People with the rr supercharger, what 0-60 numbers are you pulling now?
#33
soon™
#34
#36
Full of What? You don't know **** about m3s do you. The group I am in has couple of m3s pushing 600 horses. They get little traction and by the time they do, it takes them time to catch up. If I sent you text after text of after races, then prepare to send payments. I have there instagram pages and there text after races. It's not all about power, it's about traction. If my RCF is able to keep up with tune m3s, stock for stock, I am sure I will win or keep even every race
Here is a video I posted of an RCF vs a tuned C43. A tuned M3 would have pulled even harder. https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...-amg-race.html
Last edited by TXgearhead; 12-31-18 at 08:33 AM.
#37
did you not read closely? They do not get traction, hence from a 10 or 20 roll I am beating them before we reach triple digits. No need to prove anything. This conversation is old topic.
#38
My video shows the exact opposite of what you claim. https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...-amg-race.html
#39
Prove yourself. Post a video or stop talking about beating faster cars. That’s an easy solution, as it sounds like you race a lot.
My video shows the exact opposite of what you claim. https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...-amg-race.html
I work with a lot of heavily modified cars and we race time to time. Will post up the text from the m3s. Just because you lost doesnt mean I should lose. A lot of factors. I beat a 16k modified 335i 2017 which is heavily tuned by fabspeed pushing around 400hp and torque a little higher. Car is a lot lighter as well. I test drive my clients cars after each races. The RCF feels like a tank, but in a good solid way.
Last edited by Spam89; 12-31-18 at 09:05 AM.
The following users liked this post:
05RollaXRS (12-31-18)
#40
Not a cl43 but a cla45amg with tune and exhaust. 5 runs and had 2.5 cars on him each run to 100. My car only has ark exhaust.
I work with a lot of heavily modified cars and we race time to time. Will post up the text from the m3s. Just because you lost doesnt mean I should lose. A lot of factors. I beat a 16k modified 335i 2017 which is heavily tuned by fabspeed pushing around 400hp and torque a little higher. Car is a lot lighter as well. I test drive my clients cars after each races. The RCF feels like a tank, but in a good solid way.
I work with a lot of heavily modified cars and we race time to time. Will post up the text from the m3s. Just because you lost doesnt mean I should lose. A lot of factors. I beat a 16k modified 335i 2017 which is heavily tuned by fabspeed pushing around 400hp and torque a little higher. Car is a lot lighter as well. I test drive my clients cars after each races. The RCF feels like a tank, but in a good solid way.
You didn’t beat a “2017 335i” because they stopped making that car in 2015. The 340i replaces it with the B58 motor in 2016. Not to mention you can make 400 hp in that car tune only, where did the rest of that $15,000 go?
“Just because you lost doesn’t mean I should lose”. I just posted a video of my buddies tune only C43 pulling on an RCF from a slow roll...
Instead of posts text messages, how about you just record your next race to end this debate?
For reference, here is a “tune only” M3 beating a Hellcat. Are you saying your exhaust only RCF is faster that a Hellcat too?
Last edited by TXgearhead; 12-31-18 at 11:07 AM.
The following users liked this post:
LRCSALES (01-02-19)
#41
Your proof is a guy that says “hits sick fast” and “my turbo will scroll up sooner” (he has scroll confused with spool). I believe you beat a CLA45. They don’t make much more on a tune because the stock turbo is working hard (28 psi) from the factory.
You didn’t beat a “2017 335i” because they stopped making that car in 2015. The 340i replaces it with the B58 motor in 2016. Not to mention you can make 400 hp in that car tune only, where did the rest of that $15,000 go?
“Just because you lost doesn’t mean I should lose”. I just posted a video of my buddies tune only C43 pulling on an RCF from a slow roll...
Instead of posts text messages, how about you just record your next race to end this debate?
here is the extra 15000. Suspension, brakes, wraps, intercooler, engine work, and more.
#42
Also read till the end, I was about 30 feet ahead of him. I won the race, 5 rolls and still won. His car is on fabspeed if it is still up there. The closest race, more then a m3, was a Apr stage 2 Audi a6 2016 with upgraded pulley, intake, and exhaust. Makes more power then my car but still manage to hold up and inch at top end
#43
He is contradicting himself. He is posting a rolling race video of a C43 beating a poorly driven RCF when every single test shows RCF is quicker beyond the 1/4 mile by a big margin. RCF is the quicker car unless it is at very high altitude where N/A lose power. C&D had them more than 1 second apart from 0-130 mph. A properly driven RCF SHOULD destroy a C43 from a rolling race. This is just an example of the same driver, same road and same VBOX.
RCF 0-200 km/h: 14.5 seconds (no launch control)
C43 AMG 0-200 km/h: 15.4 seconds (with launch control and the new '19 390 HP version and not the slower '18 version)
RCF 0-200 km/h: 14.5 seconds (no launch control)
C43 AMG 0-200 km/h: 15.4 seconds (with launch control and the new '19 390 HP version and not the slower '18 version)
Last edited by 05RollaXRS; 12-31-18 at 11:24 AM.
#44
He is contradicting himself. He is posting a rolling race video of a C43 beating a poorly driven RCF when every single test shows RCF is quicker beyond the 1/4 mile by a big margin. RCF is the quicker car unless it is at very high altitude where N/A lose power. C&D had them more than 1 second apart from 0-130 mph. A properly driven RCF SHOULD destroy a C43 from a rolling race. This is just an example of the same driver, same road and same VBOX.
RCF 0-200 km/h: 14.5 seconds (no launch control)
C43 AMG 0-200 km/h: 15.4 seconds (with launch control and the new '19 390 HP version and not the '18 version)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-J0p449l9-8&t=86s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWUD101pHCc&t=105s
RCF 0-200 km/h: 14.5 seconds (no launch control)
C43 AMG 0-200 km/h: 15.4 seconds (with launch control and the new '19 390 HP version and not the '18 version)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-J0p449l9-8&t=86s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWUD101pHCc&t=105s