RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003) Discussion topics related to the 1999 -2003 RX300 models

sludge! ticking time bomb?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-08, 06:46 PM
  #16  
powerslide
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
powerslide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: LA.
Posts: 78
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Trans.

I have 79,000 miles on my 2001. I did not want a trailer hitch on mine. These things to me were never made to tow even though the dealer may say it is ok. I have only changed the trans. fluid twice and have not had a problem. We live on flat ground in the South and don`t have to pull throught snow,hills or anything on the road. I have never been {off roading**. I wonder if some of these things could factor in an early trans. failure?
Old 12-06-08, 07:33 PM
  #17  
salimshah
Moderator
 
salimshah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 15,438
Received 1,043 Likes on 941 Posts
Default

0 weight will be thinner than 30 weight, but 0-30 maintains the flow rate within acceptable tolerance when environment is cold or hot. The consistent flow rate is controlled by additives. It is not a 50-50 mix of 0 weight and 30 weight oils. So an ideal 0-30 weight oil should have the flow rate of 30 weight at high-temp and of 0 weight at low temp.

Personally I have stuck with 10-30 weight range [small spread .. less additives] and it covers the temperature range of central Texas.


Salim
Old 12-06-08, 08:14 PM
  #18  
powerslide
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
powerslide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: LA.
Posts: 78
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 5w-20w

It looks like Toyota and the big 3 are now recommending 5w-20w or 0w-20w?
Old 12-06-08, 08:31 PM
  #19  
Lexmex
Super Moderator
 
Lexmex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 17,246
Received 161 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powerslide
It looks like Toyota and the big 3 are now recommending 5w-20w or 0w-20w?
Stick with 30, especially given that our RX300s are now much older.
Old 12-07-08, 08:02 AM
  #20  
bob2200
Driver
 
bob2200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,800
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powerslide
Does Toyota now call for a 20w? ...
I wonder if this may lessen the sludge problem with a thinner weight? Maybe that`s why they changed the new spec`s.
I suspect the main reason was to raise the fuel economy numbers (through use of thinner oil).
Old 12-07-08, 11:57 PM
  #21  
code58
Lexus Champion
 
code58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ca.
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bob2200
I suspect the main reason was to raise the fuel economy numbers (through use of thinner oil).
Bob-I wonder if you could get .1 of a mile to the gallon more by changing from say 30wt to 0-30wt. I don't know, but I have read many times that the actual reason was because a lot of the vehicles now use variable valve timing (both of ours do) and that they want the oil pressure to get to the valve system quickly because it depends on the pressure to operate the VVTiming. My wife's Toyota (and I suspicion many of them do) cranks longer than needed to start (maybe a second and a half) because the ignition is not activated until there is some oil pressure. It bothered me when we got it new until I realized why it did that. Modern engines are fit so much more precisely than they used to be and therefore need thinner oil to get into all the wear surfaces.
Old 12-08-08, 10:48 AM
  #22  
lexus114
Lexus Champion
 
lexus114's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bethlehem Twsp. Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,507
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by powerslide
I have 79,000 miles on my 2001. I did not want a trailer hitch on mine. These things to me were never made to tow even though the dealer may say it is ok. I have only changed the trans. fluid twice and have not had a problem. We live on flat ground in the South and don`t have to pull throught snow,hills or anything on the road. I have never been {off roading**. I wonder if some of these things could factor in an early trans. failure?
Doubtful,their just not a strong enough tranmission for the weight,torqe etc.At least where the AWD is concerned anyway.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kizmazz
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
10
05-06-19 09:38 PM
xion0374
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
10
07-22-15 09:21 AM
awwad
LS - 4th Gen (2007-2017)
2
07-19-15 02:23 PM
daryll40
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
17
12-13-11 09:56 AM
LexusSexus
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
29
03-21-05 09:01 PM



Quick Reply: sludge! ticking time bomb?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:28 AM.