Supercharger IN!
08-19-06, 04:07 AM
#76
uh, read the #'s on the dyno sheet and do some simple math, 293 - 265 = 28... 
i don't mind posting the dyno's up but it's just gona be like what JoeZ said in his result before doing the whole intake shabam, i've showed it to a few .netters already; done @ Ingen, 20+ runs in 2 weeks, a/c off is 265whp, a/c on is 245whp, they did it in the morning, afternoon, early night time; +/- 1~2whp difference in the avg; car was almost new had less than 700 miles on it.
anyways, that #'s nothing special, any normal 350 can make that to the ground easily.
i don't mind posting the dyno's up but it's just gona be like what JoeZ said in his result before doing the whole intake shabam, i've showed it to a few .netters already; done @ Ingen, 20+ runs in 2 weeks, a/c off is 265whp, a/c on is 245whp, they did it in the morning, afternoon, early night time; +/- 1~2whp difference in the avg; car was almost new had less than 700 miles on it.
anyways, that #'s nothing special, any normal 350 can make that to the ground easily.
why would a car dyno less with the a/c on... at wot, the a/c doesnt engage anyway...
Ive dynoed hundreds of cars, and it makes no difference. And in my experience.. in order of lowest reading to highest reading, it goes: Mustang Dyno, DynoJet, Dyno Dynamics, Dynapack... just my own personal experience... any dyno operator can screw with the numbers, by adjusting correction factor, dyno room temp, upping tire pressure, etc...
08-19-06, 06:37 AM
#77
uh, read the #'s on the dyno sheet and do some simple math, 293 - 265 = 28...
i don't mind posting the dyno's up but it's just gona be like what JoeZ said in his result before doing the whole intake shabam, i've showed it to a few .netters already; done @ Ingen, 20+ runs in 2 weeks, a/c off is 265whp, a/c on is 245whp, they did it in the morning, afternoon, early night time; +/- 1~2whp difference in the avg; car was almost new had less than 700 miles on it.
anyways, that #'s nothing special, any normal 350 can make that to the ground easily.
i don't mind posting the dyno's up but it's just gona be like what JoeZ said in his result before doing the whole intake shabam, i've showed it to a few .netters already; done @ Ingen, 20+ runs in 2 weeks, a/c off is 265whp, a/c on is 245whp, they did it in the morning, afternoon, early night time; +/- 1~2whp difference in the avg; car was almost new had less than 700 miles on it.
anyways, that #'s nothing special, any normal 350 can make that to the ground easily.
here is my dyno. the 3 runs are 1 after the other done on a DYNOJET. take a look at the diffrences in whp and wtq...
I'm not sure if it was mentioned, but I believe his were don on a mustang dyno which reads lower (at least I think its lower) than a dynojet.
Last edited by carlos; 08-19-06 at 06:40 AM.
08-19-06, 06:45 AM
#78
Pole Position
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are you really this dense? this was done on a DIFFERENT dyno. jesus christ, get it through your head!
here is my dyno. the 3 runs are 1 after the other done on a DYNOJET. take a look at the diffrences in whp and wtq...
I'm not sure if it was mentioned, but I believe his were don on a mustang dyno which reads lower (at least I think its lower) than a dynojet.
here is my dyno. the 3 runs are 1 after the other done on a DYNOJET. take a look at the diffrences in whp and wtq...
I'm not sure if it was mentioned, but I believe his were don on a mustang dyno which reads lower (at least I think its lower) than a dynojet.
It only ran at 293.50whp, DynoJet.
-Brian
08-19-06, 10:32 AM
#79
Lead Lap
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
are you really this dense? this was done on a DIFFERENT dyno. jesus christ, get it through your head!
here is my dyno. the 3 runs are 1 after the other done on a DYNOJET. take a look at the diffrences in whp and wtq...
I'm not sure if it was mentioned, but I believe his were don on a mustang dyno which reads lower (at least I think its lower) than a dynojet.
here is my dyno. the 3 runs are 1 after the other done on a DYNOJET. take a look at the diffrences in whp and wtq...
I'm not sure if it was mentioned, but I believe his were don on a mustang dyno which reads lower (at least I think its lower) than a dynojet.
08-19-06, 07:06 PM
#81
Pole Position
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-19-06, 08:14 PM
#82
Pole Position
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a side note...I just got done reading the Fujita intake/dyno testing post and I must say I can't wait to meet up and do some real world driving tests to shut the skeptics up once and for all. The guys at Groupe5 Motorsports in San Diego (where I got my ride half slammed) have nothing but positive things to say about Fujita.
08-20-06, 08:51 AM
#83
Keeeez, (may have missed an e)
Some battles you just can't win because some people are too stupid to know they are losing.....I love my intake, and since I am not affluent enough to purchase this supercharger, it's going to have to do.
Some battles you just can't win because some people are too stupid to know they are losing.....I love my intake, and since I am not affluent enough to purchase this supercharger, it's going to have to do.
08-21-06, 07:28 AM
#85
Time to clear some things up: 1. LMS put my car on their Mustang Dyno. He said (i don't have a copy nor did i see it) 250 whp to 301 whp with the supercharger. When I got my car back to the office (Fujita) i put it on the dynojet but reading almost 294. Yes Dynojet should read higher but you can hear the belt slipping. It needs to be adjusted but we decided to wait until putting in the new pulley. Perhaps today or tomorrow it will be put in. Out of every member here, I think I have the slowest IS35o stock. It has to be because of my wheels. There is nothing else I can think of. I have stock exhaust,I HAD the Fujita intake, bigger brakes, 19 x 10 rears,275 tires....maybe it is the ARC oil cap or the tint slowing me down. FYI, I paid in the 5k range ok? No more guessing. As long as my belt stops slipping, I am happy. Considering my brakes cost $2800 for two and my wheels retail at $700 each not including tires, the s/c price is not too bad. At least now, I don't have the slowest IS350 on this board.
08-21-06, 07:36 AM
#86
I'm not trying to slam the product or those that install them. I'm just disappointed that the power gain per dollar is so low. Forced induction was the absolute biggest bang per buck in my previous cars. I would expect to hear comments like "DAYUMM! This thing is a friggin' rocket!" after getting an S/C, but instead, I'm hearing "Yes you can defintely feel and hear it". LOL
08-21-06, 08:10 AM
#87
Tech Info Resource
iTrader: (2)
At nearly 12:1 static compression, where is the surprise?
Also, with a patented piston shape, who is going to seriously build pistons for this engine?
Also, with a patented piston shape, who is going to seriously build pistons for this engine?
08-21-06, 08:33 AM
#88
I'm not trying to slam the product or those that install them. I'm just disappointed that the power gain per dollar is so low. Forced induction was the absolute biggest bang per buck in my previous cars. I would expect to hear comments like "DAYUMM! This thing is a friggin' rocket!" after getting an S/C, but instead, I'm hearing "Yes you can defintely feel and hear it". LOL
Bang per buck, take a look at the LMS and Fujita intakes available. You can spend upwards of $200+ for maybe 5hp over a stock 259hp dyno is about a .019 or 2% gain!
So basically around $200 for each 2% gain on this car. This supercharger kit that nets approx 50hp and at $200 per 2% gain to total the claimed 50hp increase in power = $5000 bucks.
08-21-06, 08:49 AM
#89
Lexus Champion
LMS supercharger ($5000) is about a 20% gain in power. That isn't bad IMHO and matches the current price per hp as the $200 SRI available now (LMS, Fujita).
Bang per buck, take a look at the LMS and Fujita intakes available. You can spend upwards of $200+ for maybe 5hp over a stock 259hp dyno is about a .019 or 2% gain!
So basically around $200 for each 2% gain on this car. This supercharger kit that nets approx 50hp and at $200 per 2% gain to total the claimed 50hp increase in power = $5000 bucks.
Bang per buck, take a look at the LMS and Fujita intakes available. You can spend upwards of $200+ for maybe 5hp over a stock 259hp dyno is about a .019 or 2% gain!
So basically around $200 for each 2% gain on this car. This supercharger kit that nets approx 50hp and at $200 per 2% gain to total the claimed 50hp increase in power = $5000 bucks.
As lobux stated, the high compression is what's keeping the potential down.