RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003) Discussion topics related to the 1999 -2003 RX300 models

Timing Belt Service - Need Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-12 | 10:03 PM
  #31  
RoX300's Avatar
RoX300
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 2
From: MD
Default Gates identifies the RX300 as a free-running or non-interference engine application

I don't claim to be an expert but according to Gates, the largest manufacturer of timing belts, the 1st generation RX300's are classified as Free-Running or Non-interference engines.

There are other Lexus models, such as the V-8 4.0 L GS400; LS400; SC400, that are interference engines.

Here's a link to a helpful replacement guide published by Gates: http://www.gates.com/common/download...ementGuide.pdf

I had also been told by my Lexus dealer that the RX300 is non-interference. I've attached a screen shot from the Gates guide.

Perhaps your posts refer to other Lexus models rather than the RX?
Attached Thumbnails Timing Belt Service - Need Advice-copy-of-timing-belts-2-001.jpg  
Old 11-25-12 | 01:49 AM
  #32  
salimshah's Avatar
salimshah
Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,749
Likes: 1,134
From: Austin, TX
Default

SC400 (at least '95 and before), which share the engine of LS400 of that era are non-vvt and are non- interfering. GS400 is vvvt and is interference type [here we agree].

Retractions have been published for RX.

Maybe a certified Lexus tech can weigh in on this. I dont claim to be an expert. [My advice is worth the money I get for my posts]

I would not use or recommend Gates T-belt. OEM come pre-marked for easy install.

Salim

Last edited by salimshah; 11-25-12 at 01:56 AM.
Old 11-25-12 | 06:24 AM
  #33  
hypervish's Avatar
hypervish
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,700
Likes: 92
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by salimshah
There is some misinformation floating around.

Please do not believe everything that is on the net ... including this one

VVT engines are interfering type.

Salim
+1, the VVT(-I) engines are interference.
Old 11-25-12 | 02:36 PM
  #34  
RoX300's Avatar
RoX300
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 2
From: MD
Default

Salim,

I agree. I'd love to have a certified Lexus tech weigh in on this important topic so that we all know for sure.

Thanks,
RoX300
Old 11-26-12 | 12:40 AM
  #35  
code58's Avatar
code58
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 14
From: Ca.
Default

This poor horse has been beaten to death for years. I don't even think certified mechanics all agree on the issue as it depends where the VVT has the valves when the belt goes. It MAY be non-interference under some circumstances and interference under others. IF Gates got the info from Toyota, and it is INCORRECT, it wouldn't be the 1st time Toyota suplied incorrect info in their official shop manual.
Old 12-03-12 | 09:01 AM
  #36  
cbones1979's Avatar
cbones1979
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: pa
Default

Called lexus

the confirmed VVTI (interference)

They said you should be able to see VVTI on engine if it is indeed interference or not.

Last edited by cbones1979; 12-03-12 at 09:13 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SweetS160
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
9
04-28-14 03:09 PM
JAB
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
5
04-17-14 02:06 PM
milellie11
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
18
06-22-10 11:21 PM
acf
Maintenance
5
02-13-04 10:52 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:11 PM.