Performance & Maintenance Engine, forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.
View Poll Results: which would you do?
2JZ-GE
51
16.50%
2JZ-GTE
136
44.01%
1JZ-GTE
73
23.62%
1UZ-FE
49
15.86%
Voters: 309. You may not vote on this poll

Engine Pro's and Con's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-07 | 10:10 PM
  #46  
SUPRMSC's Avatar
SUPRMSC
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,469
Likes: 0
From: Classified
Default

There is so much inaccurate information in this thread presented by idiots who know nothing about jdm or usdm toyota motors that Im not even going to try to clear things up.
Old 02-15-07 | 07:03 AM
  #47  
skeet94's Avatar
skeet94
Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: England, UK
Default

I'd go for a 2JZ-GTE VVTi block - 2nd Gen Aristo swap. If in future you're looking at higher power gains a 3.4L Stroker kit along with the VVTi functionality will give you some killer midrange power/torque along with quicker spoolup than it's non-VVTi 2JZ-GTE brethren - my plan anyway.

Even non stroked the VVTi has better midrange power and seamless transition between the 1st and 2nd turbo where with the non-VVTi you can feel a dip when the transition takes place. The VVTi has weaker rods than the non-VVTi but is still good for 500+rwhp where the stock non VVTi rods are capable of 900+rwhp .

Depends on your goals overall. Are you looking for a high revving 3.0L (8500rpm) or a low revving high displacement 1UZ. Are you looking at custom parts (1UZ) for high horsepower or solid off the shelf aftermarket with the 2JZ-GTE with or without VVTi.

If you give out a bit more detail as to what your goals are with the swap we may be able to give you a better opinion as to what you could go with. I'd say 2JZ-GTE as you can easily get 450rwhp with the stock twins...or a 2JZ-GTE with small single for 500rwhp plus! . Swap might cost more, but more power will cost not so much as the other options (1JZ/1UZ/etc).
Old 02-16-07 | 05:42 PM
  #48  
5spdSC300's Avatar
5spdSC300
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Lucky SC
they claimed to have experience with either a supra or a swap in to an sc. like i said i dunno, its hard not to believe it when 5 people post it in a row regardless of its validity. all they said was lower compression in non vvti means better for boosting.

its pointless to argue this with you though bc i don't know about it, i'm going on a he said/she said argument

Im not trying to get into an argument with you but just tired of seeing false information posted. I really respect that your being honest and can distinguish what's "he said/she said" and what's the truth. A lot of people on the internet take what they read as truths and start posting it as the truth.

Just some FYI, the 2jzgte VVTi motor has the same compression as the non VVTi so the compression statement goes out the window. They both have 86x86 bore and stroke with a 8.5 compression. The non vvti motor makes 315ft/tq @ 3600rpm and the vvti motor makes 335ft/tq @ 3600rpm. The extra 20ft/tq is coming from the vvti head since the block has the same compression. The vvti head really helps with power under the curve.
Old 02-16-07 | 11:20 PM
  #49  
Lucky SC's Avatar
Lucky SC
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by 5spdSC300
Im not trying to get into an argument with you but just tired of seeing false information posted. I really respect that your being honest and can distinguish what's "he said/she said" and what's the truth. A lot of people on the internet take what they read as truths and start posting it as the truth.

Just some FYI, the 2jzgte VVTi motor has the same compression as the non VVTi so the compression statement goes out the window. They both have 86x86 bore and stroke with a 8.5 compression. The non vvti motor makes 315ft/tq @ 3600rpm and the vvti motor makes 335ft/tq @ 3600rpm. The extra 20ft/tq is coming from the vvti head since the block has the same compression. The vvti head really helps with power under the curve.
cool, ty

so go vvti in other words?
Old 02-18-07 | 11:57 AM
  #50  
1badsoarer's Avatar
1badsoarer
Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: okinawa
Default

I've had some experience with both motors, and I prefer the 1j over the 2j. I like RPM's, that's where the 1j comes in. Granted the 2j can make big #'s, but at low RPM. Tq x RPM = a win lol. I've beat several 2j's with the same or more power because I have more RPM.
Old 02-19-07 | 12:39 AM
  #51  
TRD_Power's Avatar
TRD_Power
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 78
From: Crappy ol' Texas
Default

1UZ here. I just like how it sounds with my RMM exhaust and it's super reliable without a turbo or anything. If your 1JZ or 2JZ could whoop my ***, that's fine by me I still love the turbo SC300s.
Old 02-19-07 | 12:01 PM
  #52  
Psionic's Avatar
Psionic
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by 5spdSC300
You can't believe everything you read online. I have never seen any concrete proof of why the vvti 2jzgte motor is weaker. Do the people that claim this have first hand experience with the engine or is just posting from hear say?
I did the search and the vvt-i rods are about 1/2 the size of the non-vvti rods. Cute little things.

Although, this wouldnt stop me from dropping a vvti head on a ge block...
Old 03-13-07 | 02:18 PM
  #53  
eHIGH's Avatar
eHIGH
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Psionic
I did the search and the vvt-i rods are about 1/2 the size of the non-vvti rods. Cute little things.

Although, this wouldnt stop me from dropping a vvti head on a ge block...
I was thinking about that
Old 03-13-07 | 04:04 PM
  #54  
5spdSC300's Avatar
5spdSC300
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

I stand corrected. I always though the small rods, which started in 98, only applied to the ge engines.
Old 03-13-07 | 06:06 PM
  #55  
Lucky SC's Avatar
Lucky SC
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

soooo go with non vvti now? lol
Old 03-13-07 | 06:14 PM
  #56  
over40driv's Avatar
over40driv
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 2
From: In
Default

Im curious, is this really a debate detween vvti or non. I thought 98-2000 would be superior, only more costly.
Old 04-10-07 | 07:55 PM
  #57  
Fireblaze's Avatar
Fireblaze
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

So where to find a 1JZ so cheap? Someone said something about it being near 500?
Old 04-11-07 | 04:07 AM
  #58  
plex's Avatar
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 75
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by Fireblaze
So where to find a 1JZ so cheap? Someone said something about it being near 500?
You can find a long block for that price. Check ebay or supraforums but you will need harness ecu etc......
Old 04-11-07 | 09:51 AM
  #59  
mcoski's Avatar
mcoski
Rookie
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
From: tx
Default

Someone find me a 2jzgte/6spd combo
Old 04-12-07 | 07:29 AM
  #60  
plex's Avatar
plex
1UZFE/2JZGTE
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 75
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by mcoski
Someone find me a 2jzgte/6spd combo
You can find those easier than a soarer 5spd combo they will cost a lot more there's a vvti 2jzgte/getrag combo on *bay well at least it was last night.


Quick Reply: Engine Pro's and Con's



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:24 AM.