anyone know why 95 are faster than pre 95? sc400
#18
I had a 95 SC and a 92 Sc at the same time last year. I asked my friend to run with me and we did a little drag race and my 95 did pull 1 and half car length ahead... but that doesn't mean anything( I drive better )
Anyway, I have had 5 SCs now, and I can tell you, pre 98 Sc4 drives the same!!
Anyway, I have had 5 SCs now, and I can tell you, pre 98 Sc4 drives the same!!
#19
Originally Posted by SC4Hundo
i thought i read somewhere that pre 95s had a clutch driven mechanical fan, which would drain a little power, but than again, that might have been for the 300
#21
^^ nope, the SC's are always the last to get the added goodies. we didnt' even get HID's when they started introducing them in 98
92-95 same engine same ratings 250hp/260tq tho it has been said over and over again by jbrady and others with proof from dynos that the actual flywheel hp is more likely 230hp.
96-97 engines got the bump in compression, change in cams, and other things i can't recall right now. those engines are moreso accurate in their ratings of 260hp/270tq.
98-00 engines obviously got the vvti's and got to 290hp/300tq.
92-95 same engine same ratings 250hp/260tq tho it has been said over and over again by jbrady and others with proof from dynos that the actual flywheel hp is more likely 230hp.
96-97 engines got the bump in compression, change in cams, and other things i can't recall right now. those engines are moreso accurate in their ratings of 260hp/270tq.
98-00 engines obviously got the vvti's and got to 290hp/300tq.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post