RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009) Discussion topics related to the 2004 -2009 RX330, RX350 and RX400H models

rx 350 vs rx 400h

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-08 | 09:54 AM
  #16  
salimshah's Avatar
salimshah
Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,700
Likes: 1,118
From: Austin, TX
Default

The argument on the fuel cost-vs-savings is a dynamic issue. Today it might be almost break even but who knows in 6 months it can be a huge savings as the fuel prices will change.

So how what is the expected life of the batteries (or number of charge cycles)?
What is their replacement cost?
What is the environment impact (100% recycle-able or what)?


Salim
Old 04-07-08 | 09:59 AM
  #17  
RXSF's Avatar
RXSF
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,059
Likes: 74
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

concerning the batteries,

i believe there is an 8 year warranty on them, and even then, it doesnt mean that at 8 years, they will need to be replaced.

but if you do need to replace them, you look at some big $$$

environmental impact? still not sure, but i know lexus gives the dealers, or whoever ends up with the battery pack a small check if they turn in the batteries so that they can be properly disposed of.

honestly, if the RX400h was out in 2003 when i bought my car, i would have chosen the hybrid. sure, theres the fuel savings, however minimal, but i also believe that everyone needs to reduce their impact of C02. i think one of my next cars will be the new gen prius
Old 04-07-08 | 10:21 AM
  #18  
Boognish's Avatar
Boognish
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

We test drove both. We found that the hybrid had an annoying vibration that the 350 did not have and that 350 was smoother. We could not justify a hybrid because most of our driving in this vehicle is on freeway road trips where the gas mileage benefit was minimal at best. I would have definitely preferred a modern turbo diesel motor, but the *thinking people of California* have made them illegal for the time being.
Old 04-07-08 | 11:40 AM
  #19  
mgtn101's Avatar
mgtn101
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 1
From: West Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by drgman350
what are the pros and cons of each ?
Issue #1. How Green is your new vehicle? BTW, the 400h will ride better and feel more solid. The batteries make the vehicle much heavier and the suspension is modified as a result (but it still gets 30% better mileage) on average.

Two relatives recently bought Camry's and one was a '09 Hybrid. The 4 cylinder Hybrid rode much better than the base '08 with a 4 cylinder. I was amazed that the Hybrid seemed to ride like I was driving a car costing 10K more.

Don't forget that Diesel engines emit cancer causing carcinogens. Considerably more than gasoline engines. "Clean Diesel" means the "particulates" they emit are lessened. The really serious stuff, like cancer causing carcinogens are 10 fold worse with a diesel. This is why Toyota/Lexus doesn't do the Diesel thing.

Last edited by mgtn101; 04-07-08 at 12:09 PM.
Old 04-07-08 | 12:02 PM
  #20  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,698
Likes: 68
From: MA
Default

I dont think anyone here is saying Diesel is green, in fact, its the opposite.
Old 04-07-08 | 12:06 PM
  #21  
mgtn101's Avatar
mgtn101
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 1
From: West Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
I dont think anyone here is saying Diesel is green, in fact, its the opposite.
Cool I was just replying to a comment made earlier by a member saying a diesel had a better sound under-hood than a Hybrid.

Last edited by mgtn101; 04-07-08 at 12:14 PM.
Old 04-07-08 | 12:12 PM
  #22  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,698
Likes: 68
From: MA
Default

yeah, diesel has a better sound if you are into Mack trucks
Old 04-07-08 | 12:23 PM
  #23  
Kan-O-Z's Avatar
Kan-O-Z
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

It seems like people on this forum think that weight is a good thing! I think that's a negative against hybrids. I think the way it rides is more of a personal opinion. We have a 350 and feel that it's smoother than the 400h loaner that we had. Perhaps the loaner was more beat up or had more miles but it just didn't feel as buttery smooth as the 350. The CVT felt rough and loud when it revs up.

As far as fuel economy, we pretty much get 25mpg on any extended highway trips. We get about 20mpg in mixed driving. Perhaps the fuel economy on the 350 is not as good as the hybrid but it's surely pretty darn close (assuming you don't do 90% of your driving in city rush hour at 10mph).

Kan-O-Z
Old 04-07-08 | 02:21 PM
  #24  
sportsfan8's Avatar
sportsfan8
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Kan-O-Z
It seems like people on this forum think that weight is a good thing! I think that's a negative against hybrids. I think the way it rides is more of a personal opinion. We have a 350 and feel that it's smoother than the 400h loaner that we had. Perhaps the loaner was more beat up or had more miles but it just didn't feel as buttery smooth as the 350. The CVT felt rough and loud when it revs up.

As far as fuel economy, we pretty much get 25mpg on any extended highway trips. We get about 20mpg in mixed driving. Perhaps the fuel economy on the 350 is not as good as the hybrid but it's surely pretty darn close (assuming you don't do 90% of your driving in city rush hour at 10mph).

Kan-O-Z
I agree, I get the same MPG as you do with my RX350.
Old 04-08-08 | 08:27 AM
  #25  
biff44's Avatar
biff44
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 766
Likes: 53
From: ma
Default

I compared the hylander hybrid to the RX350, and even though the Lexus dealer is kind of on the other side of the world but the Toyota dealer is in the next town, I went with the Lexus. The hybrid engines may technically have more torque, but that CVT transmission was really weird to drive with. There were lags and over revs, and all sort of odd things going on. Did not think I would ever get used to it.
Old 04-08-08 | 10:46 AM
  #26  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,698
Likes: 68
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by Kan-O-Z
It seems like people on this forum think that weight is a good thing! I think that's a negative against hybrids.
Kan-O-Z
Weight is definitely a negative thing as far as fuel economy is concerned. Thats why Toyota and every other car manufacturers are developing the Lithium ion battery. Which is suppose to be small, lighter, charge faster and hold a charge longer.
Old 04-08-08 | 11:17 AM
  #27  
Boognish's Avatar
Boognish
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by mgtn101
Cool I was just replying to a comment made earlier by a member saying a diesel had a better sound under-hood than a Hybrid.
My comment wasn't regarding sound, it was regarding fuel economy and drivability. A Lexus should be extremely quiet and smooth. The new diesels will meet Tier 2 Bin 5 emissions levels, which means their particulate matter emission will be almost impossible to detect. There is nothing "green" about driving a SUV, imho.
Old 04-09-08 | 08:50 AM
  #28  
Arbitrage1's Avatar
Arbitrage1
Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: DC
Default

I'm greener than anyone, and when shopping we were dead set on the 400h. The dealer would not budge on the price, and it worked out to be $200+ a month more in the lease payment. We relented and went with the 350 (which I love).

I think I did the math back then and it worked out that it would take 7 years for the hybrid option to pay for itself.

One con I didnt see mentioned, and one that often gets overlooked is that these battries contain a lot of heavy metals. I dont know how good the infrastrucutre to recycle them is right now. Or if theyre recycled at all. My understanding is that theyre recycled to a small degree, but most of the bad stuff ends up in a dump. Thats certainly not green...
Old 04-09-08 | 12:11 PM
  #29  
Orzel's Avatar
Orzel
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 722
Likes: 1
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by Arbitrage1
I'm greener than anyone, and when shopping we were dead set on the 400h. <snip>
One con I didnt see mentioned, and one that often gets overlooked is that these battries contain a lot of heavy metals. I dont know how good the infrastrucutre to recycle them is right now. Or if theyre recycled at all. My understanding is that theyre recycled to a small degree, but most of the bad stuff ends up in a dump. Thats certainly not green...
I work in the Telecom industry (manufacture and sales of powering equipment) and we see a lot of batteries come and go, batteries of all types, including Li now. These are very similar to what you will find in the hybrid systems, and believe me, those batteries get recycled, there is a lot of value in the carcass, and the salvaged metals bring very good money. You'll not find these being thrown in the dump, way to valuable a commodity now.
Old 04-16-08 | 06:56 AM
  #30  
Arbitrage1's Avatar
Arbitrage1
Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: DC
Default

Originally Posted by Orzel
I work in the Telecom industry (manufacture and sales of powering equipment) and we see a lot of batteries come and go, batteries of all types, including Li now. These are very similar to what you will find in the hybrid systems, and believe me, those batteries get recycled, there is a lot of value in the carcass, and the salvaged metals bring very good money. You'll not find these being thrown in the dump, way to valuable a commodity now.
What happens to the acids inside? (Im curious)


Quick Reply: rx 350 vs rx 400h



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:37 PM.