SR20DET engine in a SC
#32
just an fyi the jgtc cars arent a stock 3s for those who are thinking about it. its a custom block...look on toysport they have the motor and it costs as much as a decent sc. plus to make a car with that swap it would be completely unreliable with how much tuning would have to be done. i dont have a link to the motor they use but i know for sure that its no where close to a stock 3s.....some sort of customized block aka not worth your time unless u can **** away money...
#34
Originally Posted by sc300tt
First person that swaps an SR into an SC gets punched in the cooter.
I'd just go 1JZ with a big single, chuck out the stock seats (front and rear) for lighter sports seats up front, and get some good suspension and boost running.
Check out Hyper Rev for the Soarer... plenty of race-tuned Soarers pushing around 700
#36
if you guy's do a search you well find i was talking about doing a 3s-gte swap a while back, i think it's a ggreat idea, an with those motors it isent hard to make power with them lets just stop an think (lighter motor+ same power= going faster) i like that equation...an for the record in my opinion no idea is a bad idea...you dont get famous by being like every one else you do by being unique!!! dont go with the flow , mae your own
#37
Originally Posted by MyScRuNmIa
if you guy's do a search you well find i was talking about doing a 3s-gte swap a while back, i think it's a ggreat idea, an with those motors it isent hard to make power with them lets just stop an think (lighter motor+ same power= going faster) i like that equation...an for the record in my opinion no idea is a bad idea...you dont get famous by being like every one else you do by being unique!!! dont go with the flow , mae your own
you want to do something unique put a 2jz or 1jz in with a v-mount setup, i have yet to see that done. if you plan on putting a 3s-gte in your sc more power to ya, but it better be strictly a show or track car because i doubt something that radical would make a nice reliable daily driver
#39
Originally Posted by sc300ccret
Because swapping a SR20DET for weight reduction is like pissing in the ocean. It doesn't matter that much.
not that i'm agreeing with dropping an sr20 in a sc.
#40
Originally Posted by sc300tt
First person that swaps an SR into an SC gets punched in the cooter.
#41
Originally Posted by jazn671
actually, when i went to japan, quoting Koyama from JUN, i asked why they tossed the rb26 in favor of the sr20, his response was "we can make the same amount of power as the rb26 with the sr20 in our skyline.
not that i'm agreeing with dropping an sr20 in a sc.
not that i'm agreeing with dropping an sr20 in a sc.
not to be a **** but that shows nothing. there still is no torque through the midrange and it only produces the "same power" at top end. in reality how long are u in the upper 90% of the rev-range when driving? i for sure am no where close...im more towards the 3-4.5 max daily driving let along the lag that would be produced from running a turbo big enough to get to the same power level. those cars are strictly for track use or top speed highway runs. look at the jun supra that has the 3s in it...its fast thats for damn sure but its built to be a top speed car where they need stability. around town where it would be stop and go it would take forever for the turbo to spool to make enough power to get that thing moving....maybe im retarded but from the physics classes and automotive classes i've taken its just not smart unless its to look pretty or go for top speed.
#43
Originally Posted by sc300tt
First person that swaps an SR into an SC gets punched in the cooter.
#44
Originally Posted by vipsoarer
not to be a **** but that shows nothing. there still is no torque through the midrange and it only produces the "same power" at top end. in reality how long are u in the upper 90% of the rev-range when driving? i for sure am no where close...im more towards the 3-4.5 max daily driving let along the lag that would be produced from running a turbo big enough to get to the same power level. those cars are strictly for track use or top speed highway runs. look at the jun supra that has the 3s in it...its fast thats for damn sure but its built to be a top speed car where they need stability. around town where it would be stop and go it would take forever for the turbo to spool to make enough power to get that thing moving....maybe im retarded but from the physics classes and automotive classes i've taken its just not smart unless its to look pretty or go for top speed.
like i said in my previous statement, i'm not agreeing of dropping a sr20 in a sc.
#45
Ummmmmm, not to sure on this because I'm way to busy to watch any large amount of JGTC. But aren't the Supras powered by turboed 1UZFE motors. I could swear that they are. I know that the GT300..... or is it GT500 class Fairladys are powered by destroked (3.5 down to 3.0 liter) VQ30DETT's.