2002 AWD - Problems
#1
Rookie
Thread Starter
2002 AWD - Problems
Long time lurker and nearly ready to take the plunge of a RX3xx.
I am looking at a 2002 AWD. Does this year suffer from transmission issues similar to the rates from previous years?
Is there a best year of the 1999-2003 design?
I am looking at a 2002 AWD. Does this year suffer from transmission issues similar to the rates from previous years?
Is there a best year of the 1999-2003 design?
#6
Lexus Test Driver
#7
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did tow a personal watercraft on one trip from Tennessee to Florida. Not many hills on that trip and a PWC is a pretty light load. Otherwise, conservative driving. If I was in a hurry I took the Ferrari or the NSX. Bottom line, I probably would not purchase a first generation RX300 due to transmission and sluge issues. Nothing happens to everyone and I sincerely hope you have better luck. Russ
#11
Hi, could you recall any symptom before the transmission failure?
Obviously I hoped drain and fill would do the job too, it just didn't.
I did tow a personal watercraft on one trip from Tennessee to Florida. Not many hills on that trip and a PWC is a pretty light load. Otherwise, conservative driving. If I was in a hurry I took the Ferrari or the NSX. Bottom line, I probably would not purchase a first generation RX300 due to transmission and sluge issues. Nothing happens to everyone and I sincerely hope you have better luck. Russ
I did tow a personal watercraft on one trip from Tennessee to Florida. Not many hills on that trip and a PWC is a pretty light load. Otherwise, conservative driving. If I was in a hurry I took the Ferrari or the NSX. Bottom line, I probably would not purchase a first generation RX300 due to transmission and sluge issues. Nothing happens to everyone and I sincerely hope you have better luck. Russ
#12
Lexus Test Driver
If there were really so many failures, then toyota would have instated a recall, or a price reduction of some sort rather than just a loyal customer reduction. Obviously, the problem isn't as big as it looks....But whatever, you can either look at the glass half-full or half-empty.
#13
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
If you looked at the consumer reports listing a couple of years ago when it went back to 1999, you would have seen the RX300 "Major Transmission Problems" entry going from: much better than average (2002), to better than average (2001), to average (2000), to worse than average (1999). I suspect if they continued them back to 1999 today, it would read: better than average (2002), average (2001), worse than average (2000), much worse than average (1999).
I doubt it.
I doubt it.
#14
Lexus Test Driver
Toyota extended warranty for sludge didn't they.... so if they thought that this issue was bad enough they would have gave some sort of incentive.
Either way, it's a known fact these RX's have an issue with transmission failures. It's probably better that we talk about how to prevent this rather than "argue" over whether it was due to lack of maintenance or just bad design, or some of both. (i use the term argue, very lightly in this context)
Either way, it's a known fact these RX's have an issue with transmission failures. It's probably better that we talk about how to prevent this rather than "argue" over whether it was due to lack of maintenance or just bad design, or some of both. (i use the term argue, very lightly in this context)
#15
Instructor
Fact is that in 1999 at least, unless the vehicle was routinely operated in adverse conditions (e.g. trailer towing, dusty conditions, extended idling) there was NO recommended interval for changing the automatic transmission fluid.