any piggy back out there for IS250
03-30-08, 08:55 AM
#17
Advanced
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SAFC2 works fine. I picked up 6whp by leaning out the fuel from 45k rpm and up.Fuel Reduction of @ 8%. A/F ratios are now around 13.0 wot. During the SAFC setup you can do a sensor check and all of the voltages are inline. It doesn't matter what voltages you have, the AFC just changes the value the ECU sees. From what i've seen on TIS, the voltage is the common 0-4.5 volt toyota always uses.
I know it's a typo but........ 45k RPM .... That's "Dremel" speed. Hell yeah.
03-30-08, 03:59 PM
#19
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: florida
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
omg that freaken awesome im soo gonna do that when i get all the bolt on please find the wiring diagram XD it would soo much help when i get my n my dad just could do it for me
04-01-08, 06:52 AM
#20
Yes, it seems that this type of unit is best when you add larger fuel injectors and a larger diameter MAF. Then you can use this unit to adjust the A/F ratio that was made richer by the larger then stock fuel injectors. The basic concept seems to be increasing the dynamic range of the fuel adjustment so that you can dump more fuel into a boosted motor.
For simple bolt-on's it does not seem to be of much benifit. I was actually thinking about a A/F controller to 'optimize' the fuel curve when I get the Mazzuri headers installed. This depends on how the fuel curve looks when all is said and done of course.
For simple bolt-on's it does not seem to be of much benifit. I was actually thinking about a A/F controller to 'optimize' the fuel curve when I get the Mazzuri headers installed. This depends on how the fuel curve looks when all is said and done of course.
That said, all "good" bolt-ons should lean the mixture out some on their own, but modern ECU's will adjust the fuel curve to compensate. At full throttle, the fuel curve might change a bit in shape, but it will still be richer than optimum. That's where a piggy-back can help. If tuned properly, the MAF signal can be manipulated to smooth out the air / fuel curve to give a more optimum power curve. Of course, the fuel curve of a totally stock setup usually provides the most opertunity to gain from fuel tuning since it will usually run richer than it would with good bolt-ons.
04-01-08, 08:10 AM
#22
Advanced
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys - Lots of good information here. The more I read the more I am encouraged about using a piggy back to lean these cars out just a tad.
One of my concerns was that a ISx50 with headers etc... would run lean during cruise or partial throttle conditions. It seems that during these conditions the ECU runs in a closed loop mode so it should trim itself back to "normal" for everyday driving. As long as the trims are minor adjustments there should be no CEL light.
It is my understanding that the ECU runs in open loop at WOT. Can anyone confirm this operation for these DI motors? So a piggy back could be used to make A/F adjustments without the ECU negating the adjustments based on its sensor readings over time.
Regards,
One of my concerns was that a ISx50 with headers etc... would run lean during cruise or partial throttle conditions. It seems that during these conditions the ECU runs in a closed loop mode so it should trim itself back to "normal" for everyday driving. As long as the trims are minor adjustments there should be no CEL light.
It is my understanding that the ECU runs in open loop at WOT. Can anyone confirm this operation for these DI motors? So a piggy back could be used to make A/F adjustments without the ECU negating the adjustments based on its sensor readings over time.
Regards,
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
