JOEZ intake Dyno results and videos (Independently Tested)
01-29-08, 04:38 AM
#17
umm... Am I the only person who sees the correction factor on the stock is .96 and the Joe Z pipe is on 1.00.
This means that the stock is making .04% less than on the rating scale as the Joe Z pimp.
Also meaning the the Joe Z numbers are exaggerated and the stock intake actually makes about 4whp more than the Joe Z.
Sorry....
This means that the stock is making .04% less than on the rating scale as the Joe Z pimp.
Also meaning the the Joe Z numbers are exaggerated and the stock intake actually makes about 4whp more than the Joe Z.
Sorry....
The SAE correction factor used by Dynojet assumes that lower air density at the sensor box means lower air pressure in the intake manifold. So in this case the software is applying a .04-percent correction factor on the #7 run to compensate for a loss of air density that the engine never sees.
And for what it's worth. Here is an updated dyno journal showing all relevant data. Check out runs 7 and 37. They are both .96 SAE correction and they are my lowest and highest. Interesting, huh?
Uncorrected:
BTW..not very positive first 2 posts you have here on Clublexus. Makes me kinda wonder what your motive is.
Last edited by caymandive; 01-29-08 at 05:51 AM.
01-30-08, 05:54 AM
#21
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are incorrect.
The SAE correction factor used by Dynojet assumes that lower air density at the sensor box means lower air pressure in the intake manifold. So in this case the software is applying a .04-percent correction factor on the #7 run to compensate for a loss of air density that the engine never sees.
And for what it's worth. Here is an updated dyno journal showing all relevant data. Check out runs 7 and 37. They are both .96 SAE correction and they are my lowest and highest. Interesting, huh?
The SAE correction factor used by Dynojet assumes that lower air density at the sensor box means lower air pressure in the intake manifold. So in this case the software is applying a .04-percent correction factor on the #7 run to compensate for a loss of air density that the engine never sees.
And for what it's worth. Here is an updated dyno journal showing all relevant data. Check out runs 7 and 37. They are both .96 SAE correction and they are my lowest and highest. Interesting, huh?
BTW - I thought the other member brought up a valid question.
01-30-08, 07:26 AM
#22
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fl
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are incorrect.
The SAE correction factor used by Dynojet assumes that lower air density at the sensor box means lower air pressure in the intake manifold. So in this case the software is applying a .04-percent correction factor on the #7 run to compensate for a loss of air density that the engine never sees.
And for what it's worth. Here is an updated dyno journal showing all relevant data. Check out runs 7 and 37. They are both .96 SAE correction and they are my lowest and highest. Interesting, huh?
BTW..not very positive first 2 posts you have here on Clublexus. Makes me kinda wonder what your motive is.
The SAE correction factor used by Dynojet assumes that lower air density at the sensor box means lower air pressure in the intake manifold. So in this case the software is applying a .04-percent correction factor on the #7 run to compensate for a loss of air density that the engine never sees.
And for what it's worth. Here is an updated dyno journal showing all relevant data. Check out runs 7 and 37. They are both .96 SAE correction and they are my lowest and highest. Interesting, huh?
BTW..not very positive first 2 posts you have here on Clublexus. Makes me kinda wonder what your motive is.
I'm just doing my research since I may be buying an IS350 very shortly.
My apologies about the accusation, i didnt see the different dyno room temps, i assumed they were back to back and were the same temp. A 20 deg difference is huge in terms of dyno numbers.
My initial thoughts were WTF, all these guys are buying something on the assumption theyre making more power.
Is there a website i can look at the Joe Z parts, a quick search on google located nothing.
Cheers!
01-30-08, 07:38 AM
#23
http://www.l-tunedparts.com/model/st...d=113&cat_id=1
01-30-08, 08:50 AM
#24
I wouldn't be surprised if the K&N intake pulled harder at mid / upper RPMs. Of course, this sensation could just be caused by a reduction down low that makes it seem more powerfull up top. The change in the length of the intake could also cause a resonant hump in the upper RPMs. AEM CAIs were notorious for doing that on S2000's.
01-30-08, 08:56 AM
#25
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i'm still pretty interested to see what the extra cut hole int he F-Sport intake will be for. is it just a hole in the box or what, and how could it increase performance
01-30-08, 09:54 AM
#30
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts