IS200t tune
#4006
Driver School Candidate
#4007
Driver School Candidate
Still have not seen any customer dyno and/or any compare with other tune on the market Unless I missed an episode ;-)
Is it possible that new users submit independent dyno to have a real view on OVTuning. It is not a criticism but have noted that the results are not the same for the various ECU and created issues, Understand that this particular tuning seem tedious..
Is it possible that new users submit independent dyno to have a real view on OVTuning. It is not a criticism but have noted that the results are not the same for the various ECU and created issues, Understand that this particular tuning seem tedious..
#4008
Still have not seen any customer dyno and/or any compare with other tune on the market Unless I missed an episode ;-)
Is it possible that new users submit independent dyno to have a real view on OVTuning. It is not a criticism but have noted that the results are not the same for the various ECU and created issues, Understand that this particular tuning seem tedious..
Is it possible that new users submit independent dyno to have a real view on OVTuning. It is not a criticism but have noted that the results are not the same for the various ECU and created issues, Understand that this particular tuning seem tedious..
Every dyno result we have posted is an independent one. None of the results we have posted were on our dyno, they were done in independent cars at different shops.
And yes for some ECU versions it requires additional work.
We don't just disable a ton of check engine codes and max out tables like some other tunes out there.
Regardless, what we have coming I think everyone will enjoy and be able to do more than what we can just do on our own. A platform / open mapping that allows you guys to edit the tunes / tables / etc, creating your own tunes if you wish.
Last edited by OrangeVirus Tuning; 08-03-19 at 01:06 PM.
#4009
Every dyno result we have posted is an independent one. None of the results we have posted were on our dyno, they were done in independent cars at different shops.
And yes for some ECU versions it requires additional work.
We don't just disable a ton of check engine codes and max out tables like some other tunes out there.
Regardless, what we have coming I think everyone will enjoy and be able to do more than what we can just do on our own. A platform / open mapping that allows you guys to edit the tunes / tables / etc, creating your own tunes if you wish.
And yes for some ECU versions it requires additional work.
We don't just disable a ton of check engine codes and max out tables like some other tunes out there.
Regardless, what we have coming I think everyone will enjoy and be able to do more than what we can just do on our own. A platform / open mapping that allows you guys to edit the tunes / tables / etc, creating your own tunes if you wish.
#4010
our forum
forum.toyotacal.net is going to house all of our open info
#4011
#4012
Forum.toyotacal.net
as this one is a bit hard to track everything through all the replies. Information is too spread out.
We have several calibration IDs we will be updating this week for support. 2019+ files GS/RX
#4013
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: May 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Launch method?
I'm trying to get my best 0-60 time, couldn't get lower than 6.5s, pretty unconvincing for catless downpipe & OV tune.
What method do u guys do for launch?
I've been trying this:
-Sport mode
-Traction off
-Manual on first gear
-Floor brake
-Rev to ~2.2k
-Go!
What method do u guys do for launch?
I've been trying this:
-Sport mode
-Traction off
-Manual on first gear
-Floor brake
-Rev to ~2.2k
-Go!
#4014
Don't use Manual mode, and make sure traction is FULLY off, you have to hold the button for about 10 seconds
#4015
Lol. Its stock time...So the tune and downpipe did gave you anything.
#4016
Funny it seems so many people eager to attack our result, but all of our dyno results are posted by independent customers. We don't fake results.
ECU releases today *some already sent)
3A241
53P02
53Q90
24362
78075
78790
The following users liked this post:
SWXF (08-15-19)
#4017
If you use launch you get - 0.5 sec
So? 6.5 sec 0-100 = stock time with launch from 2.5k RPM
Dyno results don't interest end users. They want RACE LOGIC real results. They want 5 sec 0-100 with downpipe, chip, catback and cold air intake.
And now they are getting 6.5 sec...
Last edited by levchik77; 08-14-19 at 06:38 AM.
#4018
Stock without "launch" 0-100km is 7 sec
If you use launch you get - 0.5 sec
So? 6.5 sec 0-100 = stock time with launch from 2.5k RPM
Dyno results don't interest end users. They want RACE LOGIC real results. They want 5 sec 0-100 with downpipe, chip, catback and cold air intake.
And now they are getting 6.5 sec...
If you use launch you get - 0.5 sec
So? 6.5 sec 0-100 = stock time with launch from 2.5k RPM
Dyno results don't interest end users. They want RACE LOGIC real results. They want 5 sec 0-100 with downpipe, chip, catback and cold air intake.
And now they are getting 6.5 sec...
OK you can want that but doesn't mean it's going to ever be reality. Our tune makes more power but does not perform magic. you're asking 2 seconds faster 0-100 from downpipe and 30-40 horsepower?? 40 horsepower gain Includes the downpipe...
0-100...0-60mph depends on driver, mods, etc.
#4019
Stock without "launch" 0-100km is 7 sec
If you use launch you get - 0.5 sec
So? 6.5 sec 0-100 = stock time with launch from 2.5k RPM
Dyno results don't interest end users. They want RACE LOGIC real results. They want 5 sec 0-100 with downpipe, chip, catback and cold air intake.
And now they are getting 6.5 sec...
If you use launch you get - 0.5 sec
So? 6.5 sec 0-100 = stock time with launch from 2.5k RPM
Dyno results don't interest end users. They want RACE LOGIC real results. They want 5 sec 0-100 with downpipe, chip, catback and cold air intake.
And now they are getting 6.5 sec...
#4020
Hello,
We have an update that we are working on for the NX200T that we want everyone to be aware of. One person with the tune pointed it out. The mode settings for the NX200T (eco,normal,sport) are setup differently than the IS200T, in this case the tune will make the modes backwards (eco = fastest). For the NX200 ECUs we will have an updated version that corrects this.
We have an update that we are working on for the NX200T that we want everyone to be aware of. One person with the tune pointed it out. The mode settings for the NX200T (eco,normal,sport) are setup differently than the IS200T, in this case the tune will make the modes backwards (eco = fastest). For the NX200 ECUs we will have an updated version that corrects this.