RC - 1st Gen (2015-present) Discussion about the new Lexus RC model

Official Lexus RC thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-13, 01:42 PM
  #616  
ydooby
Lexus Champion
 
ydooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
well, cant have it both ways, either it matters or not... people here were saying that it doesnt matter how light the GS-F is, that it has to have 550hp... so I guess its the same for M3 :-).
No one said the GS-F has to have 550hp, but most agree that it needs to have at least 500hp to be considered in the same realm as its competition--that's just how the segment is. The C-segment super sedans on the other hand are still in the realm of 41x to 450hp right now, so the new M3 having 42x hp is still fine for the segment.
Old 09-24-13, 02:49 PM
  #617  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,923
Received 161 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ydooby
No one said the GS-F has to have 550hp, but most agree that it needs to have at least 500hp to be considered in the same realm as its competition--that's just how the segment is. The C-segment super sedans on the other hand are still in the realm of 41x to 450hp right now, so the new M3 having 42x hp is still fine for the segment.
plenty of people here said that it has to have hp numbers and that actual performance does not matter that much.

So if for M3, +-50hp doesnt matter, why should it matter for GS-F?

In reality, it matters for both anyway. People care about the numbers when they pay the price.
Old 09-24-13, 03:46 PM
  #618  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 88 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xioix
That shouldn't be a problem. I don't remember hearing about tuned Supras having overheating issues.
Difference being that Toyota made the Supra engine. BMW made the N54 3L turbo in the 2010 335i that had fuel pump failures triggering a mass recall.
Old 09-24-13, 04:04 PM
  #619  
Lexuslvr91
Lead Lap
 
Lexuslvr91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
plenty of people here said that it has to have hp numbers and that actual performance does not matter that much.

So if for M3, +-50hp doesnt matter, why should it matter for GS-F?

In reality, it matters for both anyway. People care about the numbers when they pay the price.
According to the article posted on the upcoming M4 it will have 424 hp but will weigh 700 lbs less than the current C63 AMG and 500 lbs less than the current IS-F. It also has the benefit of a much higher torque curve relative to a naturally aspirated engine producing similar power. So the M4 will have a very low power to weight ratio. The GS-F would need to weigh 3440 lbs to match the power to weight ratio of the BMW M5 given this 450 hp rumor.
Old 09-24-13, 04:45 PM
  #620  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,923
Received 161 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lexuslvr91
According to the article posted on the upcoming M4 it will have 424 hp but will weigh 700 lbs less than the current C63 AMG and 500 lbs less than the current IS-F. It also has the benefit of a much higher torque curve relative to a naturally aspirated engine producing similar power. So the M4 will have a very low power to weight ratio. The GS-F would need to weigh 3440 lbs to match the power to weight ratio of the BMW M5 given this 450 hp rumor.
so if GS-F weights 3500lbs with 465hp engine, what happens then?

Also, didnt the IS-F have a lot more torque compared to M3 ? Those torque curves vs IS-F wont look like vs old M3. It seems like IS-F had 30% more torque already.

If Lexus manages to keep the weight down, and they seem to be doing well with GS so far, and up the power of V8, it will be quite comparable to M3 and possibly M5.
Old 09-24-13, 05:16 PM
  #621  
ydooby
Lexus Champion
 
ydooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
plenty of people here said that it has to have hp numbers and that actual performance does not matter that much.

So if for M3, +-50hp doesnt matter, why should it matter for GS-F?

In reality, it matters for both anyway. People care about the numbers when they pay the price.
It's a psychological thing. It's not about +-50hp, but about being in the "500's" realm. The first digit matters, much like how people like to say a car must have at least a "sub-4-second" 0-60mph acceleration time to be called a supercar. The number "4" here means very little in math and stats, but is actually a significant psychological barrier for people to identify a car with. It's a convenient and therefore important way for people to perceive to which segment a car belongs. If the GS-F has horsepower only in the "400's", then it'll be next to impossible to market the car as a peer to the likes of the M5, E63 and RS6, all of which have horsepower in the "500's". That's just how the market works.

Last edited by ydooby; 09-24-13 at 06:20 PM.
Old 09-24-13, 05:34 PM
  #622  
Vladi
Pole Position
 
Vladi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lexuslvr91
According to the article posted on the upcoming M4 it will have 424 hp but will weigh 700 lbs less than the current C63 AMG and 500 lbs less than the current IS-F. It also has the benefit of a much higher torque curve relative to a naturally aspirated engine producing similar power. So the M4 will have a very low power to weight ratio. The GS-F would need to weigh 3440 lbs to match the power to weight ratio of the BMW M5 given this 450 hp rumor.
Do you really believe that M4 will weight under 3300lb in base spec trim priced at 70k?

It might weight that much with some insane strip down club racer package or if its base msrp will be set around 100k price range.
Old 09-24-13, 11:35 PM
  #623  
TF109B
Lexus Champion
 
TF109B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,266
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Motortrend said that was dry weight, of the European model. I doubt it'll be any less than 3450lbs. Don't forget the rumors of the "carbon fiber" package on the RC. Will be interesting to see the weight of that.
Old 09-25-13, 03:56 AM
  #624  
zema
Driver
 
zema's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default





Source: http://lexusenthusiast.com/2013/09/2...ook-like-this/
Old 09-25-13, 06:12 AM
  #625  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,923
Received 161 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

i like those pics a lot better than old ones... that looks good, including headlights.
Old 09-25-13, 08:57 AM
  #626  
edgeucated
Pole Position
iTrader: (4)
 
edgeucated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: socal
Posts: 3,131
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
i like those pics a lot better than old ones... that looks good, including headlights.
same here. The lines look softer, more finesse. Still wouldn't say pretty though, but its better.

Those exhausts diffusers can't be the real thing though, the older ISF oval tips look much better than small circular ones
Old 09-25-13, 10:32 AM
  #627  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by natnut
One wonders how a high boost highly stressed tri-turbo engine (3L to generate 425+hp) would hold up under repeated laps of a track without overheating. The Lexus RC-F normal aspirated V8 almost certainly will be bulletproof under those conditions considering that the Lexus LFA V10 can run repeated laps with its oil temp not budging an inch.
Just a note- it's not a tri-turbo. It's also got an intense cooling system. They're not messing around.

Originally Posted by natnut
Difference being that Toyota made the Supra engine. BMW made the N54 3L turbo in the 2010 335i that had fuel pump failures triggering a mass recall.
Fuel pump does not equal cooling issues. They've done just fine cooling their twin turbo motors in the past, this one should be no different.
Old 09-25-13, 11:57 AM
  #628  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,058
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

yea you need a mean cooling system to cool 19 psi of boost. 3300# is way too optimistic, more like 3500. 1 Series can barely keep it near 3300#
Old 09-25-13, 10:46 PM
  #629  
madfast
Driver
 
madfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TF109B
Motortrend said that was dry weight, of the European model. I doubt it'll be any less than 3450lbs. Don't forget the rumors of the "carbon fiber" package on the RC. Will be interesting to see the weight of that.
on the M4 the CF roof is said to save 13 lbs and CF trunk saves 11 lbs. on the E92 the CF roof was said to save 11 lbs vs a steel roof. CF is mainly for bling and bragging rights. an aluminum roof/hood/trunk is all you really need. lets hope lexus keeps the price reasonable by staying away from CF and goes with aluminum...
Old 09-26-13, 03:44 AM
  #630  
ydooby
Lexus Champion
 
ydooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madfast
on the M4 the CF roof is said to save 13 lbs and CF trunk saves 11 lbs. on the E92 the CF roof was said to save 11 lbs vs a steel roof. CF is mainly for bling and bragging rights. an aluminum roof/hood/trunk is all you really need. lets hope lexus keeps the price reasonable by staying away from CF and goes with aluminum...
Not just for bling, but the M4 actually has a CF drive shaft. Now that's something you usually see only on an exotic.


Quick Reply: Official Lexus RC thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:17 PM.