Performance & Maintenance Engine, forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

pte billet 5857...im in love

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-11, 03:23 PM
  #16  
StiCk3
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (5)
 
StiCk3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IN
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

+1 for a dyno sheet. what sort of fuel tune are you using for it?
Old 04-11-11, 09:26 PM
  #17  
okula247
Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
okula247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: al
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wackass AFC but I'm thinkin about waiting to get it tuned and dynoed after I get cams and aem
Old 05-28-11, 05:44 AM
  #18  
okula247
Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
okula247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: al
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Finally dynoed.. 5857 398whp 351tq. 19 psi stock cams,afc , 550s
Old 05-28-11, 06:45 AM
  #19  
HiPSI
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
HiPSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 945
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by non_silvia
well, lets wait until the dyno graph, but I'm inclined to agree that there will be 'some' loss of top end, but it's not like he slapped a 16g on there. i think it should still perform admirably below 20psi.
Exactly, It might be smaller then most of us would of gone but it'll make the car extremely street driveable.
Old 05-28-11, 09:22 AM
  #20  
BartleDoo
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
BartleDoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: fl
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by okula247
Finally dynoed.. 5857 398whp 351tq. 19 psi stock cams,afc , 550s
Post up the graph!
Old 05-28-11, 11:27 AM
  #21  
okula247
Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
okula247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: al
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ill take a pic n email someone if they post it for me
Old 05-28-11, 01:59 PM
  #22  
non_silvia
Rookie
 
non_silvia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fl
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Solid numbers!
Old 05-28-11, 05:29 PM
  #23  
RX7 RAGE
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (18)
 
RX7 RAGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,411
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Was it lean at 19 psi or still relatively safe?
Old 05-28-11, 05:43 PM
  #24  
BartleDoo
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
BartleDoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: fl
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ksteckba@mail.usf.edu I'll post them for you.
Old 05-29-11, 05:08 AM
  #25  
okula247
Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
okula247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: al
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It was def. Safe at 19...

Gonna take pic of old gt40 graph n new graph tonight n email u thanks for offering to post it
Old 05-29-11, 08:14 AM
  #26  
HiPSI
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
HiPSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 945
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by okula247
It was def. Safe at 19...

Gonna take pic of old gt40 graph n new graph tonight n email u thanks for offering to post it
Photobucket.com
Old 05-29-11, 12:01 PM
  #27  
okula247
Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
okula247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: al
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't have photobucket account and I'm using my phone online for internet which makes everything more annoying. I took the pic of the graph with my phone n that's not gonna work u can't make out any of the numbers on the graph. I'm just gonna have him email me the graphs.

Last edited by okula247; 05-29-11 at 05:32 PM.
Old 05-29-11, 10:07 PM
  #28  
Munki
Driver School Candidate
 
Munki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tx
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seems like you picked the wrong turbo... The 5857 with such a small A/R is ideal for a much smaller displacement engines. Im pretty sure you're getting way to much back pressure and reverting air back into the combustion chambers. JZ engines require much more air to leave the engine at a faster rate to be efficient and reliable.

Id like to see both dyno graphs, post them up when you get a chance!
Old 05-30-11, 05:27 AM
  #29  
non_silvia
Rookie
 
non_silvia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fl
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Munki
Seems like you picked the wrong turbo... The 5857 with such a small A/R is ideal for a much smaller displacement engines. Im pretty sure you're getting way to much back pressure and reverting air back into the combustion chambers. JZ engines require much more air to leave the engine at a faster rate to be efficient and reliable.

Id like to see both dyno graphs, post them up when you get a chance!
I highly doubt that his engine with the 5857 inefficient and unreliable. That was a dumb post. If toyota put twin ct12's or the single ct15on a stock 1jz, was the stock engine unreliable or inefficient? No. Any improvement over stock is an improvement. I agree that there different turbo combinations available that are more popular (or in your case, "more effecient"), but everyone has different goals for thier cars. Saying he picked the wrong turbo without understanding his goals for the car is retarded. What turbo is on your car? (edit: your running stock turbos sir. Try again)

Last edited by non_silvia; 05-30-11 at 06:26 AM.
Old 05-30-11, 08:36 AM
  #30  
Munki
Driver School Candidate
 
Munki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tx
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by non_silvia
I highly doubt that his engine with the 5857 inefficient and unreliable. That was a dumb post. If toyota put twin ct12's or the single ct15on a stock 1jz, was the stock engine unreliable or inefficient? No. Any improvement over stock is an improvement. I agree that there different turbo combinations available that are more popular (or in your case, "more effecient"), but everyone has different goals for thier cars. Saying he picked the wrong turbo without understanding his goals for the car is retarded. What turbo is on your car? (edit: your running stock turbos sir. Try again)
What are the specs on those two ct12 if you don't mind me asking? If both dyno graphs get posted up I'll show you exactly what I'm talking about.

And what makes you think I'm running stock turbos? I'm not even running a jz engine set btw, and the TWO turbos I'm running are the size of your head.


Quick Reply: pte billet 5857...im in love



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:49 PM.