RC F (2015-present) Discussion topics related to the RC F model

People with the rr supercharger, what 0-60 numbers are you pulling now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-18, 09:11 AM
  #31  
Burch_RCF
Driver
 
Burch_RCF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 171
Received 65 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

This thread is fun
Old 12-20-18, 10:09 AM
  #32  
MisterEun
Pole Position
 
MisterEun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Georgia
Posts: 363
Received 88 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spam89
lol mistereun you are hilarious. I see you busting his *** all the time lol!!
lol to be fair I do it in moderation.
Only second time I've brought it up after 30 threads.
Old 12-20-18, 10:58 AM
  #33  
Lammyyy
Pole Position
 
Lammyyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: CA
Posts: 272
Received 74 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MisterEun
On my end, I'm still wondering if Xzria is ever actually going to buy the car before creating these threads...
I would rename the thread: I still haven't bought the car but here's another question.
Just you wait man - Xzria will start 3 threads a day about his RC-F when he gets it LOL

soon™
Old 12-21-18, 06:46 AM
  #34  
MisterEun
Pole Position
 
MisterEun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Georgia
Posts: 363
Received 88 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lammyyy
Just you wait man - Xzria will start 3 threads a day about his RC-F when he gets it LOL

soon™
haha if he gets the car and posts less than before, that would be the real kicker.
Old 12-21-18, 03:48 PM
  #35  
yooniverse
Lead Lap
 
yooniverse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: California
Posts: 407
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lammyyy
Just you wait man - Xzria will start 3 threads a day about his RC-F when he gets it LOL

soon™
Does this Xzria even exist?
Old 12-31-18, 07:29 AM
  #36  
TXgearhead
Intermediate
 
TXgearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 296
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spam89
Full of What? You don't know **** about m3s do you. The group I am in has couple of m3s pushing 600 horses. They get little traction and by the time they do, it takes them time to catch up. If I sent you text after text of after races, then prepare to send payments. I have there instagram pages and there text after races. It's not all about power, it's about traction. If my RCF is able to keep up with tune m3s, stock for stock, I am sure I will win or keep even every race
I agree with 4everkidd. A tuned M3 will blow the doors off on an RCF and your exhaust mod don’t make anywhere near the power gains that a tune does on a turbo car. Why don’t have a friend film next time so people here actually believe you.

Here is a video I posted of an RCF vs a tuned C43. A tuned M3 would have pulled even harder. https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...-amg-race.html

Last edited by TXgearhead; 12-31-18 at 07:33 AM.
Old 12-31-18, 07:32 AM
  #37  
Spam89
Intermediate
 
Spam89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 431
Received 47 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXgearhead


I agree with 4everkidd. A tuned M3 will blow the doors off on an RCF and your exhaust mod don’t make anywhere near the power gains that a tune does on a turbo car. Why don’t have a friend film next time so people here actually believe you.
did you not read closely? They do not get traction, hence from a 10 or 20 roll I am beating them before we reach triple digits. No need to prove anything. This conversation is old topic.
Old 12-31-18, 07:35 AM
  #38  
TXgearhead
Intermediate
 
TXgearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 296
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spam89
did you not read closely? They do not get traction, hence from a 10 or 20 roll I am beating them before we reach triple digits. No need to prove anything. This conversation is old topic.
Prove yourself. Post a video or stop talking about beating faster cars. That’s an easy solution, as it sounds like you race a lot.

My video shows the exact opposite of what you claim. https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...-amg-race.html
Old 12-31-18, 07:56 AM
  #39  
Spam89
Intermediate
 
Spam89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 431
Received 47 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXgearhead


Prove yourself. Post a video or stop talking about beating faster cars. That’s an easy solution, as it sounds like you race a lot.

My video shows the exact opposite of what you claim. https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...-amg-race.html
Not a cl43 but a cla45amg with tune and exhaust. 5 runs and had 2.5 cars on him each run to 100. My car only has ark exhaust.


I work with a lot of heavily modified cars and we race time to time. Will post up the text from the m3s. Just because you lost doesnt mean I should lose. A lot of factors. I beat a 16k modified 335i 2017 which is heavily tuned by fabspeed pushing around 400hp and torque a little higher. Car is a lot lighter as well. I test drive my clients cars after each races. The RCF feels like a tank, but in a good solid way.



Last edited by Spam89; 12-31-18 at 08:05 AM.
The following users liked this post:
05RollaXRS (12-31-18)
Old 12-31-18, 10:04 AM
  #40  
TXgearhead
Intermediate
 
TXgearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 296
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spam89
Not a cl43 but a cla45amg with tune and exhaust. 5 runs and had 2.5 cars on him each run to 100. My car only has ark exhaust.


I work with a lot of heavily modified cars and we race time to time. Will post up the text from the m3s. Just because you lost doesnt mean I should lose. A lot of factors. I beat a 16k modified 335i 2017 which is heavily tuned by fabspeed pushing around 400hp and torque a little higher. Car is a lot lighter as well. I test drive my clients cars after each races. The RCF feels like a tank, but in a good solid way.

Your proof is a guy that says “hits sick fast” and “my turbo will scroll up sooner” (he has scroll confused with spool). I believe you beat a CLA45. They don’t make much more on a tune because the stock turbo is working hard (28 psi) from the factory.

You didn’t beat a “2017 335i” because they stopped making that car in 2015. The 340i replaces it with the B58 motor in 2016. Not to mention you can make 400 hp in that car tune only, where did the rest of that $15,000 go?

“Just because you lost doesn’t mean I should lose”. I just posted a video of my buddies tune only C43 pulling on an RCF from a slow roll...

Instead of posts text messages, how about you just record your next race to end this debate?

For reference, here is a “tune only” M3 beating a Hellcat. Are you saying your exhaust only RCF is faster that a Hellcat too?

Last edited by TXgearhead; 12-31-18 at 10:07 AM.
The following users liked this post:
LRCSALES (01-02-19)
Old 12-31-18, 10:09 AM
  #41  
Spam89
Intermediate
 
Spam89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 431
Received 47 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXgearhead


Your proof is a guy that says “hits sick fast” and “my turbo will scroll up sooner” (he has scroll confused with spool). I believe you beat a CLA45. They don’t make much more on a tune because the stock turbo is working hard (28 psi) from the factory.

You didn’t beat a “2017 335i” because they stopped making that car in 2015. The 340i replaces it with the B58 motor in 2016. Not to mention you can make 400 hp in that car tune only, where did the rest of that $15,000 go?

“Just because you lost doesn’t mean I should lose”. I just posted a video of my buddies tune only C43 pulling on an RCF from a slow roll...

Instead of posts text messages, how about you just record your next race to end this debate?
sorry don't know much about bmw so I guess it was a 2015. I don't record any races due to my sake and my client sakes. Also, he has aftermarket parts such as wheels and such. I have all the text and races to prove, not just on video. My clients records them but lazy to upload them.

here is the extra 15000. Suspension, brakes, wraps, intercooler, engine work, and more.

Old 12-31-18, 10:10 AM
  #42  
Spam89
Intermediate
 
Spam89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 431
Received 47 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Also read till the end, I was about 30 feet ahead of him. I won the race, 5 rolls and still won. His car is on fabspeed if it is still up there. The closest race, more then a m3, was a Apr stage 2 Audi a6 2016 with upgraded pulley, intake, and exhaust. Makes more power then my car but still manage to hold up and inch at top end
Old 12-31-18, 10:15 AM
  #43  
05RollaXRS
Lexus Test Driver
 
05RollaXRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 9,961
Received 2,504 Likes on 1,802 Posts
Default

He is contradicting himself. He is posting a rolling race video of a C43 beating a poorly driven RCF when every single test shows RCF is quicker beyond the 1/4 mile by a big margin. RCF is the quicker car unless it is at very high altitude where N/A lose power. C&D had them more than 1 second apart from 0-130 mph. A properly driven RCF SHOULD destroy a C43 from a rolling race. This is just an example of the same driver, same road and same VBOX.

RCF 0-200 km/h: 14.5 seconds (no launch control)
C43 AMG 0-200 km/h: 15.4 seconds (with launch control and the new '19 390 HP version and not the slower '18 version)



Last edited by 05RollaXRS; 12-31-18 at 10:24 AM.
Old 12-31-18, 10:24 AM
  #44  
TXgearhead
Intermediate
 
TXgearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 296
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 05RollaXRS
He is contradicting himself. He is posting a rolling race video of a C43 beating a poorly driven RCF when every single test shows RCF is quicker beyond the 1/4 mile by a big margin. RCF is the quicker car unless it is at very high altitude where N/A lose power. C&D had them more than 1 second apart from 0-130 mph. A properly driven RCF SHOULD destroy a C43 from a rolling race. This is just an example of the same driver, same road and same VBOX.

RCF 0-200 km/h: 14.5 seconds (no launch control)
C43 AMG 0-200 km/h: 15.4 seconds (with launch control and the new '19 390 HP version and not the '18 version)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-J0p449l9-8&t=86s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWUD101pHCc&t=105s
I said twice that the C43 was tuned... It is running 20 psi vs the stock 12 psi in this video. A stock RCF is faster than a C43, no doubt.
Old 12-31-18, 10:26 AM
  #45  
Spam89
Intermediate
 
Spam89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 431
Received 47 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Will be racing a tune civic type r soon with 400 hp and mid 350 toque. Will see how that goes. No videos only text lol


Quick Reply: People with the rr supercharger, what 0-60 numbers are you pulling now?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:08 AM.