First EVER IS350 Draggy Numbers
#16
damn a 1.4 40-60. thats 33% quicker than me at 2.1. i wonder whats your 0-60 and 1/4 times. i dont think a mid 12 sec 1/4 mile is possible with our cars if NA. i think a mid-high 12 sec is probably the best without forced induction, like a 12.7-12.8. i hope that i could my car at 300whp while keeping it NA but seeing redspencer's is350 getting 293whp i dont think its going to happen
My current FBO NA setup+ ported manifold and E85 custom tune get 330 WHP on a dynapack with TCF of 1.06 I don't know what kind of number it will get on dyno in USA.
#18
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
I can also vouch for the RR Racing tune being a fantastic upgrade and having solid reliability. I regularly take my IS350 to the race track and the tune is essential as it lets you stay in the lower gears for a longer period of time.
I have a neighbor who recently offered to let me borrow his GPS unit in order to obtain a 1/4 mile time using the draggy app. With you starting this thread, I think I'll have to take him up on that offer.
Regarding your 0-60 time, you can definitely do better with a fresh set of tires (particularly UHP summer tires). I don't have a draggy recorded 0-60 time but this is what I managed to pull during a warm summer night (I'm overdue with recording a pull during the cooler winter timeframe).
https://youtu.be/dUMV_-jDDp8
I have a neighbor who recently offered to let me borrow his GPS unit in order to obtain a 1/4 mile time using the draggy app. With you starting this thread, I think I'll have to take him up on that offer.
Regarding your 0-60 time, you can definitely do better with a fresh set of tires (particularly UHP summer tires). I don't have a draggy recorded 0-60 time but this is what I managed to pull during a warm summer night (I'm overdue with recording a pull during the cooler winter timeframe).
https://youtu.be/dUMV_-jDDp8
Keep in mind that for the most part 0-60 times are more about traction than power. You can only accelerate with the power you can put down without spinning.
I do think mid 12s are doable, I am probably high 12s as is if I get traction sorted out. The difference in our 40-60 would damn near put you in the 12s, I wouldn't be too surprised if there were another few tenths difference between us from 60-100mph.
I do think mid 12s are doable, I am probably high 12s as is if I get traction sorted out. The difference in our 40-60 would damn near put you in the 12s, I wouldn't be too surprised if there were another few tenths difference between us from 60-100mph.
I remember seeing a video of a stock isf racing a stock is350. The gearing on the is350 is much shorter and the is350 was actually ahead at the 1/8 mile mark but lost in the 1/4 mile mark. I was debating to switch over to a isf as my daily driver but decided against it because of that. With similar performance under 60mph, better gas mileage and better looks (IMO! ), I stayed with the is350 (now at 191k miles) and added some upgrades (also stayed with larger MP4S's).
#20
Driver School Candidate
The 2GR has a timing chain my man. No need to even worry about it unless you start hearing noise coming from there. Make sure you keep your oil changed and full and it will last as long as you want it to.
#21
Intermediate
Further poo-pooing on the 2JZ swap, a $1k junkyard LS, $4k swap kit (don't get me started on pricing...), and $3k Magnum 6sp makes a more practical swap, with more parts availability and power everywhere. Throw some nagasaki noisemakers into the mix, and you far surpass the JZ family's power capabilities. With a budget of $10k and a 2is, you can ostensibly have a sub-10 quarter mile car. Sub-9, if you've built LS-powered race cars before.
It's like all the guys in the Full Size Jeep community that can't get the idea of a 12v Cummins swap out of their head...you end up destroying the truck getting 6 cylinders in a line where you can more easily do more in less space with a different swap...
Edit: BTW, I'm using 3600lbs at a 8.9sec quarter to get ~1k whp. 1k whp isn't easy to do, but also isn't impossible, on a 6.0l stock iron block.
It's like all the guys in the Full Size Jeep community that can't get the idea of a 12v Cummins swap out of their head...you end up destroying the truck getting 6 cylinders in a line where you can more easily do more in less space with a different swap...
Edit: BTW, I'm using 3600lbs at a 8.9sec quarter to get ~1k whp. 1k whp isn't easy to do, but also isn't impossible, on a 6.0l stock iron block.
Last edited by Ultra4; 02-19-20 at 01:02 PM.
#22
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
Working too many hours and missed this...
I have no real numbers just a 2IS in the cold 40°F with new tires BFG G-Force Comp 2 A/S, and what was labeled 100 octane meth free. Add in the RR tune and you get a crappy video....
Lexus IS-350 0-80 mph
No edits. If someone can see time, it seems to be doing ok.
I have no real numbers just a 2IS in the cold 40°F with new tires BFG G-Force Comp 2 A/S, and what was labeled 100 octane meth free. Add in the RR tune and you get a crappy video....
Lexus IS-350 0-80 mph
The following users liked this post:
Rotorboy21 (02-19-20)
#23
Driver School Candidate
Further poo-pooing on the 2JZ swap, a $1k junkyard LS, $4k swap kit (don't get me started on pricing...), and $3k Magnum 6sp makes a more practical swap, with more parts availability and power everywhere. Throw some nagasaki noisemakers into the mix, and you far surpass the JZ family's power capabilities. With a budget of $10k and a 2is, you can ostensibly have a sub-10 quarter mile car. Sub-9, if you've built LS-powered race cars before.
It's like all the guys in the Full Size Jeep community that can't get the idea of a 12v Cummins swap out of their head...you end up destroying the truck getting 6 cylinders in a line where you can more easily do more in less space with a different swap...
Edit: BTW, I'm using 3600lbs at a 8.9sec quarter to get ~1k whp. 1k whp isn't easy to do, but also isn't impossible, on a 6.0l stock iron block.
It's like all the guys in the Full Size Jeep community that can't get the idea of a 12v Cummins swap out of their head...you end up destroying the truck getting 6 cylinders in a line where you can more easily do more in less space with a different swap...
Edit: BTW, I'm using 3600lbs at a 8.9sec quarter to get ~1k whp. 1k whp isn't easy to do, but also isn't impossible, on a 6.0l stock iron block.
Bolting a JZ to a CD009 is every bit as good as a 6.0 to a T56 and costs relatively the same.
swap kits are all gonna be about the same.
You also won’t surpass any JZ family power numbers without building the bottom end of the LS. Regardless of what you tubers tell you the junkyard engine was never meant to make big numbers and will fail eventually. Both JZ and LS motors HAVE to be built to handle power over ~800 whp or you’re gonna have a bad time.
Most people want a JZ to keep it Toyota. Personally I don’t care, but we really need to kill this trend of LS swapping everything because it’s not the end all be all.
#25
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
Alright. While LS swaps are some of the cheaper swaps 2JZ swaps are just as cheap if you know what you’re doing. Get a $500 JZ out of an IS300, put $400 into the bottom end with GTE internals and new gaskets, bearingsc etc and you have a $900 800 who capable engine that’s essentially new and you know it’s history... or, get an SC300 or early GS300 engine for the same price and you have the bottom end already.
Bolting a JZ to a CD009 is every bit as good as a 6.0 to a T56 and costs relatively the same.
swap kits are all gonna be about the same.
You also won’t surpass any JZ family power numbers without building the bottom end of the LS. Regardless of what you tubers tell you the junkyard engine was never meant to make big numbers and will fail eventually. Both JZ and LS motors HAVE to be built to handle power over ~800 whp or you’re gonna have a bad time.
Most people want a JZ to keep it Toyota. Personally I don’t care, but we really need to kill this trend of LS swapping everything because it’s not the end all be all.
Bolting a JZ to a CD009 is every bit as good as a 6.0 to a T56 and costs relatively the same.
swap kits are all gonna be about the same.
You also won’t surpass any JZ family power numbers without building the bottom end of the LS. Regardless of what you tubers tell you the junkyard engine was never meant to make big numbers and will fail eventually. Both JZ and LS motors HAVE to be built to handle power over ~800 whp or you’re gonna have a bad time.
Most people want a JZ to keep it Toyota. Personally I don’t care, but we really need to kill this trend of LS swapping everything because it’s not the end all be all.
Just to do something different! I enjoyed the V8 days and mainly just miss the sound! And Torque's! Not cost effective but different.
#26
Driver School Candidate
I don’t blame you lol. My Z06 was fun to drive but that thing couldn’t even keep 325s from spinning lol. Too much torque kills the experience imo. Balanced is the way to be!
#27
Intermediate
Alright. While LS swaps are some of the cheaper swaps 2JZ swaps are just as cheap if you know what you’re doing. Get a $500 JZ out of an IS300, put $400 into the bottom end with GTE internals and new gaskets, bearingsc etc and you have a $900 800 who capable engine that’s essentially new and you know it’s history... or, get an SC300 or early GS300 engine for the same price and you have the bottom end already.
Bolting a JZ to a CD009 is every bit as good as a 6.0 to a T56 and costs relatively the same.
swap kits are all gonna be about the same.
You also won’t surpass any JZ family power numbers without building the bottom end of the LS. Regardless of what you tubers tell you the junkyard engine was never meant to make big numbers and will fail eventually. Both JZ and LS motors HAVE to be built to handle power over ~800 whp or you’re gonna have a bad time.
Most people want a JZ to keep it Toyota. Personally I don’t care, but we really need to kill this trend of LS swapping everything because it’s not the end all be all.
Bolting a JZ to a CD009 is every bit as good as a 6.0 to a T56 and costs relatively the same.
swap kits are all gonna be about the same.
You also won’t surpass any JZ family power numbers without building the bottom end of the LS. Regardless of what you tubers tell you the junkyard engine was never meant to make big numbers and will fail eventually. Both JZ and LS motors HAVE to be built to handle power over ~800 whp or you’re gonna have a bad time.
Most people want a JZ to keep it Toyota. Personally I don’t care, but we really need to kill this trend of LS swapping everything because it’s not the end all be all.
Meanwhile, we had a coworker who was effectively the pit boss for a LS-swapped Fox body that was chasing 5 second passes in the 1/8th and changing out 5.3l bottom ends more often than he changed socks. The big joke was that the Fox had more miles down the track than the Supra ever will under it's own power, and he was spending more on race fuel than he was on 5.3l blocks.
#28
Driver School Candidate
I have a really bad taste in my mouth from the JZ family because one of my buddies with a '95 Mk.4 hardtop has spent more than a quarter mil trying to get 1k whp to go down the strip, and yeah, he's got a kill video of a Veyron and some cool Insta posts, but he's driven it maybe a total of 10 hours in the 7 years he's had it. The rest of the time he's owned it, it's just been a money pit.
Meanwhile, we had a coworker who was effectively the pit boss for a LS-swapped Fox body that was chasing 5 second passes in the 1/8th and changing out 5.3l bottom ends more often than he changed socks. The big joke was that the Fox had more miles down the track than the Supra ever will under it's own power, and he was spending more on race fuel than he was on 5.3l blocks.
Meanwhile, we had a coworker who was effectively the pit boss for a LS-swapped Fox body that was chasing 5 second passes in the 1/8th and changing out 5.3l bottom ends more often than he changed socks. The big joke was that the Fox had more miles down the track than the Supra ever will under it's own power, and he was spending more on race fuel than he was on 5.3l blocks.
#29
OG Member
iTrader: (1)
I did my very first 1/4 mile run in my IS350 and used Dragy to get the times GPS certified. It's definitely a different experience from doing my usual cornering adventures but since I like accumulating data and stats on this car, I figure I'd see what this car can do in the 1/4 mile with my mods.
I only had the chance to do one attempt at a 1/4 mile and while there's still room for improvement, I think I did okay for being a drag noob. Rear tire PSI was at 34, brake torque was around 1200-1500 RPMs, and my upshift timing was fairly close to being at redline before each shift.
My biggest bummer of the single run I did was that my certified time was literally 13.00 seconds! If I was 0.01 seconds quicker, it would have officially made the IS350 a 12 second car. I'm hoping that with more experience and more attempts, I'll break into the 12s.
Here's an embedded video of my run:
Here's my recorded times for my 0-60, 1/8 mile, and 1/4 mile times:
0-60 (4.6sec / 4.39sec w 1ft rollout), 40-60 (1.88sec):
1/4 mile time (13.00sec) & 1/8 mile time (8.39sec), 0-100mph (11.48sec):
I only had the chance to do one attempt at a 1/4 mile and while there's still room for improvement, I think I did okay for being a drag noob. Rear tire PSI was at 34, brake torque was around 1200-1500 RPMs, and my upshift timing was fairly close to being at redline before each shift.
My biggest bummer of the single run I did was that my certified time was literally 13.00 seconds! If I was 0.01 seconds quicker, it would have officially made the IS350 a 12 second car. I'm hoping that with more experience and more attempts, I'll break into the 12s.
Here's an embedded video of my run:
Here's my recorded times for my 0-60, 1/8 mile, and 1/4 mile times:
0-60 (4.6sec / 4.39sec w 1ft rollout), 40-60 (1.88sec):
1/4 mile time (13.00sec) & 1/8 mile time (8.39sec), 0-100mph (11.48sec):
Last edited by redspencer; 02-22-20 at 11:18 AM.
The following users liked this post:
MikeFig82 (02-25-20)
#30
Intermediate
iTrader: (1)
I did my very first 1/4 mile run in my IS350 and used Dragy to get the times GPS certified. It's definitely a different experience from doing my usual cornering adventures but since I like accumulating data and stats on this car, I figure I'd see what this car can do in the 1/4 mile with my mods.
I only had the chance to do one attempt at a 1/4 mile and while there's still room for improvement, I think I did okay for being a drag noob. Rear tire PSI was at 34, brake torque was around 1200-1500 RPMs, and my upshift timing was fairly close to being at redline before each shift.
My biggest bummer of the single run I did was that my certified time was literally 13.00 seconds! If I was 0.01 seconds quicker, it would have officially made the IS350 a 12 second car. I'm hoping that with more experience and more attempts, I'll break into the 12s.
Here's an embedded video of my run:
https://youtu.be/-Iy2-8RrIS0
Here's my recorded times for my 0-60, 1/8 mile, and 1/4 mile times:
0-60 (4.63sec), 40-60 (1.88sec):
1/4 mile time (13.00sec) & 1/8 mile time (8.39sec), 0-100mph (11.48sec):
I only had the chance to do one attempt at a 1/4 mile and while there's still room for improvement, I think I did okay for being a drag noob. Rear tire PSI was at 34, brake torque was around 1200-1500 RPMs, and my upshift timing was fairly close to being at redline before each shift.
My biggest bummer of the single run I did was that my certified time was literally 13.00 seconds! If I was 0.01 seconds quicker, it would have officially made the IS350 a 12 second car. I'm hoping that with more experience and more attempts, I'll break into the 12s.
Here's an embedded video of my run:
https://youtu.be/-Iy2-8RrIS0
Here's my recorded times for my 0-60, 1/8 mile, and 1/4 mile times:
0-60 (4.63sec), 40-60 (1.88sec):
1/4 mile time (13.00sec) & 1/8 mile time (8.39sec), 0-100mph (11.48sec):