RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003) Discussion topics related to the 1999 -2003 RX300 models

P1354 code problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-13, 03:28 PM
  #1  
ididit
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
ididit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default P1354 code problem

my car began throw 2 codes in the past 2 weeks.

P0330, P1354

I already replace OCV Bank 2(rear bank), clean IACV. but the P1354 code still exist. I still have misfire code P0300, P0302, P0304, P0306. What else can I do to erase P1354?

for P0330, I plan to use the trick introduced by Bobster999 to erase the code.

do you think erasing P0330 first will help erase P1354?

UPDATE: just replace another OCV bank(front bank--close to bumper), turns out that this one is the bank 2, the previous one is bank 1. I guess that I miss the point where to view the 2 banks.

now, code P1354 is gone. only P0330 left. I'll finish it tomorrow.

Last edited by ididit; 05-04-13 at 08:13 PM.
Old 05-05-13, 12:14 AM
  #2  
code58
Lexus Champion
 
code58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ca.
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Do you in fact know that the P0330 code isn't a valid DTC? You wouldn't want to erase it if it were valid since it could cause engine damage if there was no detection of knock if it actually existed.
Old 05-05-13, 01:25 AM
  #3  
ididit
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
ididit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by code58
Do you in fact know that the P0330 code isn't a valid DTC? You wouldn't want to erase it if it were valid since it could cause engine damage if there was no detection of knock if it actually existed.
Thanks for your remind. actually, it is the place that bothers me. based on Bobster999's method, it did fool the ECU. But then why do they set up this P0330 code? it should not mean nothing. if we fool ECU, what potential problem are we facing?

BTW, do you see my diagram reply to Bobster999's method? https://www.clublexus.com/forums/rx-...ck-repair.html

the last thread is mine. is it correct?
Old 05-05-13, 10:49 AM
  #4  
salimshah
Moderator
 
salimshah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 15,632
Received 1,097 Likes on 987 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ididit
Thanks for your remind. actually, it is the place that bothers me. based on Bobster999's method, it did fool the ECU. But then why do they set up this P0330 code? it should not mean nothing. if we fool ECU, what potential problem are we facing?

BTW, do you see my diagram reply to Bobster999's method? https://www.clublexus.com/forums/rx-...ck-repair.html

the last thread is mine. is it correct?
Bobster has put in enough disclaimers. IN summary, you ignoring the sensor output with the premise that the sensor is producing wrong output. Please see my comments in the "Having problems start here mega thread" sticky on sensors.


Salim
Old 05-06-13, 12:59 AM
  #5  
code58
Lexus Champion
 
code58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ca.
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ididit
Thanks for your remind. actually, it is the place that bothers me. based on Bobster999's method, it did fool the ECU. But then why do they set up this P0330 code? it should not mean nothing. if we fool ECU, what potential problem are we facing?

BTW, do you see my diagram reply to Bobster999's method? https://www.clublexus.com/forums/rx-...ck-repair.html

the last thread is mine. is it correct?
Both sensors are engineered into the picture because one sensor might not pick up the knock from either bank well enough to protect the engine completely. In Bobster999's case, I'm not sure he intended to leave it that way PERMANENTLY, but didn't feel like tearing into it at this time because it's a big job and he needed the car. The one sensor MIGHT be able to detect a serious enough detonation knock from the other bank or may not. You have to remember the purpose of the sensors is to adjust the timing to compensate for low octane fuel or serious lugging (say a 10 % grade) or other conditions requiring timing adjustment to prevent serious detonation (spark knock). If the sensors aren't working and it's driven that way, engine self destruction is the eventual end result. That's about a $7500. mistake. I wouldn't worry too much about doing it 999's way, but if you hear ANY detonation, put high octane fuel in and don't continue to drive it once you reach your (close) destination. It probably isn't a good PERMANENT solution.
Your ilustration is correct. STRONGLY consider not making it permanent though.
Old 05-06-13, 08:32 PM
  #6  
Victor520
Driver School Candidate
 
Victor520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: usa
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

code table: http://www.spobd2.com/service/diagno...wnload-38.html
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SCORP69
IS F (2008-2014)
0
03-07-19 12:04 PM
jasawh
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
0
02-24-18 06:29 AM
-Future-
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
6
01-26-10 10:50 PM



Quick Reply: P1354 code problem



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:51 PM.