RC F (2015-present) Discussion topics related to the RC F model

Sorry, But your Remote Start Won't Work

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-17, 01:13 PM
  #61  
Davew77
Lead Lap
 
Davew77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 750
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danielTRLK
The idling reduces the amount of lubrication overall, resulting in additional FD. that FD in return breaks down the oil which in turn eats bearings. Your correct, a few of my police and fire departments blow engines from idling. It's why Ford is finally introducing their taurus and explorer in hybrid formats. Idling is just not good, and your health takes a hit from the fumes getting into the cabin. It's often why in industial applications they don't use miles but rather hours.
Which is why the manufacturer has shorter oil change intervals for vehicles which fall under special circumstances, such as excessive idle times. This will compensate for the shorter oil life.

I will concede that excessive idling (30%+ of the engine running time) could be detrimental to an engine in the long term (over 150k miles) if the oil is not changed at the correct interval for the engine usage. But using a remote start every day and letting the car idle for 10 minutes during warm up is not going to have a big effect on the average car within the first 200k miles. Not enough for the average person to be worried about it. If they are worried about it then they should change their oil sooner.
Old 04-19-17, 01:42 PM
  #62  
danielTRLK
Lead Lap
 
danielTRLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 435
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Maybe I didn't explain well. When you idle, you don't get oil up top. If you don't get oil pressure up top, you get wear from lack of lubrication and then you get wear in the lower end because your oil is diluted. The wear uptop has nothing to do with changing the oil. 10 minutes is nuts, too long, the Lexus blows heat in a few minutes or A/C at worst. Again you can probably run to 200K but you're not going to preserve that power, you end up getting soot everywhere as well and a bunch of nasty bad stuff. It's about performance for me. what is your definition of big effect? for everyone is different, a loss of 70 horsepower for some would be big, for some it wouldn't big. All depends on what you want
Old 04-19-17, 01:45 PM
  #63  
Davew77
Lead Lap
 
Davew77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 750
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

I think you are exaggerating the problem. I had a 350z that had an aftermarket turbo that was still doing 1/4 mile runs at 100k miles. My times did not decrease over time and it idled a LOT! It would be idling for 30 minutes sometimes while waiting to get my run in. A 70 hp decrease would have been a noticeable effect on my 1/4 mile times. It had a lot more than 467 hp... at the wheels even.
Old 04-19-17, 01:54 PM
  #64  
danielTRLK
Lead Lap
 
danielTRLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 435
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

70 HP is not that much on a 467HP engine after 200,000 miles. That's a 15% power loss.
Old 04-19-17, 02:26 PM
  #65  
Davew77
Lead Lap
 
Davew77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 750
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Well, all I can say is... if it was a real problem, then why after all of these years of automobiles being driven have they not implemented a better oil pump that can pump adequate oil to the engine at idle? How do you know for certain that they haven't already?

It's a real simple solution to what you consider to be a major problem.
Old 04-19-17, 02:29 PM
  #66  
mjeds
Lexus Champion
 
mjeds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 2,424
Received 188 Likes on 145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Davew77
Well, all I can say is... if it was a real problem, then why after all of these years of automobiles being driven have they not implemented a better oil pump that can pump adequate oil to the engine at idle? How do you know for certain that they haven't already?

It's a real simple solution to what you consider to be a major problem.
I don't think anyone considers it a major problem, like many things it is subjective. To each there own, there are schools of though on both sides of the coin and it is up to the individual to decide for themselves.
Old 04-19-17, 03:05 PM
  #67  
Davew77
Lead Lap
 
Davew77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 750
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Well, I would consider a 15% power loss to be a major problem. If you are pushing 700 hp at the wheels that would be over 100 hp loss at the wheels. That's 1 second off of a 1/4 mile time, or 10 car lengths. At the very least, my 350z should have suffered a 8% loss in power at 100k miles using this logic, and it idled a lot more than 10 minutes at a time. I did not notice any loss. Even a 10 hp loss would have been noticeable in my times, but just barely... 8% would have been like 50 hp... So I guess this 15% loss only happens all at once at 200k miles?

My uncle was servicing fleet vehicles. Some of those fleet vehicles had over 400k miles on them. He said there was no noticeable wear on any of the engine components between the vehicles which idled a lot and those that didn't. Some handled local deliveries while others travelled long distances. The local delivery vehicles idled a lot.

The only differences were with the vehicles that did short trips and didn't run at operating temperature long enough to burn away the impurities in the oil.

I don't know about most members here, but I will not likely have my RC F over 200k miles. I've said about all I can about this. I feel like I'm repeating myself already. Some of what I read on the internet never matches up with my real world experiences. Maybe I'm just lucky...
Old 04-19-17, 06:15 PM
  #68  
GetKinetic
Lead Lap
 
GetKinetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 627
Received 111 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Davew77
That's another thing... I see trucks on the side of the road all of the time with their engines running. Some of those trucks are in service for a million+ miles.

My main point is, if idling has been proven to cause excess engine wear, then where is the proof? So-and-so said this or that is how old wives tales are created. To idle or not to idle... do as you wish. Maybe we should start a new thread on this?
cop cars would be dying left and right if idling was bad
Old 04-19-17, 08:08 PM
  #69  
danielTRLK
Lead Lap
 
danielTRLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 435
Received 121 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Because if manufacturers really wanted Dave, they could easily implement oil filters, not even pumps, that would allow your engine oil to last 25,000 miles, EASY. They don't. There's money that needs to be made on the service side, it's why they don't build indestructible things, otherwise where would the entire automotive industry go? I've been working with an industrial manufacturer who's filtration system has tripled the typical OCI. I asked the owner why he hasn't approached any big OEM's, he said they are all uninterested because it would reduce visits to the service department. Plus your uncle would have been or be out of work.

100,000 is not 200,000 miles. There is an exponential difference between the two. You can idle all day long and not have issues and do 100,000 all day. Power losses do occur on vehicles, the longer you go, the bigger the loss. Bench cell testing reveals this to be true.

I am routinely ONSITE at FD, PDs, Public works, airports and service departments on dime by big oil companies. Cop cars and ambulances die left and right after 100,000 miles. It's why many departments with decent budgets get rid of their rides at 100,000.

I'm sure you uncle has his experience. But he also likely didn't have a dyno to either confirm or deny power losses. You can not see wear in an engine, the same way you can under lab equipment. Also, I'm assuming they were diesel vehicles, which are a different ball game. Even today we're starting to see issues with idling diesels. Why? because of the EPA mandate on ultra low sulfer(max 15ppm), the fuel is no longer as lubricating. and diesel guys love idling.
Old 04-19-17, 11:19 PM
  #70  
lexusnutt
Intermediate
 
lexusnutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 407
Received 36 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Davew77
My uncle also said that to get rid of the excess carbon buildup from excessive idling they used to pour tranny fluid into the throttle body to clean it out. It would smoke really bad until it was burned out, but it cleaned it out and the engine ran better afterwards.
Poor man's Seafoam!
Old 04-20-17, 01:07 PM
  #71  
lexusrus
Pole Position
 
lexusrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 0
Received 250 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

So true. Plus all the ambulances idling for long periods too. I know, I know.......Most ambulances are diesel whereas cop cars are gas.

Also true that the oil in the vehicles in the above examples got changed more often than "normal" operating conditions.


Originally Posted by PunisheRCF
cop cars would be dying left and right if idling was bad
Old 04-26-17, 05:54 PM
  #72  
Buddiiee
Pole Position
 
Buddiiee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Boston
Posts: 327
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulwall4
The mornings still can be cold
Im not here to argue
You think its wasting fuel but i won't move the car till its at temperature
which still takes about 5-10 mins

also mine is still the free 1 year
will i pay for it? not sure
10 minutes of idle? Call Blackstone labs and ask them what that does to your oil...
Old 04-28-17, 11:26 AM
  #73  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,348
Received 3,997 Likes on 2,421 Posts
Default

For all those who would believe automotive malware is not an issue:
Originally Posted by SANS Institute SANS NewsBites Vol. 19 Num. 034
Hyundai Patches Mobile App(April 25 & 26, 2017)
In March, carmaker Hyundai released version 3.9.6 of its Blue Link mobile app to fix a pair of vulnerabilities. Car owners can use the app perform various tasks, including locking and unlocking their vehicles, starting their vehicles remotely, receiving service alerts and other The flaws exist in Hyundai's Blue Link versions 3.9.4 and 3.9.5. One of the flaws involves a failure to verify communications channel endpoints, which could be exploited to launch man-in-the-middle attacks/ The second flaw involves a hard-coded decryption password.
Read more in:https://threatpost.com: Hyundai Patches Leaky Blue Link Mobile App
http://www.eweek.com: Hyundai Mobile App Patched for Car Hacking Vulnerabilities

Last edited by lobuxracer; 04-28-17 at 11:32 AM.
Old 11-07-23, 10:51 PM
  #74  
Chrisris
2nd gear
 
Chrisris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: CT
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default You’re not doing anything wrong

The car kills its self for potential theft or dumb people that think they could.

the car cuts out when the door opens. Many do it with the brake pedal.



Originally Posted by paulwall4
It does that to everyone
Old 11-07-23, 10:53 PM
  #75  
Chrisris
2nd gear
 
Chrisris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: CT
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Not only a winter feature

Originally Posted by mjeds
warmed up? up live in the San Fernando Valley of Southern California, the only thing you are doing is wasting fuel. I could see it if you lived in the Snow Belt, but here in Socal what exactly do you need to warm up?
Air conditioning for super hot days is a nice thing, why get into an oven waiting for the ac to kick in?


Quick Reply: Sorry, But your Remote Start Won't Work



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:55 PM.