Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

Reasoning behind lack of T/C or S/C's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-07, 11:38 AM
  #16  
newis350
Pole Position
 
newis350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lextasy89
theres actually 2 s/c that have been out for some time... the LMS, Toms, and I read somewhere that Blitz might be developing one..
blitz gave up on a s/c, although they did showcase an is350 with a s/c at an auto show about a year ago. I am really interested to hear info about the TOM's s/c. There was a thread about someone who was installing the s/c, but there have been no updates for a while.

Has anyone heard from the guy that is doing the TOM's S/c?

Old 11-09-07, 09:04 PM
  #17  
carchitect
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
carchitect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The stock ecu in the Supra is really stupid compared to newer ecus. So installing VPC, SAFC, E-manage or even the F-con V are doable. Piggy back systems don't go well in the IS2. There might be hope is someone uses a e-manage ultimate to map the MAF meter output and A/F output and use the unit to provide additional fuel and timing control someone could very well boost an IS2.

Fabbing would be another concern. Fortunately there is room in the right side of the block but the exhaust for the left side will have to travel under the engine or behind it to get there. The downpipe would have to travel under the motor mount to exit. The largest turbocharger you could use would be a GT35R which to anyone here would be plenty but a GT30R would be ideal.

The A960E auto would be a different story. I'm not so sure how well it could holdup to the increased power.

Not to mention just like someone else had also. The high compression won't work well. You would need to reudce it and most everyone uses a thicker H/G to get there. Well this moves the heads further from each other and that won't work for the direct injection rails so you would have to use lower compression pistons and stronger rods so a built engine would be a necessity.

Do a little math and stuff adds up. I'd be willing to say the large bore and ports of the 2GR-FSE would net more power than a 2JZ-GTE at the same boost level if both are tuned well since the 2GR is much better at flowing. However, that won't come to a reality since no one here would spend the cash for such an expensive mod.

While the blower is a doable route remember that they generally are short lived units.

There are other fast cars out there that look good too aside from the MKIV Supra. 350Z, G35, R33 or R34 skyline (although these are not supposed to be here, parts are difficult to source, and the cost way too much, besides do you really want to shift with the wrong hand?) but they will be expensive to get into and will be much more than that to get that fast. Everyone would say how a supra makes 1000hp but there is a lot more truth to it and most supra owners are well aware of the truth. That kinda power looses practicality and most of us would rather have a well performing vehicle instead of bragging rights. I don't know how many supra owners I know have said how they prefer a 71mm bushing turbo over their new 74mm DDB turbo and thats considered a small turbo nowadays.
Old 11-10-07, 12:19 PM
  #18  
FASKINE
Driver School Candidate
 
FASKINE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Supercharger would be the way to go. My friend owns FULL RACE out here in AZ and trying to stuff a turbo in there would be extremely difficult to do. Of course if you have an unlimited budget go for it!!!
Old 11-10-07, 05:01 PM
  #19  
nsxiboi
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
nsxiboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BLITZ made a supercharger for the GS430. I would assume it would be possible for the IS250/350.
Old 11-12-07, 12:15 PM
  #20  
mattssi
Pole Position
 
mattssi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Smoggy, CA
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm so frustratred with the lack of options - I guess I decided too quick to get the IS350 and couldn't pass up the deal. I should have gone with the 335i - with about a grand or so worth of upgrades, they are dynoing over 400 at the wheels.

1.8 years to go on my lease and it can't come soon enough. The lack of interest on swap-a-lease sucks too.
Old 11-12-07, 01:04 PM
  #21  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,058
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

11.8:1 compression ratio doesnt exactly work well with F/I
Old 11-12-07, 01:05 PM
  #22  
Kurtz
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Kurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mattssi
I'm so frustratred with the lack of options - I guess I decided too quick to get the IS350 and couldn't pass up the deal. I should have gone with the 335i - with about a grand or so worth of upgrades, they are dynoing over 400 at the wheels.

1.8 years to go on my lease and it can't come soon enough. The lack of interest on swap-a-lease sucks too.
And boy, for those 10 minutes at a time a BMW runs properly, it's a lot of fun!
Old 11-12-07, 01:11 PM
  #23  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,058
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

yea no one ever said 400 whp on a 335 engine will last long either, would love to see that last 50k miles
Old 11-12-07, 11:25 PM
  #24  
mattssi
Pole Position
 
mattssi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Smoggy, CA
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
yea no one ever said 400 whp on a 335 engine will last long either, would love to see that last 50k miles
My point is that there are options. IS350 = none. It is why I miss my IS300 so much also.

But, I need a convertible, so can't go back to that.
Old 11-13-07, 12:46 PM
  #25  
newis350
Pole Position
 
newis350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nsxiboi
BLITZ made a supercharger for the GS430. I would assume it would be possible for the IS250/350.
no dice. the GS430 uses a 4.3 liter engine.
Old 01-10-08, 12:05 AM
  #26  
dejacky
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
dejacky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Behind you
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

don't let the 11.8:1 compression scare you from turbo charging. There are PLENTY of similar high-compression cars that have aftermarket turbo systems. I predict if you only boost 6-7psi with the IS350, you'll gain an extra ~100whp. You could use methanol injection to boost more without detonating, but I'm not sure how much boost stress these new engines can take. So, at the very minimum, boosting 6-7 psi with a proper intercooling setup is VERY do-able.
Old 01-10-08, 03:50 PM
  #27  
Kurtz
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Kurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dejacky
don't let the 11.8:1 compression scare you from turbo charging. There are PLENTY of similar high-compression cars that have aftermarket turbo systems. I predict if you only boost 6-7psi with the IS350, you'll gain an extra ~100whp. You could use methanol injection to boost more without detonating, but I'm not sure how much boost stress these new engines can take. So, at the very minimum, boosting 6-7 psi with a proper intercooling setup is VERY do-able.
IIRC the existing supercharger kit, boosting 5 lbs, only adds 40 rwhp. While a turbo avoids the parasitic loss of a supercharger it's not THAT much more efficient that it's likely to put down 150% more (40 vs 100) with 1-2 lbs more boost.
Old 01-10-08, 04:42 PM
  #28  
dejacky
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
dejacky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Behind you
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kurtz
IIRC the existing supercharger kit, boosting 5 lbs, only adds 40 rwhp. While a turbo avoids the parasitic loss of a supercharger it's not THAT much more efficient that it's likely to put down 150% more (40 vs 100) with 1-2 lbs more boost.
I gained ~100rwhp from simply boosting 7.2psi of boost on my lexus sc300's 10:1 compression stock 2jz-ge engine. With more displacement and higher compression of the IS350, you'll make more power per psi of boost. So, 100rwhp gain from simply adding a turbocharger system at 6-7psi is perfectly achievable. Also keep in mind larger turbos can make more power at the same boost level compared to smaller turbos.
Old 01-10-08, 05:00 PM
  #29  
HKS350
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
HKS350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dejacky
I gained ~100rwhp from simply boosting 7.2psi of boost on my lexus sc300's 10:1 compression stock 2jz-ge engine. With more displacement and higher compression of the IS350, you'll make more power per psi of boost. So, 100rwhp gain from simply adding a turbocharger system at 6-7psi is perfectly achievable. Also keep in mind larger turbos can make more power at the same boost level compared to smaller turbos.
This may be slightly true, But you'll never be able to run pump gas. Is350 compression is 11.8/1. another full point and you'll have to start blending fuels. you'd never get more than 5lbs out of this motor without blended fuel.
5lbs with a turbo = 50 or so HP S/C =35 HP or so...... LMS proves this point.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
I8ABMR
Car Chat
8
06-29-09 10:09 AM
Joeb427
Performance
30
03-17-08 05:53 AM
pagemaster
Car Chat
8
11-12-07 08:32 AM
alexulan
Car Chat
7
01-17-06 06:27 PM
supercoupes
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
3
08-14-02 08:30 AM



Quick Reply: Reasoning behind lack of T/C or S/C's?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:11 AM.