New Dyno numbers for the SC300!
08-25-05, 02:06 PM
#20
Lead Lap
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey congrates....very nice numbers. I'm wondering what turbine A/R your running? Just asking so I can put some idea of spool up with that turbo in regards to other turbine choices.
Thanks
Thanks
08-25-05, 02:28 PM
#22
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Well, it depends on what you are asking on the "a/r" or turbine side. My hotside/exhaust a/r is 1.02
As for the wheel, let's just say its larger than a 76mm
On the dyno we are dead on 11.2:1, which should translate into about 11.5-11.7:1 on the street. Leaner is meaner, but I don't I am pretty conservative.
These numbers were all done on 110 octane with 12 degrees of timing... VERY conservative!
As for the wheel, let's just say its larger than a 76mm
On the dyno we are dead on 11.2:1, which should translate into about 11.5-11.7:1 on the street. Leaner is meaner, but I don't I am pretty conservative.
These numbers were all done on 110 octane with 12 degrees of timing... VERY conservative!
08-25-05, 02:31 PM
#23
Lead Lap
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by quikturbo
Well, it depends on what you are asking on the "a/r" or turbine side. My hotside/exhaust a/r is 1.02
As for the wheel, let's just say its larger than a 76mm
On the dyno we are dead on 11.2:1, which should translate into about 11.5-11.7:1 on the street. Leaner is meaner, but I don't I am pretty conservative.
These numbers were all done on 110 octane with 12 degrees of timing... VERY conservative!
As for the wheel, let's just say its larger than a 76mm
On the dyno we are dead on 11.2:1, which should translate into about 11.5-11.7:1 on the street. Leaner is meaner, but I don't I am pretty conservative.
These numbers were all done on 110 octane with 12 degrees of timing... VERY conservative!
Good info, thanks again. My assumption will be that your spools a tiny bit slower than a "standard" GT42R thenm if that sounds correct to you?
