When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The correction factor at the top of the page says "smoothing" I don't know if that awsners your question. I'm not sure what you mean by corrected; the S.A.E. factor is set at 0.98
Thanks for posting the results! What a nice surprise!
Dare I ask if the shop gave you the dyno run files? If the dyno was a dynojet, then you can download the DynoJet run viewer software to manipulate the graphs in much more usefull ways.
Any idea what was going on with the 65 shot run? That spike kind of threw off the results.
Thanks for posting the results! What a nice surprise!
Dare I ask if the shop gave you the dyno run files? If the dyno was a dynojet, then you can download the DynoJet run viewer software to manipulate the graphs in much more usefull ways.
Any idea what was going on with the 65 shot run? That spike kind of threw off the results.
It not really about the spike but the dead spot. I was running out of NOS and this was a surge from that. and no run files
The full graph would help make more sense of the numbers. I don't see how the peak numbers were achieved on the 1st plot, since the torque never really got close to 300 on the part we see.
The full graph would help make more sense of the numbers. I don't see how the peak numbers were achieved on the 1st plot, since the torque never really got close to 300 on the part we see.
To be honest I'm more impressed by the burns X-pipe and 2.5" pipe. 278hp is nice.
That is very impressive Jeremy. So exactly how is your exhaust set up? You have the burns x pipe leading to HKS mufflers, but how is the piping done between those? Did you convert the stock to true dual or what?
12-20-07, 10:48 AM
