RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015) Discussion topics related to the 2010 - 2015 RX350 and RX450H models

Lexus unveils 2010 RX350 & 450h (Pics pg. 18)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-09 | 08:37 PM
  #541  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,498
Likes: 2,559
From: Present
Default

anyone know what this rx450h will cost?
with gas at under $2/gall. u may need to drive a LOT to make back the extra $$$$$$$$$$.
Old 01-05-09 | 08:45 PM
  #542  
CDNROCKIES's Avatar
CDNROCKIES
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 1
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
anyone know what this rx450h will cost?
with gas at under $2/gall. u may need to drive a LOT to make back the extra $$$$$$$$$$.
Haven't seen the official price yet, but the price isn't necessarily relevant to the cost of gas savings. There are people, us included, that are interested in hybrid technology for the environmental benefits. Paying a little bit more to help reduce carbon emissions is justifiable to some. This is also why we are looking at the ML or GLK Bluetec's as that diesel technology also is supposed to dramatically reduce emissions (although we are still researching the benefits of both technologies.)

We live in one of the most beautiful places in the world and would like to try to do our small part to keep it that way.
Old 01-05-09 | 08:55 PM
  #543  
dunnojack's Avatar
dunnojack
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,806
Likes: 6
From: californication
Default

looks decent in silver.

pretty good in red too.

dark colors make it look like it has a huge overbite, or no chin. Made worse by not having a distinct front bumper like the current gen rx.
Old 01-05-09 | 09:12 PM
  #544  
GFerg's Avatar
GFerg
Thread Starter
Speaks French in Russian
CL Folding 25,000
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,303
Likes: 65
From: What is G?
Default

Originally Posted by CDNROCKIES
This is also why we are looking at the ML or GLK Bluetec's as that diesel technology also is supposed to dramatically reduce emissions (although we are still researching the benefits of both technologies.)

We live in one of the most beautiful places in the world and would like to try to do our small part to keep it that way.
Which is the reason why you have an IS-F in your signature?! j/k
Old 01-05-09 | 09:14 PM
  #545  
CDNROCKIES's Avatar
CDNROCKIES
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 1
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by GFerg
Which is the reason why you have an IS-F in your signature?! j/k
LMFAO!

Ok, busted....maybe I should have said "because I feel guilty about owning a 416 hp, 5.0 liter V8 beast, we are considering a hybrid or Bluetec diesel to help the environment."
Old 01-05-09 | 10:00 PM
  #546  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by encore888
http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog...html?nav=RSS20

Driving impressions, experience...very positive

RX 350 18/23 mpg; 275 hp
RX 450h 29/28 mpg; 295 hp

3 audio system choices...
RX 450h extended EV mode for electric-only operation at low speeds

Pricing info still not available...
The hybrid is really impressive. The RX 350 petrol only leaves me cold. No improvement in MPG or HP.
Old 01-06-09 | 04:57 AM
  #547  
lex's Avatar
lex
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 916
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Default

I found these pics on some website:






I gotta say I like it a lot.
Old 01-06-09 | 05:53 AM
  #548  
Vladi's Avatar
Vladi
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 5
From: Florida
Default

If these numbers are true than 450h absolutely kills X5 xDrive35d in fuel efficiency. Let's wait for pricing and some performance tests and see if this thing will make X5 diesel totally obsolete in US market.
Old 01-06-09 | 11:00 AM
  #549  
MR_F1's Avatar
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
hybrid powertrain alone adds 300 pounds. and the 350 as 275, five more horsepower and 6 more torques. lol
The original RX was about 3700lbs if I recall correctly, the RX400h is about 4200lbs. I find this obscene.

5 more hp, whoopteedoo... Where is the 2GR-FSE direct injection engine?
Old 01-06-09 | 11:22 AM
  #550  
LexBob2's Avatar
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,318
Likes: 141
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by MR_F1
The original RX was about 3700lbs if I recall correctly, the RX400h is about 4200lbs. I find this obscene.

5 more hp, whoopteedoo... Where is the 2GR-FSE direct injection engine?
The current RX AWD weighs, 4100 lbs. Which is already pretty heavy IMO.

I wouldn't think the new gen would need to be much heavier. It probably won't have much more safety equipment and ammenities to add weight over the current gen. Not sure what the current h weighs.
Old 01-06-09 | 03:14 PM
  #551  
encore888's Avatar
encore888
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,695
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

The Popular Mechanics article says the weight reduction efforts reduced 66 lbs. off the 350 AWD system, and unspecified amounts off the hybrid system. However, the 3RX adds sound/safety insulation, new rear suspension for improved handling, more speakers, 10 airbags, etc.
Old 01-06-09 | 04:08 PM
  #552  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,951
Likes: 171
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
The current RX AWD weighs, 4100 lbs. Which is already pretty heavy IMO.

I wouldn't think the new gen would need to be much heavier. It probably won't have much more safety equipment and ammenities to add weight over the current gen. Not sure what the current h weighs.
yeah, not sure about the numbers - but in any case, mpg numbers for hybrid are quite nice.

There will be definetly some extra weight no matter what... I wonder how much, as "carry over" RX350 engine with 6AT has 18/23 MPG, which was same number as before... while AWD used to get 17/22... but what version did Popular Mechanics tests? Seems they tested AWD, but we cant be sure...

In any case, 400-500lbs gain, which is 15% extra weight, would have to have some bad influence on mpg numbers... so I am not sure if their info is true, or rather if they are using correct numbers - it could be possible that we are using numbers for base version of old RX350/400h, and they are using numbers for top of the line, or something similar to that... I would expect weight gain of less than 150-200lbs based on mpg...
Old 01-06-09 | 04:33 PM
  #553  
RXSF's Avatar
RXSF
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,059
Likes: 74
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

the article says that tested an AWD RX350
Old 01-06-09 | 05:27 PM
  #554  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,951
Likes: 171
Default

yeah, but are the numbers from AWD? Or did they quote lowest number they got from Lexus?

If they are from AWD, then i dont see how they could have improved city mpg while having 500lbs heavier vehicle, as 6th gear would do nothing for city.

So there is probably difference in counting weight.
Old 01-06-09 | 08:36 PM
  #555  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I remember when Lexus cared about making lightweight vehicles. Back in the 1990s and early 2000s, Lexus vehicles were either the lightest or with BMW among the lightest in each class.

I mean damn can someone really tell the difference between 19 speakers and 12? Not unless you work for the orchestra!


Quick Reply: Lexus unveils 2010 RX350 & 450h (Pics pg. 18)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 PM.