RC F (2015-present) Discussion topics related to the RC F model

Official UK stats for the RC-F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-14 | 10:57 AM
  #16  
TimboIS's Avatar
TimboIS
Liquid Bra Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 139
From: ƒ(x)
Default

Originally Posted by 05RollaXRS
Agreed.
I told you it wouldn't "spec" out as a sub-4s car.
Old 08-13-14 | 11:40 AM
  #17  
ISF001's Avatar
ISF001
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 3
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by FinaLpeace
Lol it needs more power...... It's only about 1 second faster than the IS350 which is not great at all...... Why cant Lexus create something affordable in the 3 seconds range like the Germans can? Mercedes didn't need "turbos" to get their AMG models into 3 seconds range. Honestly though most buyers out there look for the 0-60 numbers when they buy a car at this price. Well seeing the numbers made me a bit happy that I didn't wait and had gotten the IS350 F Sport . 1 second faster isn't going to feel much of a difference when driving. Well that said, keep in mind that Lexus main focus on the RCF was "fun to drive" and not a M4 or M3 killer in speed. Of course what I said was based on every day driving on legal road whereas on track the RCF is probably way faster than the IS350 and maybe the M4
Are you actually comparing the 5.5 sec 2015 IS 350 F-Sport to the RC F?

I suggest taking two aspirin and sleeping it off...
Old 08-13-14 | 11:42 AM
  #18  
ISF001's Avatar
ISF001
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 3
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by TimboIS
I told you it wouldn't "spec" out as a sub-4s car.
Maybe...we'll see what the test drivers are able to do with the new beast...and it IS a beast.
Old 08-13-14 | 11:51 AM
  #19  
05RollaXRS's Avatar
05RollaXRS
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 2,512
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Originally Posted by ISF001
Are you actually comparing the 5.5 sec 2015 IS 350 F-Sport to the RC F?

I suggest taking two aspirin and sleeping it off...
Actually, the 0 - 100 km/h for the official IS350 is more like 5.7 seconds.
Old 08-13-14 | 04:19 PM
  #20  
redspencer's Avatar
redspencer
OG Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 545
From: Central FL
Default

The recently released UK specs fall in line with the engine specs from the Gran Turismo 6 oil change trick I discovered using the IS-F CCS-R a few months back

Old 08-13-14 | 05:47 PM
  #21  
primecut's Avatar
primecut
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Not enough power and too much weight. I was hoping they'd blow the M4 out of the water with the power/weight ratio, otherwise it needed to be lighter. Weight wasn't an option and now the power is not that great either. I just don't see this being a road course monster or a better overall car. Sigh.

Now they really need to price this closer to the M4 and not start at 70k (I know I know... BMW requires more packages, add-ons, etc.)

This is all a bit disappointing =/
Old 08-13-14 | 06:06 PM
  #22  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,060
Likes: 51
From: Houston, Texas
Default

sounds like a vette is more up your alley. Price and weight are still unknown. RCF will kill the ISF in performance, last ISF already matched the E9X M3

Last edited by 4TehNguyen; 08-13-14 at 06:15 PM.
Old 08-13-14 | 06:21 PM
  #23  
ISF001's Avatar
ISF001
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 3
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
sounds like a vette is more up your alley. RCF will kill the ISF in performance, last ISF already matched the E9X M3
Guys,

It's not going to be everything to everyone. Sure, we all want 600 HP, 2-3 sec performance, a 200-mph top end...it's not going to happen for $83,000--what I expect the carbon model to sell for.

The LFA, for all of its cost, is not the fastest in its class...and there are faster cars for less money, but no better Supercar for overall performance and reliability.

Pick your battles based on your pocketbooks and must-haves. A 4-second car with a 170 top end is plenty for this guy from PA. . I love my ISF, but a bit more in the way of low-end acceleration, handling improvements, and over-the-top styling goes quite far with me.

This car may still break into the high 3s...again, let's see what tricks it will do and then voice more substantiated opinions.

And forget about matching the M4 with a lower price. This is a far superior car with respect to manufacturing and reliability. It's a Lexus and not a BMW--thank God!

Last edited by ISF001; 08-13-14 at 06:26 PM.
Old 08-13-14 | 06:40 PM
  #24  
Nights's Avatar
Nights
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: NSW, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by ISF001
I think a 3.9 is possible...under the right conditions. We'll see soon enough.

Regardless, I want the superior OVERALL high-performance car, and the M4 IS NOT the one: 1-2 tenths of a second in 0-60 really are of little value in my world. I know the RCF engine will run and run, and that I do not have to worry about blowing the turbos, DCT, and rear.
Definitely hard to enjoy the car if it's in for repairs all the time
Old 08-13-14 | 06:45 PM
  #25  
ISF001's Avatar
ISF001
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,083
Likes: 3
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by Nights
Definitely hard to enjoy the car if it's in for repairs all the time
My early "M" had a permanent bay at BMW. What a frickin nightmare! Never again for this guy.
Old 08-13-14 | 07:26 PM
  #26  
Isfast's Avatar
Isfast
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 833
Likes: 37
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by ISF001
Guys,

It's not going to be everything to everyone. Sure, we all want 600 HP, 2-3 sec performance, a 200-mph top end...it's not going to happen for $83,000--what I expect the carbon model to sell for.

The LFA, for all of its cost, is not the fastest in its class...and there are faster cars for less money, but no better Supercar for overall performance and reliability.

Pick your battles based on your pocketbooks and must-haves. A 4-second car with a 170 top end is plenty for this guy from PA. . I love my ISF, but a bit more in the way of low-end acceleration, handling improvements, and over-the-top styling goes quite far with me.

This car may still break into the high 3s...again, let's see what tricks it will do and then voice more substantiated opinions.

And forget about matching the M4 with a lower price. This is a far superior car with respect to manufacturing and reliability. It's a Lexus and not a BMW--thank God!
^ +100. For those who are disappointed with the price and 0-60 times, the Vette is a great car!!
Old 08-13-14 | 07:36 PM
  #27  
05RollaXRS's Avatar
05RollaXRS
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 2,512
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Originally Posted by Isfast
^ +100. For those who are disappointed with the price and 0-60 times, the Vette is a great car!!
The Corvette does the 1/4 mile in 12.3 - 12.5 seconds in road tests. It is actually slower in a straight line than most sport sedans of today. Most probably because of the manual transmission.

If 0-60 mph is the biggest concern for traffic light to traffic light then buy an AWD car with a turbo on it.
Old 08-13-14 | 09:12 PM
  #28  
rgr555's Avatar
rgr555
Rookie
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

83k i think i rather have a Porsche Cayenne S
Old 08-13-14 | 09:22 PM
  #29  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,060
Likes: 51
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by rgr555
83k i think i rather have a Porsche Cayenne S
i hear there are rumors on the....Internet
Old 08-13-14 | 10:46 PM
  #30  
05RollaXRS's Avatar
05RollaXRS
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 2,512
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Originally Posted by rgr555
83k i think i rather have a Porsche Cayenne S
What does an SUV have to do with the RC-F?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:02 AM.