Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

New Supercharger for the 2GR-FSE engine from Toyota

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-10, 06:22 PM
  #16  
JDMis350
Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
JDMis350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: California
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Man THAT IS the TOMS supercharger kit.
Old 02-08-10, 12:18 AM
  #17  
IAMJAVEDG
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (5)
 
IAMJAVEDG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 2,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

looks like it would fit to me....
Old 02-08-10, 10:12 AM
  #18  
t0e
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
t0e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cali4nication-LosAngeles
Posts: 3,494
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
The budget for that project has 7 numbers before the decimal. It's not going to happen soon.
Maybe if COBB tunning was as dedicated to the IS-F / ISx platform, just as much as they are for GT-r 35, it could happen

LOL
Old 02-08-10, 10:53 AM
  #19  
ecr527
Lexus Champion
 
ecr527's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South FLA
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How big of a car is that Mark X? It looks like it would make a nice replacement for the ES350.

Having a supercharged IS would be nice, but for what it would cost and the minimal gains you would get out of it, I don't think it would be worth it.
Old 02-08-10, 11:40 AM
  #20  
iSuxeL
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (21)
 
iSuxeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 9,302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I still don't understand why people think the gain is minimal...

I've had my car boosted for a while now and there's not ONE person that wouldn't say it wasn't worth doing. Sorry OT.
Old 02-08-10, 01:25 PM
  #21  
Kurtz
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Kurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by iSuxeL
I still don't understand why people think the gain is minimal...

I've had my car boosted for a while now and there's not ONE person that wouldn't say it wasn't worth doing. Sorry OT.
The numbers quoted from the MFG themselves is about 50-55 engine hp. (355-360 engine hp, up from 306 stock).

The TOMs kit runs $10,000.

Poor gains for high cost.

For $4000 a 250 owner could get 102 more hp with a 350 (in 350 markets anyway) and for $10,000 a 350 owner could gain 108 hp with an IS-F (and get a better transmission too).


(even if you went with the $6000 cost of the LMS kit, which ran 0.8 lbs less boost, it's still a terrible bang/buck).
Old 02-08-10, 03:21 PM
  #22  
L-S-D
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (-1)
 
L-S-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: cgy,ab
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

^ that is true kurtz

------------------------------
its great you have boost dood

but jus cus you do doesent mean its worth it lol .. and i can think of THOUSANDS of ppl who think it isnt worth it , if it was really worth it do you think lms would of only sold like 3-5 ? yeah.....

i have a chance to get the same kit as you right now for 4000$ and im not gonna get it
maybe it if was new but not used

Last edited by L-S-D; 02-08-10 at 03:26 PM.
Old 02-08-10, 05:47 PM
  #23  
iSuxeL
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (21)
 
iSuxeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 9,302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You're crazy LOL I boost 7.5lbs all day. And I can assure you if you drove my car you'd jump on that kit ASAP. And for what I paid for the kit, it was something LITERALLY you would not pass up
Old 02-08-10, 05:54 PM
  #24  
L-S-D
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (-1)
 
L-S-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: cgy,ab
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Were not talking what you paid for it ,
In general the msrp of 6000$ before instal is NOT worth the kit ..
Forsure ur whip is fun to drive no doubt .. But not everyone is gonna get the kit
For what you paid right ? So point is. The lms kit is not worth the cost
For the amount of boost you get
Old 02-08-10, 07:46 PM
  #25  
ndk83
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
ndk83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DXB / AD
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Boost isnt for everyone, some people want it really bad, others dont.

Tuning (b it rims and kits, or boost) is a passion, and in most cases logic and common sense kinda goes out the window,the money spent is usually never recouped.

Kurtz L-S-D:
u both have intakes and exhausts (money not well spent in the larger scheme of things)
u basically spent around $1500 for around 4-5 hp gains (1.6% gains)
so using that logic if u were to spent $10,000 u should get 33.34hp.
In fact u get 50-55 hp. (best bang for ur buck mod, if u can afford it)

yes my logoic is flawed but so it urs bout upgrading.

anyways i think its stupid trying to bring in logic into something that isn't logical(tuning) to begin with. Tuning is addictive and you always want more.

Big up to Isuxel !!!!!

Last edited by ndk83; 02-08-10 at 08:03 PM.
Old 02-08-10, 08:13 PM
  #26  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,316
Received 3,962 Likes on 2,400 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ndk83
Boost isnt for everyone, some people want it really bad, others dont.

Tuning (b it rims and kits, or boost) is a passion, and in most cases logic and common sense kinda goes out the window,the money spent is usually never recouped.

Kurtz L-S-D:
u both have intakes and exhausts (money not well spent in the larger scheme of things)
u basically spent around $1500 for around 4-5 hp gains (1.6% gains)
so using that logic if u were to spent $10,000 u should get 33.34hp.
In fact u get 50-55 hp. (best bang for ur buck mod, if u can afford it)

yes my logoic is flawed but so it urs bout upgrading.

anyways i think its stupid trying to bring in logic into something that isn't logical(tuning) to begin with. Tuning is addictive and you always want more.

Big up to Isuxel !!!!!
Your premise is flawed. Cost of horsepower isn't linear and extrapolating from a relatively cheap item to something costing more doesn't often make any sense at all. Realistically we'd all be running small block Chevy V-8s if cheap, reliable power was the order of the day.

However - spending $8k on a supercharger for the ISx50 doesn't make good economic sense because the same money will easily take you to a higher trim level with a LOT more power from the factory - including a warranty. So, you'd be far better off just upgrading to a better model first. Once you've got the IS-F, then all the cost perspective goes sideways because you'll need to explore alternate brands (C63 AMG?) or even more expensive models which bring far greater insurance, registration, maintenance, and operating costs. My F is actually cheaper to insure than my 350...

If somebody wants to do it for the surprise factor, or just to be different, great. But most people are going to look at how much to I spend, what do I give up (engine warranty...), and what do I really get. Few will call a supercharger "worth it" after looking at all the real costs. Because it will only be a few, the aftermarket isn't going to devote a lot of time and effort to it. That's why we're where we are today - very few real performance options.
Old 02-08-10, 08:16 PM
  #27  
Kurtz
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Kurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ndk83
Boost isnt for everyone, some people want it really bad, others dont.

Tuning (b it rims and kits, or boost) is a passion, and in most cases logic and common sense kinda goes out the window,the money spent is usually never recouped.

Kurtz L-S-D:
u both have intakes and exhausts (money not well spent in the larger scheme of things)
u basically spent around $1500 for around 4-5 hp gains (1.6% gains)
so using that logic if u were to spent $10,000 u should get 33.34hp.
In fact u get 50-55 hp. (best bang for ur buck mod, if u can afford it)

yes my logoic is flawed but so it urs bout upgrading.

anyways i think its stupid trying to bring in logic into something that isn't logical(tuning) to begin with. Tuning is addictive and you always want more.

Big up to Isuxel !!!!!

You know what happens when ya assume, right? Your math sucks. No way in hell would I have paid MSRP for either performance part on my car, the value for gain sucks there (as it does with all the forced induction options).


I paid $200 for my intake... 5 rwhp based on every dyno I've seen for JoeZ/F-sport type intakes. That's $40 per hp.

I paid $400 for my Tanabe... 7 rwhp based on the dynos for that... $57 per hp.

Based on those numbers for $10,000 I expect between 175-250 horsepower. I think these kits fall a world short of that (but as Lance points out, this stuff isn't exactly linear)

Versus $10,000 for 55 ENGINE hp (~40-45 rwhp) for the TOMs supercharger... that's about 200-225 bucks per horsepower... 4-5 TIMES what I paid per hp.

The LMS kit at $6000 for 40 rwhp is a little better, at $150 per hp... still about triple what I paid for my gains (and honestly I was a little sick at how much my minor gains cost- I'm used to a lot better bang/buck on mods, hence why I've done so few to this car).


Again, versus if I'd spent $10,000 more for an IS-F for 108 more hp... or a mere $92.59 per hp... still expensive, but way cheaper than a supercharger for a lot more power....plus a better transmission and I keep the warranty too.
Old 02-08-10, 08:27 PM
  #28  
ChrISF
Lexus Champion
 
ChrISF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 2,902
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

<3 kurtz and his maths
Old 02-08-10, 08:43 PM
  #29  
projectdna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (56)
 
projectdna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,371
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

this obviously excludes the very few who are already running forced induction, and even then, those kits are relatively "one-off" (vs. mass-produced)...

but considering that the 2is has been out for four model years and yet we have yet to see any stateside options as far as forced induction is concerned, shouldn't that be an indication of whether forced induction is feasible and/or cost-effective?
Old 02-08-10, 09:08 PM
  #30  
ndk83
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
ndk83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DXB / AD
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
Your premise is flawed. Cost of horsepower isn't linear and extrapolating from a relatively cheap item to something costing more doesn't often make any sense at all. Realistically we'd all be running small block Chevy V-8s if cheap, reliable power was the order of the day.

However - spending $8k on a supercharger for the ISx50 doesn't make good economic sense because the same money will easily take you to a higher trim level with a LOT more power from the factory - including a warranty. So, you'd be far better off just upgrading to a better model first. Once you've got the IS-F, then all the cost perspective goes sideways because you'll need to explore alternate brands (C63 AMG?) or even more expensive models which bring far greater insurance, registration, maintenance, and operating costs. My F is actually cheaper to insure than my 350...

If somebody wants to do it for the surprise factor, or just to be different, great. But most people are going to look at how much to I spend, what do I give up (engine warranty...), and what do I really get. Few will call a supercharger "worth it" after looking at all the real costs. Because it will only be a few, the aftermarket isn't going to devote a lot of time and effort to it. That's why we're where we are today - very few real performance options.
Yea i know the logic I used is flawed, i even said it.
Spending any type of money on any mod doesnt make economic sense. There are a million better ways to spend ur money. Upgrading to a bigger faster car isnt one of them. Esp if ur a tuner, since ur running costs as u pointed out are higher (how btw is ur insurance on an F cheaper than an IS?) and prices of mods are relatively more expensive than the cheaper model.

people will tune any car you give them and at any price. how many F cars are supercharged? Ive read of atleast 2 or 3.
How many IS's are supercharged? i know of 5 (Isuxel, the guy with TOMS and butterflies, thata guy demik, another guy whose name i cant remember that was running the LMS, the chinese guy who build a custom roterex charger that i posted. And I know a handful that are interested out of the IS300 crowd. etc etc etc. There is satisfaction out of tuning that u cant get outta buying the next step up.

Sleeper cars ftw!!!!!!!!




Originally Posted by Kurtz
You know what happens when ya assume, right? Your math sucks. No way in hell would I have paid MSRP for either performance part on my car, the value for gain sucks there (as it does with all the forced induction options).


I paid $200 for my intake... 5 rwhp based on every dyno I've seen for JoeZ/F-sport type intakes. That's $40 per hp.

I paid $400 for my Tanabe... 7 rwhp based on the dynos for that... $57 per hp.

Based on those numbers for $10,000 I expect between 175-250 horsepower. I think these kits fall a world short of that (but as Lance points out, this stuff isn't exactly linear)

Versus $10,000 for 55 ENGINE hp (~40-45 rwhp) for the TOMs supercharger... that's about 200-225 bucks per horsepower... 4-5 TIMES what I paid per hp.

The LMS kit at $6000 for 40 rwhp is a little better, at $150 per hp... still about triple what I paid for my gains (and honestly I was a little sick at how much my minor gains cost- I'm used to a lot better bang/buck on mods, hence why I've done so few to this car).




Again, versus if I'd spent $10,000 more for an IS-F for 108 more hp... or a mere $92.59 per hp... still expensive, but way cheaper than a supercharger for a lot more power....plus a better transmission and I keep the warranty too.
Haha, but ur fallling into your own assumption trap. If u didnt pay MSRP for ur parts why would u assume you would for ur charger? And the gains of ur intake and exhaust at best wont b more than 5-7hp together ( i can show u other dynos, drag slips that either show either a loss of power, no power gains or marginally more power.)

We are all VERY disappointed with the gains that our cars got from performance parts. I bought my under the impression than the 1st gen would be a beast so therefore the 2nd gen would be aswell and although no parts were out at the time, that they would eventually. Never happened.


I cant convince u that spending 10k on a supercharger is worth it, nor do i want to. everyone can make up ur own financial decisions based on their situation.

But since there is nothing else, short of upgrading ur car, to make that much and more power then yea a supercharger is worth it under the tuner mentatlity. Again it depends on the users financial situation.

At the end of the day its all about ur personal satisfaction and ofcourse braging rights. One guy can say "i got an F", the other a "boosted350". Is it gonna change ur life because its 1 sec faster and a little bit cheaper? Not really. Personally however, id feel alot more satisfaction in something that I built not something i bought.

Both cars will command respect; the stock F from posers and the Boosted IS from enthusiasts.

So for the guys that are pushing our car limits


Quick Reply: New Supercharger for the 2GR-FSE engine from Toyota



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 PM.