RC - 1st Gen (2015-present) Discussion about the new Lexus RC model

Torn between the RC-200t vs RC-350.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-16, 02:03 PM
  #16  
shadow1118
Intermediate
 
shadow1118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: FL
Posts: 498
Received 43 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
Sure if you like a slow sports coupe. Kinda defeats the purpose of a sporty car when you're slower than a mid trim civic.
that is literally not true at all , from 0-60 they're both about 6.5 seconds. the only civic that will be better will be the type r , and may actually beat the rc 350 in a race, honestly if the type r were to have been sold in the us when i was in the market for a new car i would of for sure test drove it , maybe bought it

Last edited by shadow1118; 05-21-16 at 02:10 PM.
Old 05-21-16, 03:38 PM
  #17  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shadow1118
that is literally not true at all , from 0-60 they're both about 6.5 seconds. the only civic that will be better will be the type r , and may actually beat the rc 350 in a race, honestly if the type r were to have been sold in the us when i was in the market for a new car i would of for sure test drove it , maybe bought it
The is200t is around 6.9 and weighs 150 lbs lighter. Most publications have the RC at 7.2. The mid trim civic with the 1.5 turbo does it around mid 6. I agree that the civic is slow. Anything in the 6 something range is slow.
Old 05-21-16, 03:45 PM
  #18  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
The is200t is around 6.9 and weighs 150 lbs lighter. Most publications have the RC at 7.2. The mid trim civic with the 1.5 turbo does it around mid 6. I agree that the civic is slow. Anything in the 6 something range is slow.
http://www.automobilemag.com/news/20...00-awd-models/

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/12/18/2...k-spin-review/

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...bo-test-review

Just for reference.

Last edited by EZZ; 05-21-16 at 03:49 PM.
Old 05-21-16, 07:16 PM
  #19  
shadow1118
Intermediate
 
shadow1118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: FL
Posts: 498
Received 43 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
The is200t is around 6.9 and weighs 150 lbs lighter. Most publications have the RC at 7.2. The mid trim civic with the 1.5 turbo does it around mid 6. I agree that the civic is slow. Anything in the 6 something range is slow.
not to keep debating, but the rc200t does 0-60 in 6.5 seconds for me, 6.3 if i brake torque , I already tested this. all in sport + using paddle shifters. you just have to know how to drive. i think they're about the same, but the rc looks 200000000000x better than the regular civic, the 2.0t is plenty fast enough for street driving. no matter what you say your still comparing a civic to the freaking lexus rc, nothing you say will make the car seem bad. The rc is great in every engine option no matter , plus I'm banking these turbos will hit 300k miles easy which is insane bro if you think about it, its all about the engineering, the lexus turbo is in house built, is the honda turbo? probably not. sorry kid
also i think even from rolling from like 2nd gear the lexus rc200t will always smoke the civic (not type r)
Old 05-21-16, 07:46 PM
  #20  
ZAM
Pole Position
 
ZAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 214
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Why is a civic even in this debate??? Lexus claims a 0-60 for the 350 in 5.6s. Your references are going to give you different numbers because of different factors, like altitude. To go back to the main topic of this thread: Go with the 200t if you don't care too much about performance and if you want better mpg. I've driven the new CTS in the 2.0l turbo engine trim and it has plenty of horsepower for the streets. I haven't driven the 2.0l turbo RC, but i'm pretty sure you will be fine with normal driving. Test drive both to find out which one you prefer.
Old 05-21-16, 10:32 PM
  #21  
lexual_rc
Moderator
 
lexual_rc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 604
Received 73 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZAM
Why is a civic even in this debate??? Lexus claims a 0-60 for the 350 in 5.6s. Your references are going to give you different numbers because of different factors, like altitude. To go back to the main topic of this thread: Go with the 200t if you don't care too much about performance and if you want better mpg. I've driven the new CTS in the 2.0l turbo engine trim and it has plenty of horsepower for the streets. I haven't driven the 2.0l turbo RC, but i'm pretty sure you will be fine with normal driving. Test drive both to find out which one you prefer.
Hahah I was just thinking the same thing....really how does any lexus of any kind from like 2000 and up compare to any civic. (Non type r/ si) Fail!!!
Old 06-14-24, 06:29 PM
  #22  
Teez1974
1st Gear
 
Teez1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: California
Posts: 1
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Rc 200t vs 300/350

Originally Posted by lexual_rc
My question is do you guys the think the 200t has a more up-gradable platform...like a subaru or something? Like it may be modded (turbo and all) to become really fast?

I know there really isn't going to be anything like that for the 350 due to its high compression ratio...but was curious about this 200t.
I'd go with the 200t only becuase the engine modes /tubro upgrade would be easier and cheaper and you can get more power at the end of the day. But if your keeping it stock and want power I'd go 350
Old 06-14-24, 08:32 PM
  #23  
KennyFSU
Instructor
 
KennyFSU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: FL
Posts: 883
Received 336 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Life's too short; get the 350.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mdme
RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022)
169
02-05-24 08:54 AM
sdiver68
IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present)
27
06-18-16 08:28 AM
Arimann
NX - 1st Gen (2015-2021)
3
07-01-15 11:26 PM
Sherwink
RC - 1st Gen (2015-present)
19
03-26-15 12:43 PM
bp044
IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present)
63
01-23-14 06:43 AM



Quick Reply: Torn between the RC-200t vs RC-350.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:49 PM.