
My husband (I’m a she ) really wants the max safety features like the extra sensors/cameras the Lexus offers, I think fully loaded the RDX was around 42k
Old 01-15-19, 06:46 PM
  #21  
ross7777
Lead Lap
 
ross7777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MN
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ma23peas

The one I test drove was 38k, it had seat memory and a couple of extras but did not have the blind spot alarm- so it was not loaded, but did have seat warmers...odd how different companies make some things standard like the pano roof but not on safety features.
My husband (I’m a she ) really wants the max safety features like the extra sensors/cameras the Lexus offers, I think fully loaded the RDX was around 42k
The RDX comes in 4 flavors: Standard (no BSM, Rear cross traffic or parking sensors), Tech, A-Spec and Advance. With or without AWD.

FWD $37.4K to $45.5K
AWD $37.4K to $47.5K

All models of the RDX do have Lane Keeping Assist but the NX does not. The NX has Lane Departure Alert.

The NX is different as it's Base, F-Sport and Hybrid. Then you can pick and choose options. Dealers tend to add their own options from the factory. If you want something different it's usually a special order. Also the BSM with rear cross traffic is an added option on the NX.

It's pretty confusing.

https://www.lexus.com/documents/safe...s-20180920.pdf
Old 01-16-19, 08:13 AM
  #22  
ukrkoz
Racer
 
ukrkoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: wa
Posts: 1,806
Received 225 Likes on 202 Posts
Default

Ma bad, folks. Totally forgot that there is NX300.
Persnally, if I were to buy a new car today, I'd have bought RDX. It's just much more convenient. My only caution would have been lack of GDI precautions.
Old 01-16-19, 08:17 AM
  #23  
ross7777
Lead Lap
 
ross7777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MN
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ukrkoz
Ma bad, folks. Totally forgot that there is NX300.
Persnally, if I were to buy a new car today, I'd have bought RDX. It's just much more convenient. My only caution would have been lack of GDI precautions.
I drove the 2019 RDX. It’s slightly bigger but not sure it’s more convenient. Reliability is definitely an issue being it’s a redesign with new engine and 10 speed transmission. I’d wait for the bugs to be ironed out. I wasn’t willing to risk it.
The following users liked this post:
ukrkoz (01-18-19)
Old 01-18-19, 03:57 PM
  #24  
ukrkoz
Racer
 
ukrkoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: wa
Posts: 1,806
Received 225 Likes on 202 Posts
Default

Of course but - you have significantly more Cf of space and significantly more HP. Now one or two. More. Knowing Honda, it likely will be OK.
Engine
235-hp, 2.0-liter I-4 (premium) 272-hp, 2.0-liter I-4 (premium)
Passenger Volume
72 cu.ft. 104 cu.ft.
Interior Cargo Volume
17.7 cu.ft. 29.5 cu.ft.
Old 01-18-19, 04:25 PM
  #25  
ross7777
Lead Lap
 
ross7777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: MN
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ukrkoz
Of course but - you have significantly more Cf of space and significantly more HP. Now one or two. More. Knowing Honda, it likely will be OK.
Engine
235-hp, 2.0-liter I-4 (premium) 272-hp, 2.0-liter I-4 (premium)
Passenger Volume
72 cu.ft. 104 cu.ft.
Interior Cargo Volume
17.7 cu.ft. 29.5 cu.ft.
17.7 cu ft is measured with the rear privacy cover in place. Is much larger in reality.

And Honda/Acura has had many issues with transmissions over the years.

Last edited by ross7777; 01-18-19 at 04:30 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
net4n6
Performance & Maintenance
3
04-03-15 04:46 AM
genjix
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
14
05-24-14 02:49 PM
longdrive
Maintenance
3
08-17-11 10:43 AM
chadb5646
ES - 1st to 4th Gen (1990-2006)
6
01-29-11 12:03 PM
RA073123
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
16
08-06-08 09:35 AM



Quick Reply: 300h or 300 reliability/longevity



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:21 PM.