RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009) Discussion topics related to the 2004 -2009 RX330, RX350 and RX400H models

Toyota highlander and RX 330

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-05, 11:57 AM
  #31  
blue_rx330
Rookie
 
blue_rx330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default here's theory#2 then...

OK - theory#2:

The RX330 had the 3.3 liter drivetrain about 8 months before the Highlander got it. When I took delivery of my RX330, the highlander hadn't even announced they were upgrading to the 3.3 engine.

So Toyota had a chance a few extra months to apply any TSBs or unpublished fixes to the drivetrain on the Highlander since they had 8 months of lead time with the RX330.
(translation - Lexus owners beta tested that drivetrain for Toyota)
Old 03-10-05, 11:58 AM
  #32  
HarrierAWD
Lexus Champion
 
HarrierAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,754
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lexusfreak
There you go blue! I agree & that's my whole point to this Problems come out of any plant sometimes no matter what country the vehicle is built in. Robot's mostly put these vehicles together with the help of humans......Japanese or Canadian makes no difference.

If the RX plant in Japan was so great & the RX (or any Lexus model for that matter) was so well put together (read: Perfect) these forums would be almost empty with only comments of praise & questions of maintenance & colours.
Don't get so excited buddy. That's just one car. I know someone who had a Dodge Neon with zero defect for 6 years, even though it is rated one of the least reliable cars in the market.

"Teething" problem cannot be used as an excuse for RX330's decline in quality and reliability. I believe that I have refuted that claim by using the new-gen Highlander as an example. It has excellent reliability rating and it is built in the same Kyushu plant as the Japanese-built RX330. Apparently the "non-Japanese-built" (Hope this is more politically correct.) RX330 is bringing down the rating.

No improvement can be made unless people first acknowledge there is a problem that needs fixing. I believe the "non-Japanese" plant will eventually be up to the usual Toyota standard, like the Kentucky plant. It's just not there yet. Once the Kaizen approach is fully applied, it can do wonders for its workforce.

Last edited by HarrierAWD; 03-10-05 at 12:19 PM.
Old 03-10-05, 12:08 PM
  #33  
HarrierAWD
Lexus Champion
 
HarrierAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,754
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blue_rx330
OK - theory#2:

The RX330 had the 3.3 liter drivetrain about 8 months before the Highlander got it. When I took delivery of my RX330, the highlander hadn't even announced they were upgrading to the 3.3 engine.

So Toyota had a chance a few extra months to apply any TSBs or unpublished fixes to the drivetrain on the Highlander since they had 8 months of lead time with the RX330.
(translation - Lexus owners beta tested that drivetrain for Toyota)
Possible. Though I don't think the tranny fix was out before the new Highlander came out. Some in CL also claimed continued problems after the fix was applied.

Also note that the powertrain came from different sources. The "non-Japanese-built" (again, trying to be PC here.) RX330 get its powertrain from a Toyota plant in the "Appalachian Mountains." The new-gen Highlander and Japanese-built RX330 get its powertrain from Japan of course.

I believe Toyota's game plan is to eventually build all the 3.3L engine only in the North America since it's offered in North American market only. Europe and Asia get a 3.0L engine. Of course rumor has it that the RX will get the 3.5L engine to get back in the horsepower race with Infiniti and Acura.
Old 03-10-05, 01:29 PM
  #34  
blue_rx330
Rookie
 
blue_rx330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Tranny TSB

>>Though I don't think the tranny fix was out before the new Highlander came out. Some in CL also claimed continued problems after the fix was applied.

================
Make : LEXUS Model : RX330 Year : 2004
Manufacturer : TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Service Bulletin Num : TC00503 Date of Bulletin: AUG 11, 2003
NHTSA Item Number: 10003558
Component: POWER TRAIN
Summary:
ECM CALIBRATION SHIFTING ENHANCEMENT. *TT
================

The shifting enhancement went public in early August 2003. I'm fairly sure August was the same month or a month before the 2004 Highlander went on sale to the public with the 3.3 drivetrain.
Old 03-10-05, 10:48 PM
  #35  
Lexusfreak
Pole Position
 
Lexusfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St. Thomas, Ontario
Posts: 3,379
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by HarrierAWD
Don't get so excited buddy. That's just one car.

I know someone who had a Dodge Neon with zero defect for 6 years, even though it is rated one of the least reliable cars in the market.
Nobody is getting excited.......not me at least "non Japanese plant" lol

Well said krpster & I agree with you! But yet others accused you of "personal attacks"? But yet you get on the ignore list?
Old 03-11-05, 06:52 AM
  #36  
TED_FR
Driver
 
TED_FR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: France
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HarrierAWD
Not to hurt the Canadian pride, but I pay attention to the product, not how well the factory looked. FWIW, the Saturn and Corvette plants look fantastic, but the cars' quality & reliability are PoS.

Browse the RX forum in the past, you'll see many posts about performance mods, appearance package, big size wheels, etc. After the Canadian RX330 arrived, the RX forum has turned into whining sessions about tranny shift, rattles, suspension noise, etc.

Toyota/Lexus manages its quality control by the Japanese Kaizen approach. In business management terms, the Kaizen approach dictates that the quality of the workers must improve first, then the product or service. It will take a while for Canadian workers to buy into Kaizen. There's no shame in that. When Toyota first built Camry in Kentucky, it took about 3 years to get the workers in line with the management. Toyota obviously don't want to push the workers too hard too soon. They don't want to see a repeat of the "Gung Ho" movie where cultures clash.
Some years ago, Toyota set up a new plant in nothern France to build the small city car YARIS (called Echo on some other marckets). So far as all Toyota cars sold in France, the Yaris was known as a extremely reliable car.
When the first Yaris came out of the new plant, they had minor but real assembly and quality problems. It took a year or so to get the french plant up to the level of the Japanese production. Now problems are behind us and the quality is of a top level.

It is not a matter of skills, culture or method. It is about launching a new industry project and this can't be done in a day. Moving the production of a car from one plant to another one is a difficult exercise. If on the top of this the model is a new model, you get the exercise even more difficult .the company succeeding with no mistakes would be very lucky
Old 03-11-05, 02:04 PM
  #37  
krpster
Rookie
 
krpster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TED_FR
It is not a matter of skills, culture or method. It is about launching a new industry project and this can't be done in a day. Moving the production of a car from one plant to another one is a difficult exercise. If on the top of this the model is a new model, you get the exercise even more difficult .the company succeeding with no mistakes would be very lucky
Well said TED.
Old 03-11-05, 06:03 PM
  #38  
700t
Driver School Candidate
 
700t's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blue_rx330
OK - theory#2:

The RX330 had the 3.3 liter drivetrain about 8 months before the Highlander got it. When I took delivery of my RX330, the highlander hadn't even announced they were upgrading to the 3.3 engine.

So Toyota had a chance a few extra months to apply any TSBs or unpublished fixes to the drivetrain on the Highlander since they had 8 months of lead time with the RX330.
(translation - Lexus owners beta tested that drivetrain for Toyota)
It's kind of ironic that Lexus engines after a few years end up in Toyotas like the 3.0 vvti in the 99 RX300 went to the 01 Sienna , Highlander. The 4.7 in the LX470 ended up in a Tundra a third of the price. The 3.3 in the RX is now in the Camry, Solara , Sienna and HL.
On the topic of assembly quality @ TMMC, in the 03 Corolla and Matrix which are built on the same line, the JD power score was very good for Corolla but very bad for Matrix.
This proves it is not TMMC but engineering problems when the car was designed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
branchcm7
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
4
10-31-13 09:40 AM
jkhsu
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
9
05-14-10 12:14 PM
biff44
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
26
02-14-10 10:18 PM
sleepybobcat
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
1
03-25-01 02:23 PM



Quick Reply: Toyota highlander and RX 330



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 PM.