RC-F vs. C63
04-24-14, 05:16 PM
#16
Not much official info available on the RC yet. Car has not been tested by any of the mags yet that I know of. HP anywhere from 460 to 480 has been mentioned. Price for a base has been rumored anywhere from high 60's to mid 70's for a base model and another 10 grand or so for the carbon option model. One thing we do know is there is lots of optimism here about the RC being quite a car. November is the best guess for deliveries.
04-24-14, 05:18 PM
#17
04-24-14, 05:48 PM
#18
04-28-14, 06:54 AM
#19
04-28-14, 04:44 PM
#20
05-02-14, 07:11 PM
#22
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NV
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you're picking the best time for the IS F, then you also need to pick the best time for the C63, which has been tested as low as 3.7. That being said, they are both very fast, great handling cars that are better than 99.9% of the other cars on the road, so you can't go wrong with either! (I owned an IS F and currently have a C63 Coupe.)
05-15-14, 10:55 PM
#23
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This would be my thought:
C63: More powerful by about 20 - 30 hp (twin turbo V8), quicker in a straight line, heavier by a 200 - 300 lbs, Mercedes brand name
RC-F: Better handling, better driving dynamics, more durable and better quality, exclusivity and more exciting to drive on twisty roads.
C63: More powerful by about 20 - 30 hp (twin turbo V8), quicker in a straight line, heavier by a 200 - 300 lbs, Mercedes brand name
RC-F: Better handling, better driving dynamics, more durable and better quality, exclusivity and more exciting to drive on twisty roads.
05-15-14, 11:06 PM
#25
Lexus Test Driver
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
